Evidence for God from Science

DBowling wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:19 am

Stu wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:43 pm

DBowling wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:16 am Let me make it very simple for you and point out some specific differences in our two videos.

In my video, the boat is travelling on water away from the camera.
The camera stays zoomed in on boat the whole time (no zooming in and zooming out)
As the boat approaches the horizon, the bottom of the boat gradually disappears while the top of the boat is clearly visible. And the camera stays zoomed in on the boat the whole time.

In your video, the bottle never moves.
In your video, the bottle never approaches the horizon,
In your video the camera does not stay zoomed in on the bottle the whole time (instead it zooms in and out)

So there is nothing at all similar between your bottle video and my boat video.
The only thing that has been debunked is your false assertion that any of your videos are the "exact same thing" as my video of the boat going over the horizon.

I guess another possibility is you just don't understand what "exact same thing" really means.

Wow, ok, the reason your boat goes over the "horizon" is because the camera is FULLY ZOOMED in, it cannot zoom in any further. Hence ANGULAR RESOLUTION.

Wow right back at you...
You really have no clue what you are talking about do you?
Do you even know what "angular resolution" is?

Angular resolution describes the ability of any image-forming device such as an optical or radio telescope, a microscope, a camera, or an eye, to distinguish small details of an object, thereby making it a major determinant of image resolution.

Angular resolution involves the ability of an image forming device to enhance image resolution (ie focus or zoom in) on an object.

So let's try again.
The reason angular resolution has nothing to do with the boat video is...
The... camera... stays... zoomed... in... on... the... boat... the... whole... time...

No zooming in and out... the boat is visible the whole time...
Until the bottom of the boat disappears as the boat goes over the horizon and the camera loses line of site with the bottom of the boat.

This is the reason why NONE of your videos are the "exact same thing" as the video of the boat going over the horizon.
Your videos all zoom in and zoom out and the "resolution" of the image changes dramatically as the camera zooms in and zooms out.

In the video of the boat going over the horizon The camera stays zoomed in on the boat and the boat is clearly visible the whole time.

Stu wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 2:18 am

DBowling wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:19 am

Stu wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:43 pm

DBowling wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:16 am Let me make it very simple for you and point out some specific differences in our two videos.

In my video, the boat is travelling on water away from the camera.
The camera stays zoomed in on boat the whole time (no zooming in and zooming out)
As the boat approaches the horizon, the bottom of the boat gradually disappears while the top of the boat is clearly visible. And the camera stays zoomed in on the boat the whole time.

In your video, the bottle never moves.
In your video, the bottle never approaches the horizon,
In your video the camera does not stay zoomed in on the bottle the whole time (instead it zooms in and out)

So there is nothing at all similar between your bottle video and my boat video.
The only thing that has been debunked is your false assertion that any of your videos are the "exact same thing" as my video of the boat going over the horizon.

I guess another possibility is you just don't understand what "exact same thing" really means.

Wow, ok, the reason your boat goes over the "horizon" is because the camera is FULLY ZOOMED in, it cannot zoom in any further. Hence ANGULAR RESOLUTION.

Wow right back at you...
You really have no clue what you are talking about do you?
Do you even know what "angular resolution" is?

Angular resolution describes the ability of any image-forming device such as an optical or radio telescope, a microscope, a camera, or an eye, to distinguish small details of an object, thereby making it a major determinant of image resolution.

Angular resolution involves the ability of an image forming device to enhance image resolution (ie focus or zoom in) on an object.

So let's try again.
The reason angular resolution has nothing to do with the boat video is...
The... camera... stays... zoomed... in... on... the... boat... the... whole... time...

No zooming in and out... the boat is visible the whole time...
Until the bottom of the boat disappears as the boat goes over the horizon and the camera loses line of site with the bottom of the boat.

This is the reason why NONE of your videos are the "exact same thing" as the video of the boat going over the horizon.
Your videos all zoom in and zoom out and the "resolution" of the image changes dramatically as the camera zooms in and zooms out.

In the video of the boat going over the horizon The camera stays zoomed in on the boat and the boat is clearly visible the whole time.

Sorry but you have no idea what you are talking about.

You continue to fail to take the DISTANCE at which the boats are. You just hammer on about the boat being zoomed in on. It doesn't matter if the boat is followed over the curve or is zoomed in on, if there is a horizon over which the boats go you shouldn't be able to zoom in on them.

People have done what you say with a camera, follow it zoomed in over the supposed horizon until the bottom is missing. Then they put the camera down and use a more powerful telescope. Guess what. The full boat comes into view. Hence it is not the horizon that the boat went over.

DBowling wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 2:47 am

Stu wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 2:18 am

DBowling wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:19 am

Stu wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:43 pm

DBowling wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:16 am Let me make it very simple for you and point out some specific differences in our two videos.

In my video, the boat is travelling on water away from the camera.
The camera stays zoomed in on boat the whole time (no zooming in and zooming out)
As the boat approaches the horizon, the bottom of the boat gradually disappears while the top of the boat is clearly visible. And the camera stays zoomed in on the boat the whole time.

