Re: Who made the rule that death is the punishment for sin?
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 11:20 pm
Checkmate
"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
So you desire no rules?outlaw wrote:Furstentum Liechtenstein wrote:Love is of little relevence here, if any. Rules exist to guide behavior. In France, the speed limit is 130km/h; my wife pointed to the center-mounted speedometer and said that I was going over 200. Shortly after, a policeman stopped me and said I was going 184km/h. Upon hearing my Canadian French accent, he softened up and gave me a stern warning but no speeding ticket. He didn't love me, and the law wasn't there to show its love to me. He stopped me because I was breaking the law and then he offered me his grace by not issuing a ticket. Had he decided to fine me, that would not have been from a lack of love either.outlaw wrote:I wouldn't call someone who makes those types of rules loving, these are not rules that a loving god would make in my opinion. They're also not what I would call just, because if these rules were just back then they should also be just now.
As for the rules for slave owners not being those that a ''loving god would make'' the problem you have is that they were made by a loving and just God. God's justice is what is being expressed by the rules (and penalties) in Exodus & Leviticus. Perfect love is also just and requires accountability from the lawbreaker. In other words, you break the rule, you pay the fine. What kind of pinhead god would make a rule then say to slave rule breakers, ''Well, OK, since I love you, I'll let you off the hook'' or what kind of man-made god would say to slave owners, ''OK, you killed your slave but I know you just flew off the handle and didn't mean to strangle him''...
The punishments were there to correct wayward slaves, and they are just. They set limits on the slave owner's fury and provide consequences should he abuse his charges.
FLProbably the same type of pinhead god that makes the rule that says death is the punishment for sin, then say to rule breakers, "Well, OK. since i love you, i'll let you off the hook"What kind of pinhead god would make a rule then say to slave rule breakers, ''Well, OK, since I love you, I'll let you off the hook''
Yes checkmateB. W. wrote:So you desire no rules?outlaw wrote:Furstentum Liechtenstein wrote:Love is of little relevence here, if any. Rules exist to guide behavior. In France, the speed limit is 130km/h; my wife pointed to the center-mounted speedometer and said that I was going over 200. Shortly after, a policeman stopped me and said I was going 184km/h. Upon hearing my Canadian French accent, he softened up and gave me a stern warning but no speeding ticket. He didn't love me, and the law wasn't there to show its love to me. He stopped me because I was breaking the law and then he offered me his grace by not issuing a ticket. Had he decided to fine me, that would not have been from a lack of love either.outlaw wrote:I wouldn't call someone who makes those types of rules loving, these are not rules that a loving god would make in my opinion. They're also not what I would call just, because if these rules were just back then they should also be just now.
As for the rules for slave owners not being those that a ''loving god would make'' the problem you have is that they were made by a loving and just God. God's justice is what is being expressed by the rules (and penalties) in Exodus & Leviticus. Perfect love is also just and requires accountability from the lawbreaker. In other words, you break the rule, you pay the fine. What kind of pinhead god would make a rule then say to slave rule breakers, ''Well, OK, since I love you, I'll let you off the hook'' or what kind of man-made god would say to slave owners, ''OK, you killed your slave but I know you just flew off the handle and didn't mean to strangle him''...
The punishments were there to correct wayward slaves, and they are just. They set limits on the slave owner's fury and provide consequences should he abuse his charges.
FLProbably the same type of pinhead god that makes the rule that says death is the punishment for sin, then say to rule breakers, "Well, OK. since i love you, i'll let you off the hook"What kind of pinhead god would make a rule then say to slave rule breakers, ''Well, OK, since I love you, I'll let you off the hook''
Anarchy is the rule then and chaos the norm is what you espouse and desire above all else, is it not?
No Checkmate mate...
You mentioned that you don't hate god and call him a pinhead.
Are you a pinhead for making rules for your own children?
Funny thing about kids, they are free minded beings and you have no problem with allowing them explore their own way and call this just or at least good parenting then turn around a say that God is criminal for doing the same with humanity and going above all good parenting by providing a cure to end chaos and anarchy...
How do you purify gold / precious metals?
Curious, how much are you being paid to write on this forum or are you just here for promoting chaos for free?
-
-
-
No if you understood my analogy correctly i said it would be stupid for me to make a rule for my children knowing they would break it then when they break it, say 'since i love you, ill punish myself instead and let you off the hook'B. W. wrote:Yes checkmate
You can actually see how stupid it is for Outlaw to make a rule TO HIS KIDS and then say 'Well, ok, since i love you, ill let you off the hook" i agree its ridiculous.
But then fail to see it when OUTLAW does it with vicarious redemption, it's the same thing!!! OUTLAW makes the rule about how sinners should be dealt with OUTLAW steps in and says "Well, ok, since i love you, ill let you off the hook" CHECKMATE ALL DAY LONG.
You just proved to yourself how stupid OUTLAW'S plan for redemption is FOR HIS OWN KIDS in your own words.
Might as well close this thread my point has been made.
-
-
-
The Crossoutlaw wrote:...No if you understood my analogy correctly i said it would be stupid for me to make a rule for my children knowing they would break it then when they break it, say 'since i love you, ill punish myself instead and let you off the hook'
I see that it would be stupid for god to do it why would i do it myself? your comprehension is poor did you finish primary school?
