Re: The Law
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 9:22 pm
Yes.. In fact I just sent you a pm.KBCid wrote:
G, do you get the same feeling when you read my posts as I do when I read yours?
"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
Yes.. In fact I just sent you a pm.KBCid wrote:
G, do you get the same feeling when you read my posts as I do when I read yours?
Lol, job well doneFor example, you're engaged in a pointless argument with me right now, lol.
Your last few responses weren't very "useful" in terms of the discussion going on in this thread, I thought.
Also just wanted to wind you up a bit
I've always found that I'm good at that job!neo-x wrote:Lol, job well doneFor example, you're engaged in a pointless argument with me right now, lol.
Your last few responses weren't very "useful" in terms of the discussion going on in this thread, I thought.
Also just wanted to wind you up a bit
Don't get a head of yourselfI've always found that I'm good at that job!
I hope that was said out of love for a fellow manneo-x wrote:Don't get a head of yourselfI've always found that I'm good at that job!
I should let G speak for himself, but I believe what he's trying to get across is that the Biblical definition of love is given in the Torah. Yeshua backs up this idea.neo-x wrote:Sorry, you are simply mistaken. There is no love outside of Torah? wow! great choice of words. If I follow what Christ said, I do not need any other definition at all.
Okay, there's one body of Mashiach. But what does the Scripture say?KBCid wrote:How many bodies of Christ are there?
Rom 12:5 So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another.
Define where the Jew ends and the gentile begins. Christ preached the same message to both Jew and gentile. He sought to bring all together into the same body with the same rules and government. If I being a believing gentile do not become a brother to the believing Jew then what am I?
Here is Gods position on being Jewish;
Rom 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
Rom 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
Note this reference in acts;
Act 15:3 And being brought on their way by the church, they passed through Phenice and Samaria, declaring the CONVERSION of the Gentiles: and they caused great joy unto all the brethren.
What were the gentiles converted to?
Act 15:8 And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us;
Act 15:9 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
What you may be failing to realise here is where Jews came from. Read this scripture and see the truth;
Act 15:13 And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me:
Act 15:14 Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
Act 15:15 And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
Act 15:16 After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
Act 15:17 That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.
Jews are in fact gentiles... that is where their bloodline originated. The first gentile Abram became Jewish after he showed faith in God. He was not a jew before that time. The difference between a Jew and a gentile is what exactly?
Gen 11:31 And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son's son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram's wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran, and dwelt there.
Gen 12:1 Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
Gen 15:5 And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.
Gen 15:6 And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
Gen 15:7 And he said unto him, I am the LORD that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it.
Gen 17:1 And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the LORD appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect.
Gen 17:7 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
This is the Covenant that formed the first Jew from a gentile. To accept God as the only God and walk before him perfect with a circumcised heart.
The 'token' or outward sign of this covenant as defined by God was;
Gen 17:11 And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
So ultimately a Jew is not a Jew because he is circumcised on the outside but rather as it was written;
Rom 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
Rom 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
Any gentile who fulfills the intent of the covenant that God desires will engage in a covenant just as Abram the gentile did and we will be given a new name just as Abram got and became Abraham;
Rev 2:17 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it.
Rev 3:12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.
Words of wisdom.The truth isn't ALWAYS defined by what the majority of our brothers and sisters believe, but it often has meaning behind it.
I am not saying it doesn't cheez, I am simply saying that to say there is no love outside of Torah, is absurd.I should let G speak for himself, but I believe what he's trying to get across is that the Biblical definition of love is given in the Torah. Yeshua backs up this idea.
I'd also love some examples in scripture to back that point up, because in my opinion it is not the Torah but the NT which gives us biblical definitions of love.neo-x wrote:I am not saying it doesn't cheez, I am simply saying that to say there is no love outside of Torah, is absurd.I should let G speak for himself, but I believe what he's trying to get across is that the Biblical definition of love is given in the Torah. Yeshua backs up this idea.
Well, I think it's really his wording that's the issue. Again, not trying to speak for him, but I BELIEVE what he means to say is that since Biblical love is defined by Torah, then there can't be true Biblical love without it being the love defined in the Torah. Not that one can't show true love for people without being Torah observant.neo-x wrote:I am not saying it doesn't cheez, I am simply saying that to say there is no love outside of Torah, is absurd.
Well, I quoted some Scripture from the Gospels in my earlier post on this point. What Scriptures would you use to back up the idea that love is defined in the NT and not the Torah? because there are a lot of theological issues that come with that idea.Sam1995 wrote:I'd also love some examples in scripture to back that point up, because in my opinion it is not the Torah but the NT which gives us biblical definitions of love.
