Much of your lingo is simply Rastafari speaking from a Rastas in you.
Are you just maybe a mix of Rastafari and christadelphian because both make much ado about God the Father being simply - eternal mind - and as such had his Word (Jesus) within Himself from the beginning... basically all you written here suggest that is your view.
You make much about truth but do you live - actually live by truth and capable of answering truthfully the questions I posed in last frame?
If not, then you do not hold, nor have the truth you claim to have, not the love of the truth because you can't tell the truth. All is simply Rastafari mumbo jumbo about love, truth, and the spirit (rasta) of truth, but you cannot tell the truth about yourself, nor answer truthfully actual questions truthfully. Odd for someoneto do who claims they live by truth and love? So far, the truth you have is simple deception. How do I know, you cannot answer truthfully the questions I ask you, one at a time, and in order. You revert instead to Rastafari logic.
Next, Rastafari'ans as well as yourself both make much noise about the rasta of truth and love and declare it is the sacred duty to enlighten all with love and truth of Rasta etc and etc... in fact much of what you write mirrors Rastafarianism with a touch of christadelphianism in it too.
There is no truth in these because they cannot answer truth with actual truth, Instead they blame the hearers for not understanding. This is not truth because it denies the truth concerning blaming others and thus their love is not the love they proclaim to have with rasta... Why - they and you falsely accuse and judge others harshly, which is not consistent with the love or truth claims they and you present. In this manner, they and you close their minds to actual truth.
Here is the evidence and case in point from your own words:
Do you even know the accusatory tone you are using here that makes your statement in complete contradiction with the truth and love claims you made and claim to live by the same perfect caring, sharing of God's spirit.oldman wrote:have told you what see, I cannot make it any clearer to you for the simple reason you cannot acknowledge this...
“The highest form of love is never self-centered but is a love that gives and sacrifices for the sake of others and remains faithful to love unto death. Only this love can be trusted to speak the truth, for only this love will have no reason to deceive and offend any of us. Such is the essence and character of the Holy Spirit, revealed to us in full through the finished work of the Father's Son.
Through the Father and His Son comes their endless joy in their pure and perfect caring, sharing and giving to each other all that they are and all that they care to create. This Spirit of free and pure eternal love naturally embraces all knowledge and wisdom and would mean nothing without being the heart or the innermost ruling character of a person. This Spirit, this God, will live and rule only in those of us who will value Him above all others.”
...can you?
You are not willing at all to self sacrifice and stoop so low as to answer simple questions in either a Yes or No fashion or short answer when someone ask you. How, arrogant is that? What truth is in arrogance? You claim to have and live by the rule that values all others with perfect caring/sharing, yet, you do not value answering people's questions so as to help them understand what you are saying. Instead you mock them as ignorant and unenlightened and basically insult many of the folks trying to have an actual truthful dialog with you. That is not perfect caring, or sharing, is it?
In fact, all you have written declares the truth of your hypocrisy and condescending tone about truth and love, perfect caring,and sharing when the real truth is this, you lack truth. love. caring, sharing - evidenced shown how you have no joy nor kindness in your heart demonstrated by your contemptuous and condescending tone that basically mocks all attempts of folks trying to hold a discussion intelligently. Complete inability to humbly share or care...
Here is a parable: when a you go to another country, you need to know some of the basic home language of that country. If not, folks will not understand you at all. In true humility and love, you will need to learn their lingo in order to communicate effectively. Oldman, no one here understands your language because you do not speak in truth, love, or humility in a manner one can understand. You come across as Rastafarian arrogant and condescending and thus insult people by your complete unwillingness to explain yourself in the common language of normal English speaking folks. Most don't speak Reggie, nor do the majority speak under the influence of cannabis either.
If you really have truth and love, you would learn our lingo and stop being so condescending...and answer the questions I posed for simple clarity so people could understand what you are saying. By not doing so, and answering in a Rasta rambling way, you show utter contempt and thus the love,truth, and perfect caring is well, what - a lie...
Answer the questions in the language the vast majority of people understand for clarity of truth sake...
Can you...?
Questions I asked earlier...
So what I am hearing you say is this: God is a single person who is manifested as Father, and the Father as the Son, and the Father as the Holy Spirit? Yes - No...
The Son’s life began in the mind of the Father - Correct? Yes or No...
So are you saying that the Father represents the deity of Jesus? Yes or No...
And the Holy Spirit represents the Father truth and love? Yes or No...
Let me try to understand what you are trying to convey here. Are you asserting that before time there was only Jesus as the Father mode, or was there just the Father?
Are you stating that the Son was only in the Father’s mind and as such is the Father - a divine thought?
Are you stating that the Holy Spirit is the Father's divine nature and thought that holds his mind together in unity, and, Therefore the Father, is also but one of three modes that come from His same mind?
