Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 6:02 am
I'm glad I have some good reaction to my post.Kurieuo wrote:That's a massive claim to make, and so I'm assuming you're quite an authority on this issue. Tell me, what are your qualifications and experiences with researching and investigating such things?Alien wrote:There are no scientific evidences for UFO existence.
Kurieuo.
It's not a massive claim. Opposite, it would be a massive claim to state that UFO do exist.
I don't need to be an authority (I don't like very much this word, I confess) to say that I have never read in any scientific publication an evidence about UFO existence.
Unless we are giving different meanings to the acronym "UFO". Strictly speaking, there might be many flying objects that are unidentified. For example, if I throw a stone in the air, and you do not clearly see that it is a stone before it falls into the water, then for you this was an "unidentified flying object".
But, just to avoid stupid cases, with the term UFO I intend what normal people intend, ie an alien flying vehicle.
Please tell me whether you intend something different, otherwise we start a useless discussion.
I agree: strictly speaking, the Earth is the only place that Scientists have found that supports life, but this does not mean that Earth is the only place in the universe with these environmental conditions.bizzt wrote:Where's the Stat's On that... Really Earth is the only place that Scientists have found that is possible of a life-supporting EnvironmentAlien wrote:Statistically, in some parts of the universe there might be several places with a life-supporting environment.
In addition, in some places in the Solar System there might some environments which, even if not similar to those on Earth, might support "a" life, even if not similar to ourselves.