Re: The Christian Walk - a personal testimony
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:48 am
<<deleted>>
"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
I'm saying that I've satopped being so strict with churches who err from all things biblical. If a church was teaching a works-oriented salvation, I would speak. If a church taught that Christ was not God incarnate, I would speak. But my church, and many churches I have attended, do not feel a need to translate tongues. I wholeheatedly disagree. 1 Corinthians 14 gives me very good reason to disagree. But, while I'm uneasy about it, it seems that I've been banging my head against a brick wall in trying to approach the subject with pastors/leaders. So, yes, while they go against Paul's very teaching, I've decided that I will stop speaking out and leave it with God. I'm tired, Rick, of seemingly being the only one who cares about total biblical adherence. And besides, can anyone honestly say they never err from the Word? So while I'm certainly uneasy with it, I've accepted it. I'm happy for you to challenge my acceptance of this, and it would make for good debate.RickD wrote:Without correct doctrine, how do we rightly divide the Bible? Are you saying that now the way to determine if a church is biblical is just if "the spirit" is present? Correct or incorrect doctrine has no bearing?
When I have heard people say they are drunk on the spirit, they have been happy, sometimes filled with laughter, perhaps have their hands raised in the air, and more often that not have their eyes closed. I used to think all of this was a bit weird. But now I see it as a genuine, affectionate relationship with God. I've moved on from my stiff upper lip approach. And here's the thing. Weeks before I went to any revival meeting I was at home, praying a heartfelt prayer to God. Instead of praying quickly before the football came on, I prayed an enjoyable, heartfelt prayer. I felt the Presence hovering above me. I knew the Spirit of God was with me. It felt joyful and pwerful. That's my experience. It's not about experience, but that was mine. And, incidentally, how can one describe an experience without emphasising the experience? Because I descibe an experience does not automatically mean I am placing experience above worship.RickD wrote:I've seen enough Toronto blessings, and holy laughter as well as live attendances in churches where people were "slain in the spirit", to have a very healthy skepticism of anything called "drunk on the Spirit".
These people were "slain in the spirit":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn6FF5nhTSs
Is it really the Holy Spirit?
I will get sceptical on here with you, Rick. But I need to worship God in church free from nagging questions and doubts.RickD wrote:Danny, there have been enough topics here on tongues, that if anything, we should be MORE skeptical about different kinds of "claimed" tongues.
as there is no doubt that I have witnessed wonders at the hands of the Spirit.
I understand your concern with charlatans, Rick, but I can tell you that my church is neither a sideshow or circus.RickD wrote:There is a doubt in my mind and spirit, that what you have witnessed is not the Spirit of God. It may have been the flesh, or at worst, demonic.
We are all the church.
All Christians are the church.RickD wrote:Who is the church? Anyone "slain in the spirit"?
I will keep praying to God, of course, for discernment on this, Rick.RickD wrote:Danny, I don't want to come off sounding like a buzzkill, for lack of a better term, but I just ask you to pray for discernment in this. I know you are searching for more to your life and a better and closer relationship with God. I just don't know if you really have the discernment to know what you're getting yourself into.
I hope this poster gets in on this too. Can't think of who this might be. But I definitely want to be challenged hard on this. So here's hoping.RickD wrote:Frankly, I'm surprised no one else has picked up on any of what I've seen in your posts. There is a prominent poster here that is much more experienced in this stuff than I am. I hope he can chime in on this. Danny, what I'm saying here is out of a sincere concern for you as a Brother in Christ. I've had a very close family member get caught up in a really unhealthy environment that was similar to what you have described. She has been out of the environment for many years now, and still struggles with some of the unbiblical things that went on there.
