Support Gay Marriage Cakes

[Danieltwotwenty]

Edit. I think it was Desmond Tutu who said

If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.

So, if you believe that, why are you choosing to be an oppressor? There is only one way to truly conquer oppression, and it isn't with trying to win via punishing or oppressing those who disagree with you. Look at the life of Jesus.

It is not oppression to stop people discriminating against those who don't deserve it.

So when we see children being killed in the streets we should do nothing?

I see you are coming across to my pacifist side.

[Danieltwotwenty]

I also take your inability to answer as confirmation that it is discrimination towards gay people to not write a message on the cake and further more it is confirmation of the logical conclusion of discrimination based on your belief system, being; creating absurd situations like the one I presented.

Explain for me the relevance of your question, compared to the one you originally asked which was also quite dumb.

Oh.

When I clicked on the notification to see your reply to me I saw your response to daniel instead. Thinking that was your response to me.

Nessa. Please. The men are talking here. How bout you make us some sammiches, so we men can discuss this. And a couple of beers too. Daniel will have a Foster's.


Good to see you back Nessa. I missed you.

How did you ever become a married man?

[Kurieuo]

Edit. I think it was Desmond Tutu who said

If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.

So, if you believe that, why are you choosing to be an oppressor? There is only one way to truly conquer oppression, and it isn't with trying to win via punishing or oppressing those who disagree with you. Look at the life of Jesus.

It is not oppression to stop people discriminating against those who don't deserve it.

So when we see children being killed in the streets we should do nothing?

I see you are coming across to my pacifist side.

We're talking about cakes here. Now you're moving the goal posts. In cases of violence, you might recall what I wrote a few posts back. This isn't a debating game to me.

I often design websites for people. If a person came to me, wanting me to provide them with a website that is an activist gay website, and I refused, what should my punishment be Dan?

[RickD]

I also take your inability to answer as confirmation that it is discrimination towards gay people to not write a message on the cake and further more it is confirmation of the logical conclusion of discrimination based on your belief system, being; creating absurd situations like the one I presented.

Explain for me the relevance of your question, compared to the one you originally asked which was also quite dumb.

Oh.

When I clicked on the notification to see your reply to me I saw your response to daniel instead. Thinking that was your response to me.

Nessa. Please. The men are talking here. How bout you make us some sammiches, so we men can discuss this. And a couple of beers too. Daniel will have a Foster's.


Good to see you back Nessa. I missed you.

How did you ever become a married man?

Well, It all started with a cake I had baked for our wedding...

[RickD]

kurieuo wrote:

I often design websites for people. If a person came to me, wanting me to provide them with a website that is an activist gay website, and I refused, what should my punishment be Dan?

I think a fair punishment for that, would be for you to be sent to a penal island country, to spend the rest of your days surrounded by clueless liberals.

How'd I do?

[Danieltwotwenty]

Edit. I think it was Desmond Tutu who said

If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.

So, if you believe that, why are you choosing to be an oppressor? There is only one way to truly conquer oppression, and it isn't with trying to win via punishing or oppressing those who disagree with you. Look at the life of Jesus.

It is not oppression to stop people discriminating against those who don't deserve it.

So when we see children being killed in the streets we should do nothing?

I see you are coming across to my pacifist side.

We're talking about cakes here. Now you're moving the goal posts. In cases of violence, you might recall what I wrote a few posts back. This isn't a debating game to me.

I often design websites for people. If a person came to me, wanting me to provide them with a website that is an activist gay website, and I refused, what should my punishment be Dan?

It was a joke K....

Under the anti discrimination laws you could be charged and rightfully so.

https://www.humanrights.gov.au/employer ... ation-laws

But you could just give no reason for turning it down and that would be acceptable.

[Danieltwotwenty]

kurieuo wrote:

I often design websites for people. If a person came to me, wanting me to provide them with a website that is an activist gay website, and I refused, what should my punishment be Dan?

I think a fair punishment for that, would be for you to be sent to a penal island country, to spend the rest of your days surrounded by clueless liberals.

