Page 2 of 2
Re: Debunking Dawkins?
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:37 am
by Beanybag
PaulSacramento wrote:Of course Sam doesn't have as much of a problem with rape, as a naturalist why would he?
It is a perfectly acceptable form of propagation in the natural world.
![Doh y#-o](./images/smilies/yahoo/34.gif)
Re: Debunking Dawkins?
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:42 am
by PaulSacramento
Beanybag wrote:PaulSacramento wrote:Of course Sam doesn't have as much of a problem with rape, as a naturalist why would he?
It is a perfectly acceptable form of propagation in the natural world.
![Doh y#-o](./images/smilies/yahoo/34.gif)
Regardless of how you feel, it is a fact.
Sam Harris is not one of my favorite atheist writers ( unlike Hitchens and Dawkins when he sticks to what he knows best like in his book "greatest show on earth") simply because the man is NOT very bright and doesn't seem to grasp the true consequences of what he says.
His ignorance was taken to town by Vox Day in his book and as his "socialist naturalist" leanings are quite evident.