SB
cheezerrox wrote:Okay, there's one body of Mashiach. But what does the Scripture say?
Galatians 3:28"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Mashiach Yeshua." So, believers aren't Jews. Believers are defined by Mashiach. Now, they don't stop being Jews or Gentiles, but they don't change from one to the other. By saying so you're denying G-d's Oneness. Paul said, Romans 3:29-30"Or is G-d the G-d of Jews only? Is He not the G-d of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since indeed G-d who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is One." If Gentiles cannot believe and be saved without becoming Jews, then G-d is only the G-d of Jews. This is untrue.
Romans 2:28-29 has nothing to do about how people can "become Jewish." People can't become Jewish anymore than a white person can become black or vice versa. It's simply a matter of your blood. Again, you're equating spirituality with Jewishness, which is wrong and anti-Scriptural.
Israel is the people God loves as a concept. The Israel that God loves are spiritual Israel. At no time does God infer that he loves someone because of a genetic makeup. His promise to Abraham for his children did not mean every child in the lineage he would father.cheezerrox wrote: This passage is simply saying that the people who were content to be a part of the chosen people through heritage and to rely on following the commandments outwardly (verse 17) are not truly followers of G-d. If this passage were saying that all people who're unsaved, regardless if they're Hebrew by heritage, are not truly Jewish, then why does Scripture constantly refer to unbelieving Jews as still Jews? And more importantly, how come throughout the whole Tanakh (Old Testament), HaShem CONSTANTLY refers to Israel and Judah as His people whom He loves, and that though they may be unfaithful at times He always calls them back. If they stopped being His people by not believing, they would no longer be His people.
Actually it did not answer the question. A believing gentile can be "converted" and become a child of Abraham as it is written;cheezerrox wrote:And asking, "If I being a believing gentile do not become a brother to the believing Jew then what am I?" is a loaded question, that answers itself, really. You said yourself what you are; a believing Gentile. You most certainly are a brother to a believing Jew; this doesn't make you Jewish any more than it makes him a Gentile.
I am not preaching any type of replacement. The intent from the begining was that the lineage of Gods people is defined by as spiritual lineage. To assert that Gods people are defined by genetics is in oposition to every scripture I have put on the table in these past two posts.cheezerrox wrote:Friend, you are preaching replacement theology.
The original outward covenant was done away with and the genetic lineage linked with that covenant is also done away with since it was also based on the physical.cheezerrox wrote:G-d's covenant people are still the Jews,
I have never claimed to be a genetic Jew and I was not the first to assert that someone from the genetic lineage of Abraham can not be truly Jewish;cheezerrox wrote:and by claiming yourself to be a Jew and any Jew who doesn't believe to be not truly Jewish, you're preaching an extremely offensive and un-Biblical doctrine which sprung up a few centuries after Yeshua's death, when the Gentiles started to outnumber the Jewish believers.
I have not one single bit of intent to be offensive or anti-semitic. Those who are genetically decended from Abraham have the same opportunity as anyone else to be the true children of Abraham and if you are both genetically and spiritually a child of Abraham then I'm sure you will have great rewards from 'our' Father who has in the new covenant determined how any human in existence can take part in the promise originally given to Abraham;cheezerrox wrote:It is anti-semitic, brother. I know you yourself are not anti-semitic, and I'm not claiming you are, but the message you're preaching is, and you need to reflect on what you're saying compared to the Scriptures objectively and honestly, without your presuppositions. You need to make sure you're being humble, and listen to your brothers and sisters in the faith. It says something when the majority of them are telling you you're in serious error. The truth isn't ALWAYS defined by what the majority of our brothers and sisters believe, but it often has meaning behind it.
you are not getting my point. See if this elucidates my point better;neo-x wrote:but thats the point kb, if one becomes a child of abraham, then that is in faith, not race. abraham was neither jew nor israelite and the promise is to those who are in faith, not a family.
people dont become israel, nor physical nor spiritual. they are one in christ, the true vine. and to call that israel is wrong. you are prooftexting ur way to each conclusion, it is a very poor approach, prone to be at fault more because u r reading into the text what u r arguing for
Their ultimate answer to the pork question is "I don't see anything wrong with eating it".RickD wrote:I just came across this podcast at Reasons.org, that has a brief discussion about eating pork. Just thought I'd throw it out there, as we were discussing this before. It's at the 26:04 mark:http://www.reasons.org/podcasts/i-didnt ... n-got-pork