Page 20 of 39

Re: The Law

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:26 am
by Gman
Canuckster1127 wrote:The church is not Israel. That is indeed the big if. Israel was chosen by God to bless all nations by being the people God chose to be His covenant people to bless all nations. Israel mat still play a role in eschatology but that role is minor compared to the primary role already fulfilled in Christ.

Portions of the New Testament are written to Jewish believers and deals with these Jewish issues and the difficulty of seeing gentiles coming into Christ without the baggage of the old covenant and ways. When we read passages in the NT, it's important to ask who Paul or the other writers are writing to. That often helps to bring in balance and perspective.

That's my perspective anyway. I'm fine that others disagree and I'm fine with others who believe that the laws they follow worship and please God. You should follow the dictates of tour heart and conscience but don't presume to judge others who choose to live in the freedom of Christ with clear consciences as well.
Thank you Bart. Yes, that is where we may be different.. The NT, I believe, is ambiguous as to exactly what commandments to follow. However I would argue when Christ told us to keep the commandments as in John 14:15, or Paul in Romans 3:31, they were referring back to the OT laws or teachings since we didn't even have the complete Biblical canon until some three hundred years later. And since we do have the NT now, there is really nothing in there that tells us that the OT ways are now void. That is my point..

I'll just copy and paste here my previous response to the Israeli walk.. I believe Christian’s graft into the commonwealth of Israel and are co-citizens of the promises with the Jews Ephesians 2:11-13, 19, Ephesians 3:6, Romans 11:11-24, Galatians 4:28. G-d made the covenants ONLY between the house of Israel and the house of Judah Jeremiah 31:31-32, Hebrews 8:6-13. There is no house of the gentiles.. There are twelve gates on the city of the new Jerusalem Revelation 21:12. There are NO gates for the gentiles only for the tribes of Israel.. Either we graft into the house of Israel or we don't.

Again... I could be wrong about this too. I'm not going to dip this into theological concrete. But it appears that G-d would want us to graft into Biblical Zionism. But this is RISK... I believe there is risk involved in this belief too..

Anyways, I know I can't convince everyone of this.. Like you said this really is a issue of the heart. If it's not in your heart, then I would say not to follow them. I don't want to bash people over the head with this..

Re: The Law

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:39 am
by Gman
RickD wrote:
Gman wrote:
That is what I believe is going on here with obedience... A unity under G-d.. But it comes with a dress code, an eat code, a behavior code, a daily walk code, a worship code... And it's not hard to do however... I don't regret the least for trying.
Ok, this really bothers me G. Please correct me if I'm interpreting what you said wrongly. I thought believers had a "unity" under God because we share a saving faith in Christ. Not because we obey the law. All believers inside or outside all denominations that place their faith in Christ are the body of Christ, the bride of Christ, or the church of Christ. Our union is because of our faith in who Jesus Christ is, and what He did.
Gman, are you really meaning what you said as you said it above? That our unity as believers comes with obedience to an eating code, dress code, behavior code, etc.? Are you really advocating that our unity as the church of Christ is not from our faith in Christ alone, but from our faith in Christ plus our obedience to certain codes?
But we haven't defined what it means to obey... What I'm saying here is that if we believe in Christ, then we would also naturally want to obey Him as well.. I believe that Christ was G-d... I also believe that Christ gave us all the laws whether they were the part of the Mosaic Laws, OT laws, NT laws or wherever.. Christ gave us the laws on Mt Sinai. That is why we follow it as well.. We don't serve a schizophrenic G-d telling us to do one thing, then saying something completely different the next. That is what I believe by unity..

I hope that helps..

Re: The Law

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:51 pm
by KBCid
Canuckster1127 wrote:The law is the flashing warning signal that show us that this path will not bring us joy or success. The expression of our love for God leads to our living in accordance with those universals present in the law but in that context they are not cause .... they are effect. We live in the context of love and the "law" of love and this is why we seek to please God.
I would agree here on the flashing warning signal. The question is if it is a warning and we continue to not change our ways then what is the end result?
The ot law says thou shalt not kill and the new testament law says that if we hate our bretherin without cause then we would also be guilty of the same sin since its based on the intent of loving your neighbor.
So if we are not expected to change our 'ways' and begin to live according to these understandings given by the warning signs then of what purpose are the warnings given?
Can you properly assert that it is ok to keep on hating others while asserting that I believe in God and have faith in Christ? Wouldn't you tell someone that hates others for no reason such as racists that they should turn from doing that 'AND' believe in Christ or would you simply tell them to believe in Christ and they can keep on doing what they want.
I am personally understanding that the message from the bible is that once we learn about what is right and holy that we should strive to live according to those concepts and that we should turn away from those things that are considered sins because that would be our duty to desire to be holy. From my understanding the Holy Spirit will help you to acheive this desire but the desire must be there first. We desire to live in a world to come that will be without sin should we not try of our own accord now to begin to exist that way. Should we not put off the old man with his sinful ways and live according to the holy way God has defined?

