Page 2 of 2
Re: Climate Science
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:08 pm
by sandy_mcd
Danieltwotwenty wrote:every day I read in the news that their predictions were wrong and they have to change their model to suit new information. ...
The scientists are still arguing about predictions etc...
Are they arguing about the existence of anthropogenic climate change or merely the details?
Re: Climate Science
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:10 am
by Danieltwotwenty
sandy_mcd wrote:Danieltwotwenty wrote:every day I read in the news that their predictions were wrong and they have to change their model to suit new information. ...
The scientists are still arguing about predictions etc...
Are they arguing about the existence of anthropogenic climate change or merely the details?
No idea havent read anything in awhile but I would say from memory the details and not the actual human impact, no doubt we are having an impact but how much is the issue and what are the changes that are taking place, also global weather predictions always seem to be a point of contention.
On this same subject isn't Methane a worse greenhouse gas than CO2, cutting CO2 emissions will have an effect but exploding human populations produce tons of Methane which is going into the atmosphere.
As long as world populations continue to soar we will never be sustainable and will eventually succumb to the greenhouse effect, so relax and chill.