I certainly believe that I have experienced God. I'm 100 percent positive. Does this mean I'm seeking after experiences above God? No. Does it mean I'm placing experience above what is right? No. I'm simply describing my experience.RickD wrote:Or, I could be completely wrong, and you really could have experienced God. Please don't jump into this with spiritual blinders on your eyes.
gotquestions have a lot to answer for here, Rick. I'd like them to to show me how they distinguish between worshippers having fun & joy etc. and "demented schizophrenic" behaviour. I deal with some schizophrenic behaviour in my line of work, Rick. Let's be sure that gotquestions have their fingers on the pulse here before we believe blithe words from them. I'm conscious that there are some organisations out there charging £15.99 for your salvation. I'm sure you, like me, are sceptical at the goings on within some organisations. I'd like to think that you can trust that I am no sucker, Rick. Thanks for your honesty in challenging me on this. I hope I have put your mind at ease even just a little bit. But if not then I welcome more honesty and robustness from you, brother.RickD wrote:From gotquestions.org:A believer's focus needs to be Jesus Christ, the "author and perfecter of our faith" (Hebrews 12:2), not on oneself, one’s experiences, or even the Holy Spirit. The Toronto Blessing focuses on the last, to the detriment of biblical faith. Believers can have fun, dance, sing, even shout to the Lord. However, when a worship service resembles the dream of a demented schizophrenic and attributed to the work of the Holy Spirit, only one word comes to mind: heresy.
Danny, if you're not sure if the people in the video are "experiencing the Holy Spirit", then I believe you seriously need to pray for discernment. That is all I have to say on this. I pray that God gives you the discernment to deal with this. I'm not going to get into a debate with you about this. That wasn't my intention.With regards to your video, Rick: you tell me! I don't know. I've seen a lot of charlatans in my time. But what about the flock in the presence of the charlatan? You tell me if they are experiencing the Holy Spirit or not. I wouldn't presume to know. I'll stand and identify the charlatan with you if I can. But I won't tell somebody they have not felt the Presence if they say they have. I'm done with that kind of presumptuous naysaying.
I have absolutely no problem with folks raising their hands. My question always will be, "is it this real when the show is off, and you are alone?" I've been to these assemblies, and events, where charasmatic experiences are going on. And I have very little doubt that much is simply self-induced euphoria. I also believe that some of it is genuine. I had a friend healed at the Brownsville revival that went on to give up his career and serve faithfully in the Brazilian mission field. But, also in rare instances I have wondered if some of this was demonic. I once witnessed a man babbling, stammering, and then going into convulsive fits. It would have complied more with how the bible describes demonic possession versus being filled with the Spirit. The problem I see made by Danny and BW is contrasting the 'stiff upper lip' approach to the charasmatic. More on this later.When I have heard people say they are drunk on the spirit, they have been happy, sometimes filled with laughter, perhaps have their hands raised in the air, and more often that not have their eyes closed. I used to think all of this was a bit weird. But now I see it as a genuine, affectionate relationship with God. I've moved on from my stiff upper lip approach.
I would hope that joy would be manifest in serving one another in love. To be honest, I don't put much stock in what happens for one or two hours on Sunday morning, or at a tent meeting, no matter how many days it goes on.What does such joy look like or what would it look like in your life and church?
Sorry BW, but as I mentioned earlier, this comes across as a bit of a false dilema. This implies that basically there are only two options. The, "if you must wisper, wisper a prayer," no emotion Christianity. In contrast to the jitterbug Jesus crowd. This seeks to justify the one, not on its own merits, but because of a polar opposite that may be equally dererving criticism. Personally, I think there are problems with both. Of course the church should not be emotionless. However, that doesn't mean that the church should be ruled by, or led around by emotions. Or, that the right kind of emotion is what we see in the Charasmatic movement today.Bible speaks of having joy - what would it look like? or does God only approve of an emotionless Church without joy?
Act 13:52, "And the disciples were filled with joy and with the Holy Spirit..."
Is righteousness an emotion? Is peace an emotion? Peace can certainly manifest itself emotionally, but we know it is much more than that. As is Christian joy. In fact, the context of this verse has to do with eating and drinking. Not hand waving, or physically expressing any emotion.Rom 14:17, "...for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit."
No question that Paul wants us to be filled with joy and peace in believing. And how is this to manifest itself. Emotional outbursts? Laughing? Babbling? Running the isles? Slain in the spirit? No. the manifestation is that we would abound in hope.Rom 15:13, "Now may the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, that you may abound in hope by the power of the Holy Spirit."