Re: The Law

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:47 pm
by Canuckster1127
The confusion comes between what is objective truth based upon what God has accomplished on our behalf in Jesus Christ and what is subjective truth in terms of what we have manifest in our lives.

Salvation is effortless in the sense that God through Faith and Mercy and Grace on our behalf has accomplished all that is required for us.

In terms of our life within society and with others, there is learning and there is effort. It is not transactional with God however in the sense that we are earning salvation. That is why Jesus so often, I believe used hyperbole (a common form of teaching in His day and culture) including the form you reference of hating your brother being the same as murder. He moved the attention from the law or the code for its own sake to that of the heart condition of the person and what motivates them or moves them toward that which is right.

The law serves man. Man doesn't serve the law. Jesus said the same thing in terms of one of the 10 commandments when He said the Sabbath was made for man, man wasn't made for the Sabbath.

Much of the trouble we get ourselves into in this area is that we continually move between that which is objective in God and that which is subjective in us and fail to account for when we're making the shift from one to the other. Scripture addresses both, but it's not always evident or clear in any given passage or context which is being addressed. That's why, I believe, we take the whole counsel of Scripture in this area and we don't treat it as a buffet where we pick and choose what we want to focus upon and what we want to ignore.

Ultimately what God has set in motion now is the law of love, by which He intends for us to live out of who we are in Christ. The law may serve to help us see and understand where we're missing something. It doesn't define us however. That's already resolved before God. We may need laws in the social context to maintain order in society or within a church etc. We may find meaning in ceremony insofar as if provides a means for us to express outwardly what we are experiencing inwardly. All of those are different contexts of law that are important but they do not define our relationship with God through Christ.

Christ said all the law and the prophets hang on two things. Love God with all your heart and love your neighbor as yourself. That speaks to the condition of our heart and the motives for our actions. When we genuine love and care for God and for others, we may need help in places or times understanding what is appropriate and we may need to provide effort on our part to put those things into effect, but they are not "work" because they follow the desire of our hearts. That's the ideal anyway. The reality is often quite messier and that's part of the human experience where we're continually growing subjectively into the objective reality that God tells us is already in place.

Confusing, it is at times. We mix our metaphors, and confuse the objective and subjective quite regularly. At it's heart however, it's much simpler than we try to make it. We're continually tempted to show our own strength and control by attempting to show God, others and ourselves that "we" can do it. God wants us to learn to live in the joy and security of knowing it's already done and we are free to love because of who we are and know we don't have to earn His love. He loves us because of who He is, not because of who we are.

