Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 6:07 am
The Nazis wouldn't have had to be beaten if the other Europeans, France in particular, hadn't been so vindictive at Versailles.viator wrote:Turgonian, it was stupid unintelligent decisions that allowed German national socialism to regain military power; they were supposed to be disarmed after WW1. The Nazi's wouldn't have had to be beaten if the so-called intelligent leaders in Europe had enforced the rules signed at Versailles.
But you have just said that intelligence cannot objectively be measured. Your verdict that the human species is 'unintelligent' is therefore very subjective. It sounded like that, too.viator wrote:We cannot objectively measure whether we are intelligent because we have no way to make a measurement independent from our influence. How could you measure whether we are intelligent when you state, ..."we know that God made us intelligent ...".
I need only to look at human history to conclude that humans are not an "intelligent species". If human history is not a measure of whether we are an "intelligent species", what is?
It seems you only look at the negative things in history. Yes, there is destructive behaviour, there is war, there is blindness, there is inhumanity (which presupposes that humanity exists, to start with!) -- all because of sin -- but it doesn't end there. There is also a lot of good in the world. Cooperation, including peaceful international cooperation. Friendships. Love. Can you think of, say, Nelson Mandela and then say, 'The human species is unintelligent'? (The human species is not an ominous whole -- it is comprised of individuals, and it is on the individual level that intelligence must be determined.)
Are you unintelligent?
And what is the standard for intelligence?