Page 2 of 2

Re: Pi

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:33 pm
by Kristoffer
A record of measure.(that also happens to be Approximate!) The more accurate the record of measure, the better...So a Close approximation is what to look for.

So the answer is kind of Both, It has to be Aprrox. yet it is being used to measure circles, spheres etc.

π (yummy pi)

Re: Pi

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:35 pm
by zoegirl
NO my point is...

Was the intent to BE as close to Pi?

Re: Pi

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:43 pm
by Kristoffer
The intent was the measure things. It just inconveniently needs to be a good approximation to be of any good use or your measurements will be out by a bit(a tinkly little problem)

--actually the margin of error is not too high if you use 3.0 for your approximation, depending upon what actually needs measuring.

Re: Pi

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:10 pm
by zoegirl
Kristoffer wrote:The intent was the measure things. It just inconveniently needs to be a good approximation to be of any good use or your measurements will be out by a bit(a tinkly little problem)

--actually the margin of error is not too high if you use 3.0 for your approximation, depending upon what actually needs measuring.

I can see the criticism of Pi if the order was to make a temple as close to Pi as possible, in which case they didn't do such a grand job.

If, however, the intent was simply to make a circle, then their concern wasn't necessarily to get to Pi as close as possible. All this shows is that it was a pretty good circle.

Re: Pi

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:12 pm
by Kristoffer
A good circle... Well B+ ;) These people shure was above average somewhat! :eugeek:

Re: Pi

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:02 pm
by The Protector
Here is an explanation I found a number of years ago (it is a math website, not a religious one, FYI):

http://www.purplemath.com/modules/bibleval.htm

Re: Pi

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:16 pm
by zoegirl
That's pretty cool, protector! Thanks, and welcome to the board. Hope you stick around and contribute.

Re: Pi

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:10 pm
by Different_Name
The other explanation I had heard was regarding Significant Figures, which says that whenever you do calculations, you round so that you don't have more nonzero digits in the answer than in the original question.
For example, when doing the division of 2.3/5.9, instead of writing the answer as 0.389830508, you're only supposed to put 0.39.
And that was why the calculation of Pi ends up being 3 in the Bible, because the measurements only had 1 significant figure (in 30, the zero does not count for significant figures).

Re: Pi

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:56 pm
by Endwell
See http://creation.com/does-the-bible-say-pi-equals-3. According to the text, the thing was supposed to be shaped like a lily. Every lily I've ever seen was flared at the top. Perhaps the diameter and circumference specifications are both given to indicate the degree of flare.