How'd I do?

So not Queensland then?

[RickD]

Edit. I think it was Desmond Tutu who said

So, if you believe that, why are you choosing to be an oppressor? There is only one way to truly conquer oppression, and it isn't with trying to win via punishing or oppressing those who disagree with you. Look at the life of Jesus.

It is not oppression to stop people discriminating against those who don't deserve it.

So when we see children being killed in the streets we should do nothing?

I see you are coming across to my pacifist side.

We're talking about cakes here. Now you're moving the goal posts. In cases of violence, you might recall what I wrote a few posts back. This isn't a debating game to me.

I often design websites for people. If a person came to me, wanting me to provide them with a website that is an activist gay website, and I refused, what should my punishment be Dan?

Under the anti discrimination laws you could be charged and rightfully so.

https://www.humanrights.gov.au/employer ... ation-laws

But you could just give no reason for turning it down and that would be acceptable.

After this entire thread, you STILL don't understand the issue.

Seriously Dan?

THERES NO DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION!!!

The sexual orientation of the person is irrelevant. It's the message. A heterosexual person could come to Kurieuo, trying to get the same request for a gay activist website.

ITS THE MESSAGE. NOT THE SEXUAL PREFERENCE OF THE PERSON!!!

[Danieltwotwenty]

So, if you believe that, why are you choosing to be an oppressor? There is only one way to truly conquer oppression, and it isn't with trying to win via punishing or oppressing those who disagree with you. Look at the life of Jesus.

It is not oppression to stop people discriminating against those who don't deserve it.

So when we see children being killed in the streets we should do nothing?

I see you are coming across to my pacifist side.

We're talking about cakes here. Now you're moving the goal posts. In cases of violence, you might recall what I wrote a few posts back. This isn't a debating game to me.

I often design websites for people. If a person came to me, wanting me to provide them with a website that is an activist gay website, and I refused, what should my punishment be Dan?

Under the anti discrimination laws you could be charged and rightfully so.

https://www.humanrights.gov.au/employer ... ation-laws

But you could just give no reason for turning it down and that would be acceptable.

After this entire thread, you STILL don't understand the issue.

Seriously Dan?

THERES NO DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION!!!

The sexual orientation of the person is irrelevant. It's the message. A heterosexual person could come to Kurieuo, trying to get the same request for a gay activist website.

ITS THE MESSAGE. NOT THE SEXUAL PREFERENCE OF THE PERSON!!!

I DO UNDERSTAND RICK!!!! SHOUTING AT ME WILL NOT CHANGE MY MIND. CAPPPPPPPSLOCK!!!

Now, discriminating against the message is the same as discriminating against the person, there is no difference at all.

If the person is straight you are still discriminating against gay people, it makes no difference.

[Kurieuo]

Edit. I think it was Desmond Tutu who said

So, if you believe that, why are you choosing to be an oppressor? There is only one way to truly conquer oppression, and it isn't with trying to win via punishing or oppressing those who disagree with you. Look at the life of Jesus.

It is not oppression to stop people discriminating against those who don't deserve it.

So when we see children being killed in the streets we should do nothing?

I see you are coming across to my pacifist side.

We're talking about cakes here. Now you're moving the goal posts. In cases of violence, you might recall what I wrote a few posts back. This isn't a debating game to me.

I often design websites for people. If a person came to me, wanting me to provide them with a website that is an activist gay website, and I refused, what should my punishment be Dan?

Under the anti discrimination laws you could be charged and rightfully so.

https://www.humanrights.gov.au/employer ... ation-laws

But you could just give no reason for turning it down and that would be acceptable.

Notwithstanding I don't see any discrimination against a person, you'd consider my non-compliance to create an activist gay website as discrimination, would have me charged, "and rightfully so".

Only, you say, unless I remain silent about my reasons.
This speaks volumes to me.

Please, anyone reading, pause... and let what Dan has just said sink in.