Re: The Law

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:10 pm
by RickD
KBC wrote:
So if we are not expected to change our 'ways' and begin to live according to these understandings given by the warning signs then of what purpose are the warnings given?
KBC, the purpose of the "warnings", or the law, Is to lead us to Christ. The law is there to show us that we can't keep it. Remember, if one is trying to keep the law, and fails at any point, then one is guilty of breaking the entire law. Christ came in the flesh, and followed the law without failing. It is by faith in who Christ is and what he did, we are justified before a God who demands perfection. It is Christ's perfection that saves those who place their faith in him. Not man's futile attempts to come to God through his own works, and attempting to follow the law.
KBC wrote:
I would agree here on the flashing warning signal. The question is if it is a warning and we continue to not change our ways then what is the end result?
KBC, you're still missing the point of Jesus Christ coming in the flesh. We cannot change our ways. Only by faith in Christ, and God indwelling us and His transforming us, does His sanctification transform us. And then just like a good tree produces fruit, the believer produces fruit. Remember, the tree doesn't produce fruit by its own work. It naturally produces fruit. With God transforming a believer, the believer will "naturally" produce good fruit.
KBC wrote:
Can you properly assert that it is ok to keep on hating others while asserting that I believe in God and have faith in Christ?
KBC, if you would place your faith in Christ, you will start to love others more, and love "self" less. That's what sanctification is. Faith in Christ is not changing your life before you come to him. It's God's job to change the believer.
KBC wrote:
Wouldn't you tell someone that hates others for no reason such as racists that they should turn from doing that 'AND' believe in Christ or would you simply tell them to believe in Christ and they can keep on doing what they want.
No and no. I would tell you or anyone else, that you should repent, which means change your mind on who Jesus Christ is and what he has done. Once you have placed your faith in him, then you will start to "want' to love God and your neighbor more, as God transforms you.
KBC wrote:
I am personally understanding that the message from the bible is that once we learn about what is right and holy that we should strive to live according to those concepts and that we should turn away from those things that are considered sins because that would be our duty to desire to be holy.
Then pardon me for being so blunt, but you completely missed the message of the bible, and the Gospel of Jesus Christ. What you are saying, is no different than any man-made religion where one tries to come to God by one's own works. Once we learn what is right and holy, we realize we can never be holy no matter how much we strive to be. We are made holy only through faith in Christ, because he is holy. Put your faith in God. God who came in the flesh to make holy those who place their faith in him. He came to do what the law completely failed to do. If we could change our ways, and follow the law to be holy, then Christ died in vain.
KBC wrote:
We desire to live in a world to come that will be without sin should we not try of our own accord now to begin to exist that way.
Absolutely not! That would be a gospel of our own works.
KBC wrote:
Should we not put off the old man with his sinful ways and live according to the holy way God has defined?
We cannot! Only through faith in Christ does God transform us. He does the transforming, we don't.

Re: The Law

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:32 pm
by RickD
Gman wrote:
RickD wrote:
Gman wrote:
That is what I believe is going on here with obedience... A unity under G-d.. But it comes with a dress code, an eat code, a behavior code, a daily walk code, a worship code... And it's not hard to do however... I don't regret the least for trying.
Ok, this really bothers me G. Please correct me if I'm interpreting what you said wrongly. I thought believers had a "unity" under God because we share a saving faith in Christ. Not because we obey the law. All believers inside or outside all denominations that place their faith in Christ are the body of Christ, the bride of Christ, or the church of Christ. Our union is because of our faith in who Jesus Christ is, and what He did.
Gman, are you really meaning what you said as you said it above? That our unity as believers comes with obedience to an eating code, dress code, behavior code, etc.? Are you really advocating that our unity as the church of Christ is not from our faith in Christ alone, but from our faith in Christ plus our obedience to certain codes?
But we haven't defined what it means to obey... What I'm saying here is that if we believe in Christ, then we would also naturally want to obey Him as well.. I believe that Christ was G-d... I also believe that Christ gave us all the laws whether they were the part of the Mosaic Laws, OT laws, NT laws or wherever.. Christ gave us the laws on Mt Sinai. That is why we follow it as well.. We don't serve a schizophrenic G-d telling us to do one thing, then saying something completely different the next. That is what I believe by unity..

I hope that helps..
G, the problem I see, is your conflating the nation of Israel, and a "spiritual" Israel that is the body of believers in Christ. God gave the 10 Commandments and the OT laws specifically to the physical nation of Israel, not to believers in Christ. If you understand that, it all makes sense.
By saying that if we believe in Christ, we would also naturally want to obey Him, you are saying we naturally want to follow the OT Sabbath laws, and follow OT ceremonies and festivals. As God transforms me, I "naturally" want to love Him and my neighbor more. I don't naturally want to follow OT ceremonial laws. Those laws, including Sabbath laws, have been fulfilled in Jesus Christ. All those Sabbaths, festivals, ceremonies, etc. all pointed to Christ. Now that Christ came, they did what they were supposed to do.
A believers walk is a walk of faith in Christ and what he has done. Our walk is not a walk of trying to follow OT food, clothing, ceremonial laws and codes. The focus of a believer should be on who Jesus Christ is and what he has done. Not on what we try to do to be approved by God. We get no special blessings from God because of what codes and laws we try to follow. Our blessing from God comes only because of God's grace, and through the person and work of Jesus Christ.

Re: The Law

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:52 pm
by Gman
RickD wrote: G, the problem I see, is your conflating the nation of Israel, and a "spiritual" Israel that is the body of believers in Christ. God gave the 10 Commandments and the OT laws specifically to the physical nation of Israel, not to believers in Christ. If you understand that, it all makes sense.
Unfortunately I believe your claims are false... I'm not conflating the two. Scripture is very very very clear that Christian’s graft into the commonwealth of Israel and are co-citizens of the promises with the Jews Ephesians 2:11-13, 19, Ephesians 3:6, Romans 11:11-24, Galatians 4:28. It's really that simple.. We DO NOT graft into some weird mystical church..

