Evidence for God from Science

I really can't believe you guys are mocking Neo's situation.

Danieltwotwenty wrote: I really can't believe you guys are mocking Neo's situation.

Mocking is definitely the wrong word. I can't believe you think we are actually being cruel to Neo.

RickD wrote:

Danieltwotwenty wrote: I really can't believe you guys are mocking Neo's situation.

Mocking is definitely the wrong word. I can't believe you think we are actually being cruel to Neo.

I know if I was in Neo's situation and I read the last thing K wroteI would definitely see that as mocking me.

Danieltwotwenty wrote:

RickD wrote:

Danieltwotwenty wrote: I really can't believe you guys are mocking Neo's situation.

Mocking is definitely the wrong word. I can't believe you think we are actually being cruel to Neo.

I know if I was in Neo's situation and I read the last thing K wroteI would definitely see that as mocking me.

Well then, thankfully Neo doesn't get upset at every little thing like you do. Actually, I don't know anybody who gets as upset as you do, over something like that.

RickD wrote:Actually, I don't know anybody who gets as upset as you do, over something like that.

See! You've forgotten me already..

Nessa wrote:

RickD wrote:Actually, I don't know anybody who gets as upset as you do, over something like that.

See! You've forgotten me already..

No, even 1,000 women with pms don't get upset like Daniel does.

RickD wrote:
Actually, I don't know anybody who gets as upset as you do, over something like that.

Ness: See! You've forgotten me already..

Yes, but Ness is, well, you know... one of THOSE!

RickD wrote:

Nessa wrote:

RickD wrote:Actually, I don't know anybody who gets as upset as you do, over something like that.

See! You've forgotten me already..

No, even 1,000 women with pms don't get upset like Daniel does.

I guess I better not ask him if he really lives in a box under a bridge in Toowoomba like FL says...

RickD wrote:

Danieltwotwenty wrote:

RickD wrote:

Danieltwotwenty wrote: I really can't believe you guys are mocking Neo's situation.

Mocking is definitely the wrong word. I can't believe you think we are actually being cruel to Neo.

I know if I was in Neo's situation and I read the last thing K wroteI would definitely see that as mocking me.

Well then, thankfully Neo doesn't get upset at every little thing like you do. Actually, I don't know anybody who gets as upset as you do, over something like that.

Why do you presume I am upset? I think it is disgusting and deplorable, but I don't get upset over it, I have come to expect to see the worst in people, and even more so expect it from Christians, including myself, what's the point of getting upset about it, nothing is going to change.

Calling something out for what it is, is not being upset.

RickD wrote:

Nessa wrote:

RickD wrote:Actually, I don't know anybody who gets as upset as you do, over something like that.

See! You've forgotten me already..

No, even 1,000 women with pms don't get upset like Daniel does.

See this, once again it is a vain attempt to paint me as irrational and emotional to disparage and disregard anything I have to say. These are the dirty tactics and hidden agenda of the far right.

But seriously though, stop doing it, it just makes you look foolish.

Danieltwotwenty wrote:

RickD wrote:

Danieltwotwenty wrote: I really can't believe you guys are mocking Neo's situation.

Mocking is definitely the wrong word. I can't believe you think we are actually being cruel to Neo.

I know if I was in Neo's situation and I read the last thing K wroteI would definitely see that as mocking me.

Mocking Neo-X? Oh, grow some skin and get some perspective Dan. More like mocking your previous comments.
You'll condone persecution of your brothers and sisters, but then baulk on that, seriously?

You don't like my comments, I don't like someone who calls themself a Christian, but then have their brothers and sisters in Christ charged and punished for following Christ. Due to that, I see you as a danger and insult to Christ's church, and feel quite seriously saddened by you.

I hope you can take a good look over yourself, gain some much needed perspective. I'd expect your views from non-Christians, but not a fellow Christian. You know where the door is if you can't stand my type, since I condone Christians who in your eyes will be responsible millions of deaths simply for sticking to their beliefs.

I'll simply leave you with one verse that I think you should pay careful consideration to.

Romans 10:2 "And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God."

Maybe you should take heed of that verse K, I don't think it means what you want it to.

I will never condone Christians persecuting people or anybody else for that matter, they are conforming to the pattern of this world and should rightfully be pursued by the law as you would any other criminal action.

I do find it hilarious and very telling that you tell me to grow a thicker skin when you make light of someone's real life or death situation, but baulk at Christians being sued for not baking a cake or what have you and jump up and down because of their perceived "persecution". I don't think you would know real persecution if it jumped up and bit you in the butt.

Danieltwotwenty wrote:I will never condone Christians persecuting people or anybody else for that matter...

Yes, I expect you think as much, but you have been blinded Dan. The evidence to the contrary can be found by anyone who cares to read in your previous posts in this thread.

K wrote:

D220 wrote:

Kurieuo wrote:We're talking about cakes here. Now you're moving the goal posts. In cases of violence, you might recall what I wrote a few posts back. This isn't a debating game to me.

I often design websites for people. If a person came to me, wanting me to provide them with a website that is an activist gay website, and I refused, what should my punishment be Dan?

Under the anti discrimination laws you could be charged and rightfully so.

https://www.humanrights.gov.au/employer ... ation-laws

But you could just give no reason for turning it down and that would be acceptable.

Notwithstanding I don't see any discrimination against a person, you'd consider my non-compliance to create an activist gay website as discrimination, would have me charged, "and rightfully so".

Only, you say, unless I remain silent about my reasons.
This speaks volumes to me.

Please, anyone reading, pause... and let what Dan has just said sink in.

Thanks Dan, for showing where you stand. But, I must say I'm quite repulsed and offended that you'd have me (and other Christians and people) punished for holding to their beliefs.

How ironic that you claim to be Christian, and yet would join the world in oppressing of Christians.
If you can't see how extreme your views are, then here I rest.

Dan wrote:If you can't see how you views are extreme [condoning someone not making a cake with a pro-gay marriage message due to their moral beliefs, or not making a pro-gay activist website] in oppressing minorities and how this leads to a society that murders millions, I cannot help you.

You think my views are extreme because I support Christian persecution (which I don't [unless they don't remain silent with their Christian beliefs or go against following Christ when someone classified in a "minority" group asks them to do so]), I think your views are extreme for allowing and supporting Christians to persecute others, which in my opinion is worse!! (square brackets mine)

Your words above, quite clearly reveal to me, you support persecution of Christians, while you think you don't.

I don't support Christian persecution, I don't agree with your reasoning for allowing Christians to persecute others, it's as simple as that.