In your video, the bottle never moves.
In your video, the bottle never approaches the horizon,
In your video the camera does not stay zoomed in on the bottle the whole time (instead it zooms in and out)

So there is nothing at all similar between your bottle video and my boat video.
The only thing that has been debunked is your false assertion that any of your videos are the "exact same thing" as my video of the boat going over the horizon.

I guess another possibility is you just don't understand what "exact same thing" really means.

Wow, ok, the reason your boat goes over the "horizon" is because the camera is FULLY ZOOMED in, it cannot zoom in any further. Hence ANGULAR RESOLUTION.

Wow right back at you...
You really have no clue what you are talking about do you?
Do you even know what "angular resolution" is?

Angular resolution describes the ability of any image-forming device such as an optical or radio telescope, a microscope, a camera, or an eye, to distinguish small details of an object, thereby making it a major determinant of image resolution.

Angular resolution involves the ability of an image forming device to enhance image resolution (ie focus or zoom in) on an object.

So let's try again.
The reason angular resolution has nothing to do with the boat video is...
The... camera... stays... zoomed... in... on... the... boat... the... whole... time...

No zooming in and out... the boat is visible the whole time...
Until the bottom of the boat disappears as the boat goes over the horizon and the camera loses line of site with the bottom of the boat.

This is the reason why NONE of your videos are the "exact same thing" as the video of the boat going over the horizon.
Your videos all zoom in and zoom out and the "resolution" of the image changes dramatically as the camera zooms in and zooms out.

In the video of the boat going over the horizon The camera stays zoomed in on the boat and the boat is clearly visible the whole time.

Sorry but you have no idea what you are talking about.

Do you understand the difference between resolution and line of site?

You continue to fail to take the DISTANCE at which the boats are. You just hammer on about the boat being zoomed in on. It doesn't matter if the boat is followed over the curve or is zoomed in on, if there is a horizon over which the boats go you shouldn't be able to zoom in on them.

When a camera is zoomed in on a boat as it goes over the horizon, and line of site to the bottom of the boat is obstructed due to the curvature of the earth then no amount of zooming will cause the bottom of the boat to appear as long as line of site to the bottom of the boat is obstructed

People have done what you say with a camera, follow it zoomed in over the supposed horizon until the bottom is missing. Then they put the camera down and use a more powerful telescope. Guess what. The full boat comes into view. Hence it is not the horizon that the boat went over.

You have yet to produce a video that stays zoomed in on a boat as it travels over the horizon and shows the bottom of the boat disappearing while the camera is still zoomed in on the boat.
All your videos ever show is zooming in and zooming out. The resolution gets better when you zoom in and the resolution gets worse when you zoom out.
Which has nothing at all to do with my video where the camera stays zoomed in on the boat the whole time and line of site to the bottom of the boat is lost as the boat goes over the horizon.

Stu wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:58 am Let me ask you a quick question.

How far does a boat have to go out, if you're standing on the beach, before it starts going over the horizon, and seemingly the bottom starts disappearing from your view? 5 miles?

RickD wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:15 am Stu,

Having any luck with my questions from post #243?

The way I figured, is that you have 3 possible choices:

1) just outright deny that places exist in Antarctica, even though there’s loads of evidence that these stations exist.

2) admit that using your flat earth map, the scenario I laid out is impossible, and look for another map that works. FYI, there’s no flat earth map that could work.

3) realize that in any flat earth scenario, it there cannot possibly be 24 hours of daylight in both places simultaneously, while having 24 hours of no daylight in parts of Alaska, thereby realizing that flat earth is a lie.

Let me know if you need help working through this.

Stu wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:22 am

RickD wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:15 am Stu,

Having any luck with my questions from post #243?

The way I figured, is that you have 3 possible choices:

1) just outright deny that places exist in Antarctica, even though there’s loads of evidence that these stations exist.

2) admit that using your flat earth map, the scenario I laid out is impossible, and look for another map that works. FYI, there’s no flat earth map that could work.

3) realize that in any flat earth scenario, it there cannot possibly be 24 hours of daylight in both places simultaneously, while having 24 hours of no daylight in parts of Alaska, thereby realizing that flat earth is a lie.

Let me know if you need help working through this.

Yes I have watched the video, just need to put something together.

RickD wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:15 am Stu,

Having any luck with my questions from post #243?

The way I figured, is that you have 3 possible choices:

1) just outright deny that places exist in Antarctica, even though there’s loads of evidence that these stations exist.

2) admit that using your flat earth map, the scenario I laid out is impossible, and look for another map that works. FYI, there’s no flat earth map that could work.

3) realize that in any flat earth scenario, it there cannot possibly be 24 hours of daylight in both places simultaneously, while having 24 hours of no daylight in parts of Alaska, thereby realizing that flat earth is a lie.

Let me know if you need help working through this.

Fliegender wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:21 pm I mean, who can trust someone with a name like Borg Ousland?

We are the Borg. You will be assimilated. resistance is futile.

RickD wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:03 pm Thanks for the context. I thought Fliegender was off his meds again.

RickD wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 5:45 am Stu,

I noticed that you haven’t addressed my post #243 yet. If you have any questions with what I presented, please ask.