Re: sabbath keeping
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:25 am
jlay wrote:Rom. 7:7 "What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "Do not covet."First If, as you claim, that God/Jesus' Holy Laws were done away with then why do you use them to convict others of sin?
Rom. 3:20 "Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin."
Rom. 3:19 "Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God."
The Law condemns. It exposes the sinfulness of the soul. That is what Jesus did with the rich young ruler. The Law can only lead us to the cross. It can not save us. It shows us how lawless we really are.
Why want you get off trying to claim that I have said that we are to strive to keep God/Jesus' Holy Laws so as to be saved when I have not done so at no time? Striving to keep God/Jesus' Holy laws does not and can not save us as we are saved by grace not of works, but striving to keep God/Jesus' Holy Laws is our works. Please show me how anyone can do good works without striving to keep God/ Jesus Holy Laws? Yes God/Jesus' Holy Laws, when we break them, does convict us of sin as any law does even the laws of man so would you say that because the laws of man convicts us of sin/wrongdoing that they should be done away with? Yes God/Jesus' Holy Laws causes us to look to God/Jesus for forgiveness which is a good thing not an evil thing. As we are sinners and as sinner we arre unable to save ourselves so we have to made to know that we are and that our only hope is what Jesus did for us on the cross. So I ask you how is this contrary to us? If there was no law then there can be no sin and where there is no sin there is no need for forgiveness. Now the law makes us aware that we are sinners and that we need to be saved and yes it points us to Jesus and what He did for us, but His death did not and does not make null and void the law.
We are to strive to keep God/Jesus' Holy Commandments does for salvation, but because we Love Him and desire to obey Him in all things.
John 14:21, 21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
John 5:9-10, 9 As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love.
10 If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.
John 3:22-24, 22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.
23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.
24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.
I can post many more scripture that makes this very clear. We are not to strive to keep God/Jesus' Holy Laws in the hopes of gain for ourselves but because we love Him. Now if you are not willing to obey Him in all things how can you claim to Love Him? Why do you and all other christians keep trying to claim that I am saying that you have to keep God/Jesus' Holy Commandments so as to be saved? Can you please post any post of mine where I have done so? Why are you unwilling to accept the fact that we are commanded to keep His Holy Laws simple because we Love Him? Why do you refuse to do so and then still claim that you do Love Him? If your children steadfastly refused to obey you would you truly believe that they loved you? We strive to keep God/Jesus' Holy Laws so that the world can see that we Love Him and that we desire to obey Him. If you strive to keep His Holy Commandments in the hopes of gain then you gain nothing. You feel that since you gain nothing then you have no need to keep His Holy Laws.
Jesus fulfilled the penality of the Law. Which was and is death. Now in what other way did Jesus fulfill the laws so that they could be removed? I ask you, If I standup in a court room and I tell the court that I am willing to serve the penality of man's laws for the person who is on trial for breaking it and I do serve that penality have I made null and void the law or just fulfilled the penality of it? If it were possible for me to I could serve all the penalities of all men who have broken the laws of men but that would not do away with the laws of men would it? Then why do you and all christians claim that when Jesus suffered the penality of our having broken God/Jesus' Holy Laws He did away with those laws? He did not. He simple suffered the penality of the law for us.Since, as you say, Jesus suffered and died on the cross so as to remove His Holy Laws, that you claim, were contrary to us then why do you make null and void what He did by using them to convict others of sin?
I would say that Jesus (in his own words) FULFILLED the law and the prophets. And as Paul said, "God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God" (2 cor 5:21)
The Bible makes it clear that Christ was, "the Lamb that was slain from the creation of the world." (Rev. 13:8) And, "so that by the grace of God He might taste death for everyone" (Heb. 2:9) And that Jesus was, " who gave Himself as a ransom for all, the testimony given at the proper time. " (1 Tim. 2:6)If, as you claim, that His Holy Laws were done away with by being nailed to His cross then does it not stand to reason that all men since that time are without sin as the Apostle says?
And, "He Himself is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for those of the whole world." (1 John 2:2)
Does this mean that all will inherit eternal life? No.
How does any of this answer my question? Now if there is no law then it is impossible to convict of sin. Would you feel it was right if you where arrested and convicted of a crime for which there was no law? Let's say you were arrested and convicted for washing your hands for which there is no law that says you cannot does so would you feel that this was just and fair? Now please do not tell me how stupid this is as I know, but that is pretty much what you are claiming. You are saying that even though there are no laws, as they have been done away with, that all will be convicted of having broken laws that no longer exist and you are claiming that that is just and fair. Now to be just and fair God would have to grant all who has lived after Jesus' death and ressurection eternal life as He has no laws to convict anyone of sin. Is not God a just and righteous God?
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes should not perish but have everlasting life."
The sin problem has been dealt with. Even thought sin till exist. No question about that. It is not a matter of whether sin exists, but has it been dealt with. The unbeliever's sin has been dealt with. But if they do not 'trust' in the work of Christ, then they will be condemned. The Law helps to enlighten the sinner as to what to beleive. That Jesus is the Christ, the lamb of God, who paid your sin debt.
I can't say this any more simply than this. Anyone who preaches that salvation is obtained by one's own efforts and striving to keep the OT, is preaching a false gospel.