We HAVE to have laws... We NEED laws.... Laws are not bad.. They are freedom. Taking a day off of work is good.. Eating toxic pork is bad... Unfortunately I don't know how to get this message across. Can you imagine a world without laws? It is so clear to me now...
RickD wrote:By saying that if we believe in Christ, we would also naturally want to obey Him, you are saying we naturally want to follow the OT Sabbath laws, and follow OT ceremonies and festivals. As God transforms me, I "naturally" want to love Him and my neighbor more. I don't naturally want to follow OT ceremonial laws. Those laws, including Sabbath laws, have been fulfilled in Jesus Christ. All those Sabbaths, festivals, ceremonies, etc. all pointed to Christ. Now that Christ came, they did what they were supposed to do.
Having Yeshua fulfill the Torah does not mean that G-d's laws are now void... A been there done that attitude... The Biblical festivals are FREEDOM... They are FUN.... We just want to practice them in love.
RickD wrote:A believers walk is a walk of faith in Christ and what he has done. Our walk is not a walk of trying to follow OT food, clothing, ceremonial laws and codes. The focus of a believer should be on who Jesus Christ is and what he has done. Not on what we try to do to be approved by God. We get no special blessings from God because of what codes and laws we try to follow. Our blessing from God comes only because of God's grace, and through the person and work of Jesus Christ.
We obey Christ's commandments because we LOVE him... We are not robots.. We are not looking for some special approval. Do you want to live in sin?

We just dance to the beat of a different drum amigo... We are just different people and see things completely different... That's just the way it is.. There really is no sense on going on with this discussion..

Re: The Law

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:51 pm
by RickD
Gman wrote:
Unfortunately I believe your claims are false... I'm not conflating the two. Scripture is very very very clear that Christian’s graft into the commonwealth of Israel and are co-citizens of the promises with the Jews Ephesians 2:11-13, 19, Ephesians 3:6, Romans 11:11-24, Galatians 4:28. It's really that simple.. We DO NOT graft into some weird mystical church..
G, your belief that gentile believers are grafted into the nation of Israel is what is leading you to interpret these verses as you do. For example in your quote of Ephesians 2, you left out an important verse. Verse 15. Look at in context:
Ephesians 2:11-19
11 Therefore remember that aformerly byou, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called “cUncircumcision” by the so-called “cCircumcision,” which is performed in the flesh by human hands—

12 remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, 1aexcluded from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to bthe covenants of promise, having cno hope and dwithout God in the world.

13 But now in aChrist Jesus you who bformerly were cfar off 1have cbeen brought near 2dby the blood of Christ.

14 For He Himself is aour peace, bwho made both groups into one and broke down the 1barrier of the dividing wall,

15 1by aabolishing in His flesh the enmity, which is bthe Law of commandments contained in ordinances, so that in Himself He might 2cmake the two into done new man, thus establishing epeace,

16 and might areconcile them both in bone body to God through the cross, 1by it having cput to death the enmity.

17 And aHe came and preached bpeace to you who were cfar away, and peace to those who were cnear;

18 for through Him we both have aour access in bone Spirit to cthe Father.

19 So then you are no longer astrangers and aliens, but you are bfellow citizens with the 1saints, and are of cGod’s household,
Those verses don't say that gentile believers were grafted into Israel. They simply say that Jewish and Gentile believers are reconciled to God through the cross. Notice in verse 15, that Christ abolished in his flesh, the Law of commandments so that in Christ Himself, Jews and Gentiles are one body. The Law of commandments is called an enmity here.

Ephesians 3:6
6 to be specific, that the Gentiles are afellow heirs and bfellow members of the body, and cfellow partakers of the promise in dChrist Jesus through the gospel,
This also doesn't say that gentile believers are now part of the nation of Israel. It simply says that Gentiles are one with Jews through the promise in Christ Jesus.

Romans 11:11-24

Romans 11:11–24

11 aI say then, they did not stumble so as to fall, did they? bMay it never be! But by their transgression csalvation has come to the Gentiles, to dmake them jealous.

12 Now if their transgression is riches for the world and their failure is riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their 1afulfillment be!

13 But I am speaking to you who are Gentiles. Inasmuch then as aI am an apostle of Gentiles, I magnify my ministry,

14 if somehow I might amove to jealousy bmy 1fellow countrymen and csave some of them.

