Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 12:35 pm
Good answers Bizzt,
Also
No one is claiming here (so far as I can remember) that mutations are so powerful as to lead to large scale evolution. But one can hardly deny that there are variations in alleles.
The fall may have been the advent of mutations....BUT we would be assuming a lot. And we have to define PERFECT. God perfection in design might not be what we consider PERFECTION. Darwin assumed that God's design was faulty when he observed that trees and animals produce more pollen and sperm than were necessary.
Also
natural selection is simply saying that there are differences in alleles in genes. Most lethal mutations or even harmful mutations would be selected against. Wounldn't this make sense? These would die (be selected against). We need to differentiate between natural differences in alleles and deleterious mutations.bizzt wrote:Quote:
archaeologist wrote:no it doesn't. evolution in any form does not exist. wha you are seeing in some animals would best be described as 'defects' which indicate that something is wrong. we know that when 'the fall' happened, imperfection entered the world; and when we see an animal grow a leg where an antenna used to be, we do not sy--wow evolution!...NO we say--Hold it, something is wrong. and something is wrong, as something corrupted what God had made right.
Did God create a Perfect World?
No one is claiming here (so far as I can remember) that mutations are so powerful as to lead to large scale evolution. But one can hardly deny that there are variations in alleles.
The fall may have been the advent of mutations....BUT we would be assuming a lot. And we have to define PERFECT. God perfection in design might not be what we consider PERFECTION. Darwin assumed that God's design was faulty when he observed that trees and animals produce more pollen and sperm than were necessary.