Rick, I was unable to listen to the video. That is why I asked you to lead the way. I will listen and watch it now. But I want to discuss whatever I see. I have an idea of what I am going to see, and while it may make me uncomfortable, I'm not just going to accept words like 'demented' and 'schizophrenic' without sound backing.RickD wrote:Danny, if you're not sure if the people in the video are "experiencing the Holy Spirit", then I believe you seriously need to pray for discernment. That is all I have to say on this. I pray that God gives you the discernment to deal with this. I'm not going to get into a debate with you about this. That wasn't my intention.With regards to your video, Rick: you tell me! I don't know. I've seen a lot of charlatans in my time. But what about the flock in the presence of the charlatan? You tell me if they are experiencing the Holy Spirit or not. I wouldn't presume to know. I'll stand and identify the charlatan with you if I can. But I won't tell somebody they have not felt the Presence if they say they have. I'm done with that kind of presumptuous naysaying.
Yeah, that's the church, Rick. There's a video on the page you linked to and I was at that same venue but it must have been on a different night. I'm having a little difficulty in understanding your problem with these people, Rick. I am not perturbed by them having a 'donations' facility. Without money we would be a very poor church indeed. How do you think this godandscience site was put together? Not with shirt buttons, and not by will alone.RickD wrote:Danny, if this is the website of the church you attended:http://kingdomrevival.org.uk/#/events/4537163632 it walks, talks, and smells like a word-faith/prosperity gospel church. Just by looking at their website on the right side. I looked at "money", and "healing". Their own words show word-faith/prosperity teachings. Danny, please seriously pray about whether God really wants you at this church. If you get caught up in this false gospel, it may do some serious damage to your walk with God. My Mom has been out of a similar church for about 20 years, and she is still recovering from the unbiblical teachings she was into there.
I just watched 2 minutes' worth of the video, Rick. Saw a lot of laughter. Assuming the rest of the video consists of the same, can you describe to me exactly what your issue is here, Rick? And Jlay if he wishes to. I'm looking for specific criticisms, not lazy criticisms of the like shown by gotquestions.RickD wrote:Danny, if you're not sure if the people in the video are "experiencing the Holy Spirit", then I believe you seriously need to pray for discernment. That is all I have to say on this. I pray that God gives you the discernment to deal with this. I'm not going to get into a debate with you about this. That wasn't my intention.With regards to your video, Rick: you tell me! I don't know. I've seen a lot of charlatans in my time. But what about the flock in the presence of the charlatan? You tell me if they are experiencing the Holy Spirit or not. I wouldn't presume to know. I'll stand and identify the charlatan with you if I can. But I won't tell somebody they have not felt the Presence if they say they have. I'm done with that kind of presumptuous naysaying.
No problem Jlay, I was not implying that the church be led by emotions alone. I appreciate your concern and share some of your impute on this matter. In Bible Study Fellowship International, we are finishing up the Study in Isaiah and the last two lessons concerned JOY! To sum up briefly in my own words: This Joy comes from knowing the Lord is there, no matter what may come our way, he has a plan and it includes us, and in the end, He in victorious over all and restores all things back to his divine original intent, perfectly making perfect.jlay wrote:...Sorry BW, but as I mentioned earlier, this comes across as a bit of a false dilemma. This implies that basically there are only two options. The, "if you must whisper, whisper a prayer," no emotion Christianity. In contrast to the jitterbug Jesus crowd. This seeks to justify the one, not on its own merits, but because of a polar opposite that may be equally deserving criticism. Personally, I think there are problems with both. Of course the church should not be emotionless. However, that doesn't mean that the church should be ruled by, or led around by emotions. Or, that the right kind of emotion is what we see in the Charismatic movement today...
I understand this BW. In fact I was reluctant to comment at all for this reason. However, I think there is enough here to warrant concern. The last thing I want to do is stand in the way of a genuine move of God. That is reprehensible. In fact, often I think people reserve airing their concern for fear of this perception. A double edged sword.I was rejoicing with DannyM over his experience as the bible shares to us to do. I had no idea that He would stir up a plethora of old mother hens and father roasters and prophets of warning. These are all well intentioned but let’s be careful of not being found guilty of robbing one of his or her joy in the Lord they encounter.