15 For if their rejection is the areconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but blife from the dead?

16 If the afirst piece of dough is holy, the lump is also; and if the root is holy, the branches are too.

17 But if some of the abranches were broken off, and byou, being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became partaker with them of the 1rich root of the olive tree,

18 do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that ait is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you.

19 aYou will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.”

20 Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you astand by your faith. bDo not be conceited, but fear;

21 for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either.

22 Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s akindness, bif you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also cwill be cut off.

23 And they also, aif they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again.

24 For if you were cut off from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and were grafted contrary to nature into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these who are the natural branches be grafted into their own olive tree?
Natural olive branches are Israel. Wild olive branches are Gentiles. The branches are of the "rich root of the olive tree", which is Christ. Through faith, Jews and Gentiles are in the same tree which is Jesus Christ. The tree is not Israel here. Gentiles are not grafted into Israel. Both Israel and Gentiles are branches of the same tree.
We HAVE to have laws... We NEED laws.... Laws are not bad.. They are freedom. Taking a day off of work is good.. Eating toxic pork is bad... Unfortunately I don't know how to get this message across. Can you imagine a world without laws? It is so clear to me now...
G, this argument is not relevant. I never said don't take a day off from work. Toxic anything is bad. Pork cooked to the proper temperature is as healthy as other meats. How many cases of Trichinosis by toxic pork happen in the U. S. when the pork is cooked properly? Chicken and turkey that's not cooked properly causes problems too.
Having Yeshua fulfill the Torah does not mean that G-d's laws are now void... A been there done that attitude... The Biblical festivals are FREEDOM... They are FUN.... We just want to practice them in love
Again, that's fine if you want to follow them. But saying it's a sin if a believer doesn't follow them, or saying it's a sin if a believer eats pork, when a gentile believer is NEVER prohibited in eating pork, is just flat out legalism, however you try to disguise it.
We obey Christ's commandments because we LOVE him...
Which commandments of Christ are you talking about. Christ certainly never commanded you as a gentile to obey the Jewish Sabbath. Where did Christ command you to not eat certain foods? Show me where in the New Testament did Jesus Christ command Gentile believers not to eat certain foods. Some of these commands weren't meant for you to follow.
Gman wrote:
There really is no sense on going on with this discussion..
G, there is sense to discuss this. We have forum members here that believe in a different Christ, and a different gospel. They look up to you and follow what you say. They don't understand the gospel, but they understand the religion of works and following laws.

Re: The Law

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:01 am
by KBCid
KBCid wrote:So if we are not expected to change our 'ways' and begin to live according to these understandings given by the warning signs then of what purpose are the warnings given?
RickD wrote:KBC, the purpose of the "warnings", or the law, Is to lead us to Christ. The law is there to show us that we can't keep it. Remember, if one is trying to keep the law, and fails at any point, then one is guilty of breaking the entire law. Christ came in the flesh, and followed the law without failing. It is by faith in who Christ is and what he did, we are justified before a God who demands perfection. It is Christ's perfection that saves those who place their faith in him. Not man's futile attempts to come to God through his own works, and attempting to follow the law.
Here we go with the works for salvation thing again. You still don't get my position even after the multitude of times I have directly addressed your acusations.

I know I have repeatedly stated that we cannot by automated process force the giving of the gift of eternal life by works. Why you keep pushing my position into that vein is beyond me. So for the millionth time KBCid says ephatically and without reserve that "no one can acheive eternal life without God gifting it to them". We cannot force God to give us life because of doing what is right. Doing what is right is our minimal duty.
Consider Adam and Eve... they were made in a sinless condition and continued in that state until they sinned. God gave them free choice to either obey his warnings about the fruit or not to. God left their choice up to them, he didn't cause them to choose a certain way but by their actions Adam and Eve caused a separation between themselves and God at the point that they stopped obeying his commandment. Their willful act of disobedience is what began this entire saga of sin separating man from God.
So it should be completely understood that our actions don't grant us godlike power to gain eternal life buuuut, our actions can separate us from God. If you willfully choose to kill others and don't turn from continuing that action then you can be certain that you will not gain eternal life. As far as I know from scripture there will be no muderers, liars etc. in heaven;

Eph 5:5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.

Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

So if by your own free will you choose to keep on doing any of the things noted above then your works will definitely get you something.... just not eternal life. You will effectively separate yourself from God just as Adam and Eve did. Without free choice we cannot give God true love and this is what he wants. If you think God will come in and change a man to do his will against the mans free choice then God would not be getting true love and you would be wrong.
This is exactly why we are commanded to change and not just simply believe. Anyone can believe that Christ is the only way to heaven but without an internal desire to love God for his ways and be like him you will recieve nothing but an end of existence.
This understanding is stated in nearly the same way in both the old and new testaments.

OT references;
2Ch 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

Eze 3:20 Again, When a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

Eze 33:8 When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
Eze 33:9 Nevertheless, if thou warn the wicked of his way to turn from it; if he do not turn from his way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.
Eze 33:10 Therefore, O thou son of man, speak unto the house of Israel; Thus ye speak, saying, If our transgressions and our sins be upon us, and we pine away in them, how should we then live?
Eze 33:11 Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
Eze 33:12 Therefore, thou son of man, say unto the children of thy people, The righteousness of the righteous shall not deliver him in the day of his transgression: as for the wickedness of the wicked, he shall not fall thereby in the day that he turneth from his wickedness; neither shall the righteous be able to live for his righteousness in the day that he sinneth.
Eze 33:13 When I shall say to the righteous, that he shall surely live; if he trust to his own righteousness, and commit iniquity, all his righteousnesses shall not be remembered; but for his iniquity that he hath committed, he shall die for it.
Eze 33:14 Again, when I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; if he turn from his sin, and do that which is lawful and right;
Eze 33:15 If the wicked restore the pledge, give again that he had robbed, walk in the statutes of life, without committing iniquity; he shall surely live, he shall not die.
Eze 33:16 None of his sins that he hath committed shall be mentioned unto him: he hath done that which is lawful and right; he shall surely live.
Eze 33:17 Yet the children of thy people say, The way of the Lord is not equal: but as for them, their way is not equal.
Eze 33:18 When the righteous turneth from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, he shall even die thereby.
Eze 33:19 But if the wicked turn from his wickedness, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall live thereby.

NT references;
Joh 5:14 Afterward Jesus findeth him in the temple, and said unto him, Behold, thou art made whole: sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee.
Joh 8:11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.
Joh 8:34 Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.
Rom 6:1 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
Rom 6:2 God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
Rom 6:12 Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.
Rom 6:13 Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.
Rom 6:15 What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.
Rom 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Rom 6:17 But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.
Rom 6:18 Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.
Rom 6:19 I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh: for as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.
Rom 6:20 For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness.
Rom 6:21 What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? for the end of those things is death.
1Co 6:18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
1Co 8:12 But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ.
1Co 15:34 Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of God: I speak this to your shame.
Gal 2:17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid.
Eph 4:26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath
1Ti 5:20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
Heb 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins
Jas 4:17 Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.

Notice those last two verses.... If we sin 'WILLFULLY', If you 'KNOWINGLY" sin after you have knowledge of the truth then there is no more sacrifice for sin. You must choose to turn from sinning, you must by your own free will turn from doing evil or you will lose the only accepted sacrifice for sin ever given. So ultimately you can perform works which definitely separate you from God but you can't perform works that automatically give you the gift of eternal life.
Do you get my position now? Do you understand that I am not promoting salvation by works? Do you also now understand that I am asserting that you can lose the possibility of salvation by willfully choosing to sin?
The bible has brought me to understand that if I choose of my own free will to desire to live with God forever that God will give me help to make it happen and he will ensure that I am not tempted to sin beyond my ability to freely choose not to sin. The holy spirit is the indwelling helper I am given to direct my path when I am unsure of what is proper and holy, the holy spirit is not a controller of mind and body forcing you against your free choice to do Gods will.

Re: The Law

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 3:10 am
by KBCid
Gman wrote:We HAVE to have laws... We NEED laws.... Laws are not bad.. They are freedom. Taking a day off of work is good.. Eating toxic pork is bad... Unfortunately I don't know how to get this message across. Can you imagine a world without laws? It is so clear to me now...
you know G there was a time when I was young that I got caught breaking a law by a police officer. This guy was actually a really decent person and he worked at convincing me that breaking the laws was not the way I should go through life and he made a statement that seems to hold a huge amount of truth for this thread at this time;

"Laws are in place for law breakers not for law abiding citizens and payment for breaking the law is a method to convince the lawbreaker to cease breaking the law" (I was bad and had to pay a fine)

