Evidence for God from Science

edwardmurphy wrote:I'm hurt, Rick. I always look for facts, truth, and accuracy.

And this is why I didn't engage you or give you anything of substance. Like usual, your 'research' is pathetic. How do I know it is? Because there are other sources you can find and much more information than what you 'looked up'. Again, you didn't look for anything but your confirmation bias. Like your first 'research' looking into wiki and the fantastical conclusions you draw (give me a break..). If you want to educated yourself, Ed, try to prove yourself wrong. Maybe if you'd actually try, you'd accumulate all the evidence to evaluate. And, no. I'm not going to do your work for you for the same reason why I didn't before; it has to do with your heart. It's apparent your agenda isn't about finding Him out, or learning about Him, or about me for that matter. If you can't do the very basic due diligence of getting over yourself to at least gather an opinion reflecting reality, don't bother responding to me.

Rick, if I was hurt the last thing I'd say is "I'm hurt."

Mallz wrote:Like usual, your 'research' is pathetic.

Well, I'm not a professional researcher and I didn't have all day to look. If you have piles of information that I didn't find then go ahead and post it.

edwardmurphy wrote:

Mallz wrote:Like usual, your 'research' is pathetic.

Well, I'm not a professional researcher and I didn't have all day to look. If you have piles of information that I didn't find then go ahead and post it.

Oh, those Progressive Liberal Socialist types admit to intellectual laziness as a great virtue

Here is an amusing off topic read from 2011 concerning fake news before it was known as such


-
-
-

B. W. wrote:Oh, those Progressive Liberal Socialist types admit to intellectual laziness as a great virtue

So if I don't go all out to research the veracity of every dubious "miracle" claim then I'm the one being lazy? I could see how you'd like to think that, given the rate at which you spam [nonsense] "news" articles and your legendary disinclination to support any of your many, many suspect claims, but I think you have it backwards.

edwardmurphy wrote:

Mallz wrote:Like usual, your 'research' is pathetic.

Well, I'm not a professional researcher and I didn't have all day to look. If you have piles of information that I didn't find then go ahead and post it.

I tried to help you throughout this election. I told you believe the opposite of about 90% of what the MSM reports and you'd get it right and know the truth. You've got to know how to watch the MSM,it takes a little practice,but it's not hard. Get your news from alternative news services. They are much,much more accurate and better inform you about what is going on that the MSM ignores,like wikileaks and all of the corruption in the Democrat party. Don't believe CNN when they tell you not to read wikileaks e-mail leaks and that they will tell you what is in them.

We wouldn't ignore them if they had to do with RNC corruption like ya'll did. Ya'll don't want to know about the corruption in our government that needs to be dealt with. You still do not get to choose in the primaries who will represent the Democrats,the DNC and the MSM chooses for ya'll. Your vote does not matter,you don't get to choose. You don't care about it? Your dislike for Trump trumps the corruption in the democratic party?

It was not the Russians that hacked into them to help Trump win. I already told you it was people in our intelligence agencies that are fed up with this corruption and they wanted it exposed and it was.

edwardmurphy wrote:

B. W. wrote:Oh, those Progressive Liberal Socialist types admit to intellectual laziness as a great virtue

So if I don't go all out to research the veracity of every dubious "miracle" claim then I'm the one being lazy? I could see how you'd like to think that, given the rate at which you spam [nonsense] "news" articles and your legendary disinclination to support any of your many, many suspect claims, but I think you have it backwards.

Oh, how those Progressive Liberal Socialist types use ridicule to silence any and all who oppose... you can cite all the evidence and they'll ridicule it and you.

Now Ed, please take a chill pill, get a warm blanket,put on soothing sea side music, wear some fuzzy slippers, have a hot coco in your safe zone...

The article was posted for people to comment on and for that, they have as well, as you.

What you advocate is the silencing the basic human right of coming to one's own personal conclusions...

Thank you for again proving liberal hate, tactics, are indeed true...
-
-
-

B. W. wrote:Oh, how those Progressive Liberal Socialist types use ridicule to silence any and all who oppose... you can cite all the evidence and they'll ridicule it and you.

How would you possibly know that? You never cite any evidence of anything. Based on our previous discussions, I don't think you even read half the stuff that you link or my replies. Ridicule is an appropriate response to a ridiculous person saying ridiculous things in a ridiculous way, and that describes you (singular - don't try to bring all of Christendom into this) to a tee.