Kurieuo wrote:BavarianWheels wrote:Hand out death, then, to all that murder as Christ enhanced and/or made more clear the commandment of murder.
Well, I do think capital punishment is an equal penalty for someone who takes another's life, so I have no qualms with this. My main concern would be whether or not the legal system can prosecute murderers without wrongly prosecuting innocents.
Yet, the difference between the penalty for the Sabbath and murder, is that the Sabbath was "first" instituted as a legal requirement with the Mosaic law.
Not so. The Sabbath was instituted at creation. One need only read the commandment of the Sabbath to see this. The day was made holy at creation. There was no Jew at creation.
Kurieuo wrote:Therefore, it seems inconsistent to say with one breath that the Sabbath law always existed in the form it did as given to Israel, yet in another breath to discrimate against the penalty which was given along side of it. What reason is there to assume the Sabbath should be divorced of its penalty, that is, what reason is there to assume the penalty associated with the Sabbath isn't also apart of the Law to be kept? I can provide a reason why the penalty for murdering someone can differ, as Cain murdered his brother and God did not kill him. Therefore the punishment of murder is not actually apart of God's law for all.
It seems inconsistent, but do not all men die? Is not death the sting of sin? Cain was punished...he was banished and he died. No mention of whether he came around to God or not...that would be speculation at best.
Kurieuo wrote:BW wrote:The Sabbath is part of God's law...it is not "Moses' law"...and the ONLY ONE CONTESTED of the 10 commandments. Why?
It is the only one that can't be reconfirmed in any form as apart of the new convenent. Provide me with a verse in the NT affirming the Sabbath after Christ's resurrection, and I will stop contesting it.
Sure. Take a look at what Paul says about this "new" faith...
Romans 3:30-31 NIV wrote:since there is only one God, who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through that same faith. Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law.
Further...what does James tell us?
James 2:26 NIV wrote: As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.
Now lets take a look at how God knew of Abraham's faith.
Genesis 22:12 NIV wrote:"Do not lay a hand on the boy," he said. "Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son."
And further we have this:
14:15 NIV wrote:If you love me, you will obey what I command.
Christ's words. Does not Christ claim he is the I AM? Unless Christ lies, then he is the same One that wrote the 10 with His own finger. Does God give faulty laws? Or is it we that are faulty?
Certainly no one keeps the law perfectly! This is clear. No one can claim self-righteousness. But as new creatures, as new creations, who now live according to the spirit and not according to the sinful nature...we yearn for what the pirit yearns for. We live according to the spirit.
Paul says:
Romans 7:14-25 NIV wrote:We know that the law is spiritual; but I am unspiritual, sold as a slave to sin. I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do--this I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.
So I find this law at work: When I want to do good, evil is right there with me. For in my inner being I delight in God's law; but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members. What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God--through Jesus Christ our Lord!
So then, I myself in my mind am a slave to God's law, but in the sinful nature a slave to the law of sin.
We see that Paul makes a clear distinction between the law of God and the law of sin. The law of God, he's a slave to. He delights on God's law. But it is the law of sin...(what the law says to a sinner) that is what we are under in the sinful nature. Christ came and redeemed us from the curse of the law (Galatians 3:13) and not
from the law itself. The law is holy, righteous, and good. (Romans 7:12) The law is not to blame for sin, it points sin out. The written law did not exist in Eden (at least we're not told it did) and yet Adam sinned. How so? If sin is transgression of the law...and the law points to sin...what dd Adam and Eve do wrong? More so again, what did Cain do wrong that deserved banishment?
It is what the law says to or about the sinner that is against us. It is not the law itself that is against us. The law, if anyone could be righteous apart from Christ, would be life to that being...as the law would testify of his/her righteousness. In that case the law would be good...better, in both cases the law is holy righeous and good.
If the law was nailed to the cross...then every single person from Adam to the last is saved as the law cannot condemn anyone being "abolished".
One must take these "theologies" to their logical conclusion. God is logical, and not arbitrary.
Kurieuo wrote:Now what I see as still important to this commandment given to Israel,
It was not given to Israel, but to man. Christ attests to this.
Mark 2:27 NIV wrote:Then he said to them, "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.
I don't read J-E-W anywhere there. Is Christ mistaken?
Kurieuo wrote:is the message behind the institution of the Sabbath, which is to honour God above all creation, and respect all He has created and blessed. The Sabbath is a symbol of God's completion of creation, and that everything comes under God, and we should not forget this. However, Israel's literal observance the seventh day, which God blessed as a token of His completed creation, served an important function of distinguishing Israel further from the nations around them, and setting them apart as God's chosen people (as with many other laws given to Israel).
Can it not still serve that purpose? Is not the Sabbath a sign? (Ezekiel 20:12,13)
Does not Christ himself warn the Apostles (and us) that we should pray that our flight would not take place on the Sabbath (Matthew 24:20) about the last days...the days just prior to His return? Why? Did not Christ know the Sabbath was to be "abolished"? Why would it then matter?
Kurieuo wrote:You might protest that these laws were intended for everyone? I think God gives us a clue who these commandments were really intended for in verse 17 which reads, "You shall not covet your neighbor's wife, or his manservant or maidservant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor." (Exodus 20:17) The fact that within the commandments it explicitly mentions not to covet things that appear applicable to Israel and not everyone (e.g., ox and donkey), indicates that the ten commandments were only given to Israel. Yet, many of the reasons and ideas behind to ten commandments are still applicable to all today, and they do capture God's desire for all of us to love Him and each other. For example, the idea of not to covet something that belongs to someone else is applicable to all, because God wants us all to love and have pure motives towards each other.
Are you proposing that only Israelites had possesions like manservants and maidservants, ox and donkey...? Clearly the last few words summarize it for us..."
or anything that belongs to your neighbor."
Is it only Israelites that have neighbors? Is that the next supposition?
Who is our neighbor?
Luke 10:29-37 NIV wrote:But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, "And who is my neighbor?"
In reply Jesus said: "A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, took him to an inn and took care of him. The next day he took out two silver coins and gave them to the innkeeper. `Look after him,' he said, `and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.'
"Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?"
The expert in the law replied, "The one who had mercy on him."
Jesus told him, "Go and do likewise."