Gods laws dealing with principles of conduct were put in place to show the law breakers that they were in fact not law abiding and make it clear to them that the actions they were performing were sinful. Now once those laws were in place then no one who continued to break the laws would have an excuse to say well i didn't know it was a sin so it not my fault.
Gods laws are / were not just a random assortment of arbitrary rules given just to see how many people would fail at performing them, they were his perspective on what is unholy conduct and since he is holy and just then he can absolutely define that which is not and specify it in words which he did. However, along with those principle laws he also commanded a temporary system to deal with the payment for breaking the laws and somehow it has come down through time into the minds of many that when the temporary commands were done away with then this also eliminated the need to "try and follow" the principles that required the temporary payment laws in the first place.
It is disheartening to say the least that when I speak about making a positive choice to live according Gods principles of conduct that it always becomes an argument for salvation by works when in fact it is our duty to do our best to live a holy existence without expecting to be repaid for it. If we are created in the image of God then we should do our best to reflect him in everything we do from thinking to acting and if we freely choose not to reflect his image then we will one day cease to exist since there is no power other than his to keep us in existence. This would be the principle of "why keep haters around" ;)

Re: The Law

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 8:44 am
by RickD
Kbc wrote:
Here we go with the works for salvation thing again. You still don't get my position even after the multitude of times I have directly addressed your acusations.

and

So ultimately you can perform works which definitely separate you from God but you can't perform works that automatically give you the gift of eternal life.

and

So it should be completely understood that our actions don't grant us godlike power to gain eternal life buuuut, our actions can separate us from God.
KBC, now you are advocating sanctification by works. Or losing salvation by works. If a believer sins, in your mind, he can be separated from God, and lose his salvation. Am I misrepresenting what you're saying here? IMO, one who believes he can lose his salvation, will "strive" in the flesh, to keep his salvation. Are you seeing anything yet?

1 Corinthians 6:9-11: 9Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. 11Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.

KBC, once one believes in Christ, he is a new creature. He is now justified before God by Jesus Christ. God does not judge the believer on his fleshly nature. He sees the new spiritual nature, which is being made perfect in Christ. The fleshly(sinful) nature from which comes fornication, idolatry, adultery, etc. WILL NOT inherit the kingdom of God.
KBC wrote:
So if by your own free will you choose to keep on doing any of the things noted above then your works will definitely get you something.... just not eternal life.
You are advocating sanctification by works again. As long as a believer is in this sinful body, he will be constantly at war with his new spiritual nature. Until this body is gone, a believer will not stop sinning. As a believer is sanctified over time, his desire to sin will become less.
Without free choice we cannot give God true love and this is what he wants. If you think God will come in and change a man to do his will against the mans free choice then God would not be getting true love and you would be wrong.
You're close here. "Free choice" does not give us the power to give God true love. That only comes by God's sanctification. I'm not saying that once one is a believer, then the Holy Spirit comes in and takes over, making the believer a robot, and kicking out the believer's free will.
Anyone can believe that Christ is the only way to heaven but without an internal desire to love God for his ways and be like him you will recieve nothing but an end of existence.
And where does this "internal desire to love God" come from? Not the old sinful nature.
Do you get my position now? Do you understand that I am not promoting salvation by works? Do you also now understand that I am asserting that you can lose the possibility of salvation by willfully choosing to sin?
Yes, it sounds more like sanctification by works. Or losing salvation by bad works, or lack of works. How is this not salvation or sanctification by works if you're saying a believer can lose salvation by willfully choosing to sin? It's keeping salvation by works. And it seems you believe that if a believer chooses to sin in his sinful nature(the flesh), then he can lose his salvation. The problem with that is a believer's sinful nature will be at war with his spiritual nature. The book of Romans does a great job of describing how a believer is a "walking civil war". With the sinful nature constantly fighting with the new spiritual nature in Christ.
KBC wrote:
The holy spirit is the indwelling helper I am given to direct my path when I am unsure of what is proper and holy, the holy spirit is not a controller of mind and body forcing you against your free choice to do Gods will.
KBC, the Holy Spirit is given to one who puts his faith in Christ. Not just any Christ. Until you understand who Jesus Christ is, the true Jesus Christ who is truly God, then you are not saved. And you cannot understand the civil war between the sinful nature and the new spiritual nature. That is why you still feel like you need to "strive" to change. All you can understand is striving in the flesh because you don't have the new nature. Until you repent and change your mind about who Jesus Christ really is, and what He has done, and place your faith in Him, you cannot begin to understand.

