PaulSacramento wrote:Of course Sam doesn't have as much of a problem with rape, as a naturalist why would he?
It is a perfectly acceptable form of propagation in the natural world.
Debunking Dawkins?
-
- Valued Member
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:22 am
- Christian: No
- Sex: It's Complicated
- Creation Position: I don't believe in creation
Re: Debunking Dawkins?
-
- Board Moderator
- Posts: 9224
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:29 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Debunking Dawkins?
Regardless of how you feel, it is a fact.Beanybag wrote:PaulSacramento wrote:Of course Sam doesn't have as much of a problem with rape, as a naturalist why would he?
It is a perfectly acceptable form of propagation in the natural world.
Sam Harris is not one of my favorite atheist writers ( unlike Hitchens and Dawkins when he sticks to what he knows best like in his book "greatest show on earth") simply because the man is NOT very bright and doesn't seem to grasp the true consequences of what he says.
His ignorance was taken to town by Vox Day in his book and as his "socialist naturalist" leanings are quite evident.