In your attempt to make me look like a hypocrite you ballsed it up and made yourself look silly.
Luke 23:34 Then Jesus said, "Father, forgive (release) them, for they do not know what they do." And they divided His garments and cast lots…Isa 53:1 Who has believed our report? And to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed?
Isa 53:2-3 For He shall grow up before Him as a tender plant, And as a root out of dry ground. He has no form or comeliness; And when we see Him, There is no beauty that we should desire Him. 3 He is despised and rejected by men, A Man of sorrows and acquainted with grief. And we hid, as it were, our faces from Him; He was despised, and we did not esteem Him.
Isa 53:4-5 Surely He has borne our griefs And carried our sorrows; Yet we esteemed Him stricken, Smitten by God, and afflicted. 5 But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; The chastisement for our peace was upon Him, And by His stripes we are healed.
Isa 53:6-7 All we like sheep have gone astray; We have turned, every one, to his own way; And the LORD has laid on Him the iniquity of us all. 7 He was oppressed and He was afflicted, Yet He opened not His mouth; He was led as a lamb to the slaughter, And as a sheep before its shearers is silent, So He opened not His mouth.
Isa 53:8 He was taken from prison and from judgment, And who will declare His generation? For He was cut off from the land of the living; For the transgressions of My people He was stricken. 9 And they made His grave with the wicked— But with the rich at His death, Because He had done no violence, Nor was any deceit in His mouth.
Isa 53:10-12 Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise Him; He has put Him to grief. When You make His soul an offering for sin, He shall see His seed, He shall prolong His days, And the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in His hand. 11 He shall see the labor of His soul, and be satisfied. By His knowledge My righteous Servant shall justify many, For He shall bear their iniquities. 12 Therefore I will divide Him a portion with the great, And He shall divide the spoil with the strong, Because He poured out His soul unto death, And He was numbered with the transgressors, And He bore the sin of many, And made intercession for the transgressors. NKJV
What was it that FL said about debating with atheists?outlaw wrote:Checkmate
Checkmate indeed! Now who's gonna clean up the monkey poop?Furstentum Liechtenstein wrote:
Debating with an atheist is like playing chess with a monkey: no matter how good you are, the monkey will knock over all the pieces, defecate on the board and claim victory.
RickD wrote:What was it that FL said about debating with atheists?outlaw wrote:Checkmate
Checkmate indeed! Now who's gonna clean up the monkey poop?Furstentum Liechtenstein wrote:
Debating with an atheist is like playing chess with a monkey: no matter how good you are, the monkey will knock over all the pieces, defecate on the board and claim victory.
It is a woman's job, Excellency...but since you're the Queen, you can order Melanie to do the clean up.1over137 wrote:I guess some woman.
Ohh FL your attempt atFurstentum Liechtenstein wrote:RickD wrote:What was it that FL said about debating with atheists?outlaw wrote:Checkmate
Checkmate indeed! Now who's gonna clean up the monkey poop?Furstentum Liechtenstein wrote:
Debating with an atheist is like playing chess with a monkey: no matter how good you are, the monkey will knock over all the pieces, defecate on the board and claim victory.It is a woman's job, Excellency...but since you're the Queen, you can order Melanie to do the clean up.1over137 wrote:I guess some woman.
FL
I have read Dr.Collins book and recommend it to anyone.Nicki wrote:Not sure if you're checking this again, outlaw, but thanks for discussing this with us for so long. I think there's been some unnecessary unpleasantness on both sides though.
I've been reading a book by Francis S. Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, who came to believe in God and become a Christian because of the complexity he discovered (for himself at least) in both the origins of the universe and the microscopic workings within living things. He does believe that the evidence points overwhelmingly towards the Big Bang and evolution as God's method of creation, but I think he would disagree that we are born atheists. He points to the universal search for God in all known cultures and the sense of right and wrong which has been basically the same in everyone everywhere - even when there would be no evolutionary advantage in it. God seems to have given us consciences and a need for him.
He has also given us a certain amount of intelligence but he says, 'My ways are higher than your ways and my thoughts higher than your thoughts.' It seems to me that many things God's made are far more complex than anything people can make. Similarly, his salvation plan might seem stupid to some but maybe some things are beyond our limited intelligence. Maybe there's been more going on in the spiritual realm than we know of, unlimited by time and space and so on. The idea of (eternal) death being punishment is only part of the picture - there's also the idea of Jesus defeating death for us when he died and rose again - the Christ Victor view. The Bible also says that God disciplines those he loves, his children, to keep us on the right path - not with eternal death though.
As far as the slavery thing - that's hard to answer. I think slaves were just a fact of life back then but the Bible certainly doesn't say we should have slaves. As others have said, it was Christians who pushed for the abolition of slavery in more recent times because they could see it was incompatible with the Bible as a whole and with God's nature of valuing every person. There was also the issue of young children dying without having heard of Jesus - I don't think they necessarily go to hell; I think God being just judges us based on what we've done about what we know of him; which in the case of a young child is not a lot. But it's better to know God in this life; Francis Collins describes the distance he felt from God once he was convinced of God's existence but aware of his imperfect nature and God's holiness - until he investigated the writings about Jesus Christ and eventually surrendered to him.
Best wishes to you and anyone else reading in your search.