What law helps sinners? According to you and all christians there is no law. Why want you answer my question? WHAT LAW? Is this question to hard to answer? I can not make it any more simple.
Please here again you are accusing me falsely by trying to say that I have said something I have not. Why do you continue to do so? Is it because you are afraid that if you do not then what you claim to be true will be seen that it is not true?
Quoting random verses and trying to apply them to Sabbath keeping is reckless and lacks any evidence of rightly dividing the word of truth.
Further, the Sabbath is not established by the Roman calendar. Saturday is derived from Saturn's day. A pagan diety. Many people today consider Sunday as the last day of the week, not the first. You couldn't even reconcile the Jewish calendar to the modern calendar if you wanted to.I say to you that you are not keeping the sabbath if you do not acknowlege that God's Holy Sabbath is the seventhday and not the firstday.
You are wrong. Do you truly believe that God would be so unjust as to command us to do something knowing that we would not have the ways and means to do so? You do believe in an unjust god don't you.
Look at the history of the all calendars and you will find something very important. Something that only God could do. Yes men has changed the number of months in a year. Yes he has changed the number of days in a month. Yes men have given the days names of pagan gods. Man has done many things to alter and to change the calendar, but God is wiser than man and greater than man and He made sure that we can know what day is His Holy Sabbath, because even though man has made all these changes to the calendar the one thing God/Jesus has never allowed man to alter are to change in any way is the number of days in a week. He made them seven and number them and they remain seven. He even set the timing of each day, from sunset to sunset. So it is a simple matter of looking at your calendar and counting from left to right, sunday=day 1, monday=day 2, tuesday=day 3, wed.=day 4, thur.=day 5, friday=day 6, saturday=day 7. Now since God's days begin at sundown, or sunset, then His Holy Sabbath begins at sundown/sunset friday and last until sunset/sundown saturday.
Ask any Jew what day is God's Holy Sabbath they will tell you.
Romans 14:5-6 "One man considers one day more sacred than another; another man considers every day alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind. He who regards one day as special, does so to the Lord."
What does this have to do with the question concerning the matter of if the law is still to be obeyed or not? If I consider one day above another has nothing to do with the question as to if the law is to be kept or not. It simple shows that if a man so wishes to keep all days as he was keeping God's Holy Sabbath then we have no right to judge him for it or if a man chooses to just keep the Sabbathday Holy we are not to judge him for it as they both are obeying God in the keeping of His Holy Sabbath.
If you want to take one day and honor the lord, then you are welcome. But when you try to force your view on others, you become a legalist, and burden yourself with the whole law as a means to righteousness.
Romans 14:13 "Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in your brother's way."
Jesus gave several commandments in the NT. Most notable, 'love one another.' " If we take the encounter with the rich young ruler as a literal command. Then I would hope that you have sold all his possessions and given the proceeds to the poor. I can say with relative certainty that you have not.
I say to you that you have no idea what I have done or have not done, but I tell you if God/Jesus was to command me to sale all that I have and give it unto the poor I would do so without and problem, because I know my Father and my Lord and master Jesus, because just as He commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son Issac and Abraham was willing to do so and because he was willing to do so God gave unto him another to sacrifice instead. Now please do not try to tell me that when Jesus made this statement to the rich man He was also commanding me to do the same thing, because He was not. He was speaking to only the rich man He was not giving a commandment.
There is certainly something to be said for Sabbath keeping and the nation of Israel. Jews are saved the same way anyone is saved, by faith. However, God called the Jews to manifest His Kingdom on earth, through the OT laws, and through their Nation.It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever:
So then you do not believe scripture where you are told that you are the adopted child of Abraham, Issac and Jacob? Nor do you seem to understand that the Jews are of the House of Judea and are not all of the children of Israel because you still have those of the House of Israel. You do not know nor do you understand that the nation of Israel split into two nations. One became known as the House of Judea and the other became known as the House of Israel. Nor do you know or understand the history of both so therefore you make th same mistake of all christians assuming that you are not of the seed of Abraham, but no matter even if you are not of the seed of Abraham if you are a child of God through Jesus then you are an adopted child of Abraham and therefore must obey all things as such, because would not require one to obey His laws while allowing the other to not do so. The is ample proof that God's laws were in affect long before He brought the children of Israel to be. There is even proof that God's Holy Sabbath was being kept before there were any children of Israel. Look at the story of the manna in the OT and take note that God told them this before He had given them His Holy Commandments on stone tablets.
Now that I have made it abundantly clear that I have never told anyone that they must strive to keep God/Jesus' Holy Commandments will you answer my question correctly without trying to imply that I have?
Yes I do believe that all who do not desire and who do not strive to keep God's Holy Commandments will not be saved.I have never stated at anytime that we are to strive to keep God/Jesus' Holy Laws so as to be saved and please do not try to make out that I have.
Canuckster1127 wrote:Fitzlight,
You appear to be equating Jesus' commandments with the legal systems of the OT. Do you sincerely not see any difference? Jesus himself was accused by the Scribes and Pharisees of breaking "commandments" related to the Sabbath, washing before meals and then association with unclean people.
You seriously believe salvation comes from "striving to keep the commands?"
How sad.
bart