Page 2 of 20
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:34 pm
by Audie
RickD wrote:Audie wrote:RickD wrote:Audie and ACB picking up right where they left off!!!
Some things never change.
How wrong you are. Im just twitting him for being so silly.
Flood =dust is kinda funny, dont you think?
Oh, so when you've been gone, you got your law degree,
and picked up a sense of humor along the way?
See...miracles do happen!!!
When will you learn to tell a joke? That one about the tiny canadian was racist.
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:40 pm
by RickD
Audie wrote:RickD wrote:Audie wrote:RickD wrote:Audie and ACB picking up right where they left off!!!
Some things never change.
How wrong you are. Im just twitting him for being so silly.
Flood =dust is kinda funny, dont you think?
Oh, so when you've been gone, you got your law degree,
and picked up a sense of humor along the way?
See...miracles do happen!!!
When will you learn to tell a joke? That one about the tiny canadian was racist.
Racist? You do know that Canadian is not a race, don't you?
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:55 pm
by Philip
You do know that Canadian is not a race, don't you?
Um, millions of tan-challenged hockey fans who think summer isn't supposed to last more than five days would likely disagree, eh?
(So says the Scotts-Irish boy who gets burned in five minutes in the sun
)
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 6:17 pm
by RickD
Philip wrote:You do know that Canadian is not a race, don't you?
Um, millions of tan-challenged hockey fans who think summer isn't supposed to last more than five days would likely disagree, eh?
(So says the Scotts-Irish boy who gets burned in five minutes in the sun
)
You and I are both WASPs, so that automatically makes us racist.
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:50 am
by Philip
Really, I next to never think about my own race, unless someone has a problem with it - which is a VERY different thing from someone having a legitimate problem with something I've done or said. People who have a problem with someone's RACE, actually have a problem with GOD!
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:47 am
by Audie
Philip wrote:Really, I next to never think about my own race, unless someone has a problem with it - which is a VERY different thing from someone having a legitimate problem with something I've done or said. People who have a problem with someone's RACE, actually have a problem with GOD!
What kind of problem with God do people have, when they spread the false word that He committed a vast atrocity with a world wide flood?
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 7:48 am
by B. W.
Audie wrote:Philip wrote:Really, I next to never think about my own race, unless someone has a problem with it - which is a VERY different thing from someone having a legitimate problem with something I've done or said. People who have a problem with someone's RACE, actually have a problem with GOD!
What kind of problem with God do people have, when they spread the false word that He committed a vast atrocity with a world wide flood?
So you have no problem with evil people then and call God a murdered to rid the world of evil way back then and then blaming him for not stopping it today
Wow...
-
-
-
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 8:22 am
by crochet1949
Hi Audie
God did Not commit a vast atrocity with a world-wide flood. When a person reads the Scripture portion that deals with the flood -- God had let the people do their own thing and finally got sick of the brutality, far-reaching sinfulness that the people had gotten into. He warned the people through Noah and his family of the coming consequence of their sinfulness and all the people did was laugh at them. So -- the flood waters came /just as predicted and people died in their sinfulness -- just like the Scriptures warn us -- we are all sinners and the wages of sin is physical death. But the gift of God is salvation being made available / possible by doing what God tells us to do. Their physical 'salvation' was in the ark. IF the people had Listened to God's Word as presented over time, through Noah and his family -- they Could Have been 'saved' along with the others.
The 'world' with people in it got destroyed along with the People in it. As the result Of their Unrepented Sinfulness.
When will you know the results of the Bar Exam you took?
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:32 am
by RickD
Or, mankind had sexual relations with fallen angels, and had children who were half demon.
So God destroyed all the demon spawn.
So say some.
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:49 am
by Audie
B. W. wrote:Audie wrote:Philip wrote:Really, I next to never think about my own race, unless someone has a problem with it - which is a VERY different thing from someone having a legitimate problem with something I've done or said. People who have a problem with someone's RACE, actually have a problem with GOD!
What kind of problem with God do people have, when they spread the false word that He committed a vast atrocity with a world wide flood?
So you have no problem with evil people then and call God a murdered to rid the world of evil way back then and then blaming him for not stopping it today
Wow...
-
-
-
That would be quite the viewpoint. But no, that is a bad guess, its not me.
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:50 am
by Jac3510
RickD wrote:Audie wrote:RickD wrote:Audie wrote:RickD wrote:Audie and ACB picking up right where they left off!!!
Some things never change.
How wrong you are. Im just twitting him for being so silly.
Flood =dust is kinda funny, dont you think?
Oh, so when you've been gone, you got your law degree,
and picked up a sense of humor along the way?
See...miracles do happen!!!
When will you learn to tell a joke? That one about the tiny canadian was racist.
Racist? You do know that Canadian is not a race, don't you?
THAT WAS THE WRONG ANSWER!!! The only right answer is, "
That's okay. Everyone's a ritter bit lacist."
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:52 am
by Jac3510
Philip wrote:Really, I next to never think about my own race, unless someone has a problem with it - which is a VERY different thing from someone having a legitimate problem with something I've done or said. People who have a problem with someone's RACE, actually have a problem with GOD!
That's just your WASP privilege speaking. You racist.
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 11:00 am
by Audie
Jac3510 wrote:RickD wrote:Audie wrote:RickD wrote:Audie wrote:
How wrong you are. Im just twitting him for being so silly.
Flood =dust is kinda funny, dont you think?
Oh, so when you've been gone, you got your law degree,
and picked up a sense of humor along the way?
See...miracles do happen!!!
When will you learn to tell a joke? That one about the tiny canadian was racist.
Racist? You do know that Canadian is not a race, don't you?
THAT WAS THE WRONG ANSWER!!! The only right answer is, "
That's okay. Everyone's a ritter bit lacist."
Not me. I know what's best.
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 11:15 am
by crochet1949
So Audie
What IS best.
You Still apparently feel that God should be blamed for destroying the lives of horribly evil people? Why blame God? Because He created people with the freedom of choice / with Choice comes consequences or rewards For those choices. When people Choose to do the evil and they've been warned about the consequences and Still continue, well, the end result Probably Won't be pretty.
The same thing holds true Today -- we Continually do the same thing They did -- we have Gods' warning about the results Of our sinfulness. Yet, we get mad at God for even suggesting an everlasting time in hell ---- well, we Are the sinners and He Has provided a way to stay out of hell. So why don't we simply accept His way of staying out?
Re: The biblical flood date
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 11:53 am
by Jac3510
Audie wrote:Not me. I know what's best.
Of course.
You're (
) Your answer is always best. It's a gender thing. I can say that, because I'm a happily married man. Were I not happily married, I couldn't say it, because not saying it woulld be the direct cause of me not being happily married. And were I not married I couldn't say it, because unless and until you live with one who always knows what is best, you cannot appreciate the gravity of this truth. But since I am, in fact, happily married, I can say with authority on slightly less than Scripture on the one hand and you on the other, that you certainly know what is best.
That's why I was correcting Rick. Trying to help him out, you see--maybe he will be more happily married now.