Evidence for God from Science

crochet1949 wrote:

Kurieuo wrote:Sure you both aren't actually big hairy men?

Well -- my husband isn't into 'big hairy men' -- I'm pretty sure that I'm a female (the correct plumbing is there)


And -- You Could be a voluptuous blond who's married to another woman. We're all sort of anonymous around here. Unless some of ya'll know each other.

Well, according to Facebook there are 51 different genders.

I must be out of touch in thinking that we just assign gender based upon the sex of being male or female.

Kurieuo wrote:

crochet1949 wrote:

Kurieuo wrote:Sure you both aren't actually big hairy men?

Well -- my husband isn't into 'big hairy men' -- I'm pretty sure that I'm a female (the correct plumbing is there)


And -- You Could be a voluptuous blond who's married to another woman. We're all sort of anonymous around here. Unless some of ya'll know each other.

Well, according to Facebook there are 51 different genders.

I must be out of touch in thinking that we just assign gender based upon the sex of being male or female.

No, we are not out of touch -- when a baby is born -- it Usually is either male or female which is observed as soon as that baby is born. Once in a while there is a combination -- but Mostly - it's either male or female or neuter. 'Society' comes up with the rest of it. In Genesis -- God created them male and female. How the other happens , well, this is not a perfect world -- any more.

crochet1949 wrote:

Audie wrote:Great clues!

So -- does that clear up any previous confusion? We're Both women, right?!

Whew. i was so confused for a while! Two women. You, me.
Or, me, you.

Kinda like an old New Yorker cartoon, There is a play; an actor is down.

Another actor anxiously calls out to the crowd, "Is there a Doctor in the house?"

A gentleman in the audience half rises to his feet, asking himself,

"Am I a doctor?"*

*For those who are not familiar with existentialism, that is it.

Audie wrote:

crochet1949 wrote:

Audie wrote:Great clues!

So -- does that clear up any previous confusion? We're Both women, right?!

Whew. i was so confused for a while! Two women. You, me.
Or, me, you.

Kinda like an old New Yorker cartoon, There is a play; an actor is down.

Another actor anxiously calls out to the crowd, "Is there a Doctor in the house?"

A gentleman in the audience half rises to his feet, asking himself,

"Am I a doctor?"*

*For those who are not familiar with existentialism, that is it.

Okay -- now that we've established that we're both women and Not two temperamental men -- can we get on with life?

crochet1949 wrote:

Audie wrote:

crochet1949 wrote:

Audie wrote:Great clues!

So -- does that clear up any previous confusion? We're Both women, right?!

Whew. i was so confused for a while! Two women. You, me.
Or, me, you.

Kinda like an old New Yorker cartoon, There is a play; an actor is down.

Another actor anxiously calls out to the crowd, "Is there a Doctor in the house?"

A gentleman in the audience half rises to his feet, asking himself,

"Am I a doctor?"*

*For those who are not familiar with existentialism, that is it.

Okay -- now that we've established that we're both women and Not two temperamental men -- can we get on with life?

Whoever started it is probably a Trump henchman.

So Now we're bringing politics into the picture -- hopefully a miracle Will happen and Trump Will get elected and Then a few people can end up going to prison -- which is where a few people Should be.

Philip wrote:OK, we're WAY off track of this thread. Let's get it back to miracle healings today, please.

Hey -- you Noticed. Ya Really want to keep 'this' going?!

crochet1949 wrote:

Philip wrote:OK, we're WAY off track of this thread. Let's get it back to miracle healings today, please.

Hey -- you Noticed. Ya Really want to keep 'this' going?!

This nation needs a Miraculous Healing Today... so not so off the mark after all!
-
-
-

B. W. wrote:

crochet1949 wrote:

Philip wrote:OK, we're WAY off track of this thread. Let's get it back to miracle healings today, please.

Hey -- you Noticed. Ya Really want to keep 'this' going?!

This nation needs a Miraculous Healing Today... so not so off the mark after all!
-
-
-

Very true -- we need to pray that we will accept whatever God's Will IS. Sometimes healing comes in This world and sometimes not until Heaven.

And we need to remember that at some point in the future -- Christ Will be the righteous leader we are really looking for. That will happen for 1,000 years. And I already know that lots of people don't believe in that 'stuff'. A passage that talks about that is in Zechariah 14:4 and the following verses. Also Revelation 20:4 b and 7 a.

The most important 'miraculous' healing CAN take place within a person -- accepting Jesus Christ as their personal Savior -- Because the biggest miracle of Jesus Christ's bodily resurrection from the dead has taken place. Accepting Him will 'heal' a person Spiritually. The person will become a 'new creation in Christ'. It 'heals' the broken relationship that took place Way back in the Garden of Eden. A 'nation' is made up of individual People.

If anyone is interested, I'm attaching a copy of a paper I wrote a few months ago on the notion of Christ as healer. Fleshes out the ideas a little more, I think.

Jac3510 wrote:If anyone is interested, I'm attaching a copy of a paper I wrote a few months ago on the notion of Christ as healer. Fleshes out the ideas a little more, I think.

It won't come through for me -- I clicked on 'open' and it Tried but wouldn't.

crochet1949 wrote:

Jac3510 wrote:If anyone is interested, I'm attaching a copy of a paper I wrote a few months ago on the notion of Christ as healer. Fleshes out the ideas a little more, I think.

It won't come through for me -- I clicked on 'open' and it Tried but wouldn't.

I've continued to try Everything -- Nothing.

I wonder what that's about. PM me your email address and I'll email you a copy. :-/

Jac3510 wrote:I wonder what that's about. PM me your email address and I'll email you a copy. :-/

Thanks for emailing me a copy -- for whatever reason -- the article won't print without shutting down my computer.
But at least it's in readable form. That's a lot to read from computer screen. Can you possibly do a quick summary?!