Page 2 of 2
homosexual marriage
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:46 pm
by ray
The feeling that homosexuals being allowed to marry would lead to polygomy does not stem from homosexuality but from the redifining of the legal term marriage. If it can be redefined from a man and a woman (which it was ) to become something different, why could it not be changed again in two or three years. The precedent is now set, the legal definition of marriage can be changed. Looking down the road, who can say another group will not come along and try to change the definition again. They would probably have a good chance of success as our (I'm Canadian) government has now affirmed the fact that marriage is a redefinable term.
Ray
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 7:03 pm
by Mystical
One of the main reasons fro the fall of Rome was a breakdown in moral sturcture. Makes me wonder what will become of the U.S., Canada, etc.
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:23 pm
by AttentionKMartShoppers
There are 400+ reasons as to why Rome might have fallen.
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:51 pm
by Mystical
Umm, I said "one of the main reasons."
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 11:43 am
by numeral2_5
Mystical wrote:One of the main reasons fro the fall of Rome was a breakdown in moral sturcture. Makes me wonder what will become of the U.S., Canada, etc.
Give me a break, it's not like we are killing people for sport.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:27 pm
by Mystical
numeral2_5:
...it's not like we're killing people for sport.
Hmmm...and murder (for sport) is the only kind of moral breakdown that you know of? I've heard of so many more.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 6:39 pm
by Jbuza
Give me a break, it's not like we are killing people for sport.
Modern society has aborted more babies than died in all the gladiator battles.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:10 pm
by Mystical
Good point.