Re: Darwin and the Holocaust
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:04 am
Thanks Swamper, that was my mistake, the philistines shouldn't be there, I think I added them in simply because I couldn't remember what races my source actually emntioned. I have reread it and it seems that both "Jewish and Arabs are Semitic people." "In 2500BC, the Semites were farming peoples such as the Akkadians,Canaanites and Amorites who lived in wat is now Israel, Jordan and Syria." It also says "The first Hebrews were a Semitic tribe from southern Mesopotamia. Their name meant 'people of the other side' - of the Euphrates River."
When I posted that Kewish peopleare't the only Semites I didn't mean to cause any offence I was simply pointing out what I thought was an interesting fact and I would agree with you that the term has come to exclusively mean Jewish people it just slighly irks mena when people talk abou Anti-Semetic Syrian etc. In the same way it irks me when people say that Ireland was once part of Britian, we were not we were part of the U.K. not Britian, Great Britian is an island. I know people mean no offence and I understand there meaning I just happen to dislike these inaccuracies perhaps I'm just too hypercritival.
Maybe I should join the Pedantic Society.....correction the Society of Pedantics
When I posted that Kewish peopleare't the only Semites I didn't mean to cause any offence I was simply pointing out what I thought was an interesting fact and I would agree with you that the term has come to exclusively mean Jewish people it just slighly irks mena when people talk abou Anti-Semetic Syrian etc. In the same way it irks me when people say that Ireland was once part of Britian, we were not we were part of the U.K. not Britian, Great Britian is an island. I know people mean no offence and I understand there meaning I just happen to dislike these inaccuracies perhaps I'm just too hypercritival.
Maybe I should join the Pedantic Society.....correction the Society of Pedantics