Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:28 pm
by AttentionKMartShoppers
Answer: There is nothing wrong with it. But that is what we commonly call religious theory. A theory cannot be a theory in the scientific community until there is some kind of evidence to back it up.
OK, so we're agreed, evolution is a religious doctrine...(because, remember, Darwin was an agnostic at best, and atheist at worst....so he had to assume a priori that life came about naturalistically...)-august I'm sure has some stuff on this...I e-mailed it to him....and then I deleted it...
How can one make a prediction based upon the "theory" of intelligent design?
Well, one that comes to mind...junk DNA is not in fact junk.

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:39 pm
by Cougar
What is your point? I don't follow.

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:03 pm
by AttentionKMartShoppers
Obtuse are we? I'm saying that by your definition, evolution is a religious theory. I then said a testable prediction for ID...