"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
Hello faded. Would you like to discuss something? We don't ban people here for simply disagreeing. You should take a look at the board purpose and discussion guidelines (within the News and Announcements forum). Thanks.faded wrote:Banning people with whom you disagree?
How very 'christian' of you.
;_; That's too bad.faded wrote:Oh, right, it's a closed shop, then. No dissenting voices allowed here. Non-christians welcome as long as they don't mention stuff we don't like. Okay, I think I get that.
No, thanks, cslewislover, I don't want to discuss anything with you nutters. Bye-bye.
For the record, many Christians get booted off this forum as well.. In fact, I would say that the number is practically equal. Second, we have many evolutionists and atheists that make up this panel as well. Why haven't we banned them? Well for starters they remain civil in their discussions, they do not throw ad hominem attacks and are professional in their stance. Munster was released for his ad hominem's and also his illogical reasonings. He refuted to answer our questions and disengaged in the discussion. Debating is one thing, elephant hurling and ad hominems are another. Also for the record, Christians get banned from atheist's web sites too. I happen to be one of those as well.faded wrote:Oh, right, it's a closed shop, then. No dissenting voices allowed here. Non-christians welcome as long as they don't mention stuff we don't like. Okay, I think I get that.
No, thanks, cslewislover, I don't want to discuss anything with you nutters. Bye-bye.
Ad hominem...? Thanks for your professionalism.faded wrote:No, thanks, cslewislover, I don't want to discuss anything with you nutters. Bye-bye.
Perfect example of the reasoning behind the current discussion guidelines which entirely changed the nature of the board some years ago now.Gman wrote:Ad hominem...? Thanks for your professionalism.faded wrote:No, thanks, cslewislover, I don't want to discuss anything with you nutters. Bye-bye.
I still miss JimmyHiggins...Kurieuo wrote:Perfect example of the reasoning behind the current discussion guidelines which entirely changed the nature of the board some years ago now.Gman wrote:Ad hominem...? Thanks for your professionalism.faded wrote:No, thanks, cslewislover, I don't want to discuss anything with you nutters. Bye-bye.