Thanks Dan, for showing where you stand. But, I must say I'm quite repulsed and offended that you'd have me (and other Christians and people) punished for holding to their beliefs.

How ironic that you claim to be Christian, and yet would join the world in oppressing of Christians.
If you can't see how extreme your views are, then here I rest.

[Danieltwotwenty]

So, if you believe that, why are you choosing to be an oppressor? There is only one way to truly conquer oppression, and it isn't with trying to win via punishing or oppressing those who disagree with you. Look at the life of Jesus.

It is not oppression to stop people discriminating against those who don't deserve it.

So when we see children being killed in the streets we should do nothing?

I see you are coming across to my pacifist side.

We're talking about cakes here. Now you're moving the goal posts. In cases of violence, you might recall what I wrote a few posts back. This isn't a debating game to me.

I often design websites for people. If a person came to me, wanting me to provide them with a website that is an activist gay website, and I refused, what should my punishment be Dan?

Under the anti discrimination laws you could be charged and rightfully so.

https://www.humanrights.gov.au/employer ... ation-laws

But you could just give no reason for turning it down and that would be acceptable.

Notwithstanding, I don't see any discrimination against a person, you'd consider my non-compliance to create an activist gay website as discrimination, would have me charged, "and rightfully so".

Only, you say, I remain silent about my reasons.
That speaks volumes to me.

Please, anyone reading, pause... and let what has just been said sink in.

Thanks Dan, for showing where you stand.
I must say I'm quite repulsed and offended that you'd have me punished for my beliefs.

How ironic that you claim to be Christian, and yet would join the world in oppressing of Christians.
If you can't see how extreme your views are, then here I'll rest.

You have the right to refuse any service you provide, provided you are not discriminating. If you don't disclose the reason, you cannot be charged with discrimination!! It's just logical.

But if you act like a turd and tell them why, then yes you can be charged, because you have been caught discriminating.

If you can't see how you views are extreme in oppressing minorities and how this leads to a society that murders millions, I cannot help you.


You think my views are extreme because I support Christian persecution (which I don't), I think your views are extreme for allowing and supporting Christians to persecute others, which in my opinion is worse!!

[Danieltwotwenty]

Just so there is no confusion for you Rick, I will put it into a scenario.

There are two couples one heterosexual (Sam and Samantha) and one homosexual (Sam and Sam), both go to buy a wedding cake with the exact same message on it "Sam & Sam". The cake maker makes the cake with the message for the heterosexual couple but does not for the homosexual couple. Obviously the message is the same in both instances, it is not offensive in anyway shape or form, so we must conclude that the message is not the reason for the discrimination, but instead that couples sexual orientation that is being discriminated against.

[Kurieuo]

Recommended for some perspective, to those who are blinded in our current schismatic-loving secular society against Christians, who just don't get that "Christian disagreement" does not equal "hate or persecution".


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JciVfnR2lis

[Kurieuo]

If you can't see how you views are extreme in oppressing minorities and how this leads to a society that murders millions, I cannot help you.

You think my views are extreme because I support Christian persecution (which I don't), I think your views are extreme for allowing and supporting Christians to persecute others, which in my opinion is worse!!

It is clear you're clouded by emotion and irrationality common to secular humanistic thinking that seeks to destroy Christianity if you think refusing to participate in gay activism based upon belief is persecuting others. It is absurd, and I can't believe Christians believe such hogwash. I have nothing more to say to you.

[neo-x]

If you can't see how you views are extreme in oppressing minorities and how this leads to a society that murders millions, I cannot help you.

You think my views are extreme because I support Christian persecution (which I don't), I think your views are extreme for allowing and supporting Christians to persecute others, which in my opinion is worse!!

It is clear you're clouded by emotion and irrationality common to secular humanistic thinking that seeks to destroy Christianity if you think refusing to participate in gay activism based upon belief is persecuting others. It is absurd, and I can't believe Christians believe such hogwash. I have nothing more to say to you.

Well, at least one Christian lives and sees this hogwash, and faces it and sees why it makes sense.