Evidence for God from Science

mrtzur2015 wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:01 am

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 9:52 am

mrtzur2915 wrote:
Sunrise to downtown is one day. God does not look at days the way we do

I guess I don't look at days anywhere near the same way God does then.

I've never heard that sunrise to downtown is one day.

Btw, I think in ancient, biblical times, sunset to sunset was a day(the sabbath, for example). Or, a finite, and long period of time, was also a day(as it was in Noah's day).

Really Ricardo?
Genesis 1:3-5 King James Version (KJV)

3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:10 am But what does that have to do with going downtown?

BavarianWheels wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:18 am

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:10 am But what does that have to do with going downtown?

Here is another example of this sarcasm that permeates just about every one of your posts.

Isn't it possible that English isn't this person's first language OR they don't have a complete mastery of the keyboard? Why belittle at EVERY opportunity? Some sarcasm is not bad...but when it is your one bit, it becomes annoying.
.
.

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:23 am

BavarianWheels wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:18 am

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:10 am But what does that have to do with going downtown?

Here is another example of this sarcasm that permeates just about every one of your posts.

Isn't it possible that English isn't this person's first language OR they don't have a complete mastery of the keyboard? Why belittle at EVERY opportunity? Some sarcasm is not bad...but when it is your one bit, it becomes annoying.
.
.

Fyi,
While that was a joke, it's not sarcasm.
I was teasing him with what was most likely an auto correct while trying to type "sundown".

But thanks for the enlightening post Bav!*

*That was sarcasm.

mrtzur2015 wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 9:45 am

DBowling wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 6:29 am

mrtzur2015 wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 6:00 am it couldn’t of been Sunday resurrection as the Bible tells us marry went early before the sunrise

You are misstating what the Scriptural text says...
John 20:1 explicitly says that Mary went to the tomb on the first day of the week (ie Sunday) (just like all three of the other Gospels say).
The text does not say that Mary went to the tomb before sunrise. The text says that it was still dark outside when she went to the tomb which is consistent with "after the Sabbath, as it began to dawn" from Matthew 28:1.
I think we all have experienced that it is still dark outside during early dawn.

So all four of the Gospels establish that Mary (and the other women) went to the tomb on the first first day of the week, after the Sabbath, early in the morning, as it began to dawn.

But yeah y’all can keep believing deception.

I'm afraid that I'm not the one believing deception in this case...
I'm believing what all four of the Gospels explicitly and unambiguously state.

Oh and FYI for Christmas followers it his birth wasn’t on the 25 of December

I actually think you are probably correct with this assertion, but I'm not convinced that your assertion about September is correct.
But I don't have a dogmatic position regarding the precise date of Jesus' birth.

It was early morning while it was still dark therefore before sunrise.

neo-x wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 1:19 pm Anybody care to tell me how many trees were planted by the grave while you're at it?

BavarianWheels wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:33 am

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:23 am

BavarianWheels wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:18 am

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 10:10 am But what does that have to do with going downtown?

Here is another example of this sarcasm that permeates just about every one of your posts.

Isn't it possible that English isn't this person's first language OR they don't have a complete mastery of the keyboard? Why belittle at EVERY opportunity? Some sarcasm is not bad...but when it is your one bit, it becomes annoying.
.
.

Fyi,
While that was a joke, it's not sarcasm.
I was teasing him with what was most likely an auto correct while trying to type "sundown".

But thanks for the enlightening post Bav!*

*That was sarcasm.

It was all Sarcasm: the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.
.
.

Sarcasm often depends upon the voice tone. There are seven types:

Self-Deprecating Sarcasm – This category of sarcasm expresses an overstated sense of inferiority and worthlessness.
Brooding Sarcasm – In this criticism, the speaker utters something polite. However, the tone of his speech has a marked bitterness to it.
Deadpan Sarcasm – It is expressed without emotion or laughter, making it difficult for the listener to judge whether the speaker is joking or mocking.
Polite Sarcasm – A speaker is said to have delivered a polite sarcasm when his listeners only get to realize that his kind remark was a sarcastic one after they had given it some thought.
Obnoxious Sarcasm – This kind of sarcasm makes people feel like punching the speaker in the face. It is not very funny, and it gets under your skin.
Manic Sarcasm – This type of sarcasm is delivered in an unnatural happy mood, which makes the speaker look like he has gone crazy.
Raging Sarcasm – This kind of sarcasm relies mainly on exaggeration and violent threats.

Kurieuo wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 4:51 pm Don't worry too much Bav. I've banned Rick before for his scarcasm, and if he keeps it up he's heading for a second. We mods love to ban so much we sometimes ban each other. (perhaps that's not the best of jokes right now [please don't ban me] )

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 4:09 pm Yes, my sarcasm occasionally mocks.

BavarianWheels wrote: ↑Thu May 10, 2018 6:58 am

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 4:09 pm Yes, my sarcasm occasionally mocks.

...and if you do this on a normative basis, I/we cannot be held accountable to know your mood of the day. Therefore any sarcasm from your hand tends to land on the side of mocking in a more serious discussion...especially when you directly call me a "Judaizer".
.
.

RickD wrote: ↑Thu May 10, 2018 7:03 am

BavarianWheels wrote: ↑Thu May 10, 2018 6:58 am

RickD wrote: ↑Wed May 09, 2018 4:09 pm Yes, my sarcasm occasionally mocks.

...and if you do this on a normative basis, I/we cannot be held accountable to know your mood of the day. Therefore any sarcasm from your hand tends to land on the side of mocking in a more serious discussion...especially when you directly call me a "Judaizer".
.
.

Calling you a judaizer was not sarcasm. It was a completely serious post. I understand that you don't like it. None of us like to be called out on false doctrines that we hold on to.

Kurieuo wrote: ↑Thu May 10, 2018 7:10 am How isn't SDA theology not stuck in Mosaic law? In that respect, judaizer seems adequate to me also. But, I'm open to you Bav explaining otherwise how it's not.