Evidence for God from Science

Neha wrote:

Byblos wrote:

Neha wrote:I am sure you have heard it plenty of times before.

I have, and every time I hear it it makes less and less sense.

I understand.... And disagree.

Ordinarily we disagree on matters of opinion. This is not one of them, it's a matter of fact (you know, the kind that can be proven? ).

Byblos wrote:

Neha wrote:

Byblos wrote:

Neha wrote:I am sure you have heard it plenty of times before.

I have, and every time I hear it it makes less and less sense.

I understand.... And disagree.

Ordinarily we disagree on matters of opinion. This is not one of them, it's a matter of fact (you know, the kind that can be proven? ).

It is infact, because many people even in your faith have no problems with evolution. You do have problems with abiogenesis perhaps?

Neha wrote:

Byblos wrote:

Neha wrote:

Byblos wrote:

Neha wrote:I am sure you have heard it plenty of times before.

I have, and every time I hear it it makes less and less sense.

I understand.... And disagree.

Ordinarily we disagree on matters of opinion. This is not one of them, it's a matter of fact (you know, the kind that can be proven? ).

It is infact, because many people even in your faith have no problems with evolution. You do have problems with abiogenesis perhaps?

Neha, how is 'evolution' a creation stance? That's the question. 'Theistic Evolution' is a creation stance, because of the 'theistic' part. You need to explain how evolution by itself, is your creation stance. If you don't believe in God, you can't believe in anything except naturalism.

RickD wrote:\Neha, how is 'evolution' a creation stance? That's the question. 'Theistic Evolution' is a creation stance, because of the 'theistic' part. You need to explain how evolution by itself, is your creation stance. If you don't believe in God, you can't believe in anything except naturalism.

Exactly. For the most part I have no problem with evolution. But it most certainly does NOT qualify as a creation stance.

Byblos wrote:

RickD wrote:\Neha, how is 'evolution' a creation stance? That's the question. 'Theistic Evolution' is a creation stance, because of the 'theistic' part. You need to explain how evolution by itself, is your creation stance. If you don't believe in God, you can't believe in anything except naturalism.

Exactly. For the most part I have no problem with evolution. But it most certainly does NOT qualify as a creation stance.

You are right, its not a creation stance. Just me sharing my view I guess.

Neha wrote:EVolution.

Fixed it, Dan.

Haha thought it was something new I hadn't heard of.

I like evolution, there is much beauty in the simplicity of it.