Re: The Law

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:21 pm
by KBCid
Kbcid wrote:Here we go with the works for salvation thing again. You still don't get my position even after the multitude of times I have directly addressed your acusations.
and
So ultimately you can perform works which definitely separate you from God but you can't perform works that automatically give you the gift of eternal life.
and
So it should be completely understood that our actions don't grant us godlike power to gain eternal life buuuut, our actions can separate us from God.
Rickd wrote:KBC, now you are advocating sanctification by works.
Seriously..... all that text in english even and this is your reply.
Rickd wrote:Or losing salvation by works. If a believer sins, in your mind, he can be separated from God, and lose his salvation. Am I misrepresenting what you're saying here?
......
Rickd wrote:IMO, one who believes he can lose his salvation, will "strive" in the flesh, to keep his salvation. Are you seeing anything yet?.
Yes i see that you have an opinion.
We are spirits housed in flesh. What God wants comes from the spirit that controls the flesh. The flesh will always have a sinful nature because it has different goals than the spirit. Your spirit was given the freedom of choice, you can follow after the desires of your flesh or you can choose to desire God and his ways. Whichever way you choose is whose servant you are, if you choose the flesh then you are the servant of sin if it is God then you are the servant of God but you cannot serve both and I gave a plethora of verses to back that position.
Rickd wrote:KBC, once one believes in Christ, he is a new creature. He is now justified before God by Jesus Christ. God does not judge the believer on his fleshly nature. He sees the new spiritual nature, which is being made perfect in Christ. The fleshly(sinful) nature from which comes fornication, idolatry, adultery, etc. WILL NOT inherit the kingdom of God.
Thus, your position is that a murder once he believes becomes a new creature and his flesh can continue murdering because thats just his fleshly body doing its normal thing of sinning and it is fine that he keeps on murdering after he believes. Essentially everyones flesh has a license to sin all the way to the end. Do you see why I don't agree with your opinion yet?
Kbcid wrote:So if by your own free will you choose to keep on doing any of the things noted above then your works will definitely get you something.... just not eternal life.
Rickd wrote:You are advocating sanctification by works again.
No. your opinion is thats what i'm saying.
Rom 12:1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.

doing the right thing is our reasonable service to our maker. If you want to only see that service as sanctification by works then that is obsolutely your choice to make. Continuing to assert that it is what I am saying however is a misrepresentation of my position.
Rickd wrote:As long as a believer is in this sinful body, he will be constantly at war with his new spiritual nature. Until this body is gone, a believer will not stop sinning. As a believer is sanctified over time, his desire to sin will become less.
This message was brought to Christians by the power of God through his word;
Rom 11:21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
Rom 11:22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.

Of what need does one have to take heed if he has no part in the process past the believing point? The entirety of this message was a waste of time because if you are right then those christians no longer had to heed anything since they already believed. So this message was another one of those sanctification by works messages by the biblical writer that seems to be interspersed throughout the NT.
Kbcid wrote:Without free choice we cannot give God true love and this is what he wants. If you think God will come in and change a man to do his will against the mans free choice then God would not be getting true love and you would be wrong.
Rickd wrote:You're close here. "Free choice" does not give us the power to give God true love. That only comes by God's sanctification. I'm not saying that once one is a believer, then the Holy Spirit comes in and takes over, making the believer a robot, and kicking out the believer's free will.
Hos 14:2 Take with you words, and turn to the LORD: say unto him, Take away all iniquity, and receive us graciously: so will we render the calves of our lips.
Hos 14:9 Who is wise, and he shall understand these things? prudent, and he shall know them? for the ways of the LORD are right, and the just shall walk in them: but the transgressors shall fall therein.
Heb 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins

Dear Chuck,
Thank you very much for your reply. I still acknowledge God as my Heavenly Father, Lord and Savior, though I am indulging in lesbianism now. Everyday, I have to say "sorry" to Father in heaven and I still see Him bless me in certain ways, though I strongly believe that I am not getting the best deals since I am sinning.
"Can I continue my act of lesbianism and still get into Heaven but just as one "escaping from fire?..."

Chuck's Response:
You're on pretty shaky ground when you know what God wants you to do but disobey anyway. Here's what it says in Romans 6.
"Well then shall we keep on sinning so that God can keep on showing us more and more kindness and forgiveness? Of course not. Should we keep on sinning when we don't have to?
My guess is that one of two things has happened. Either you have accepted God as your Heavenly Father, Lord and Savior in your head but not in your heart, or you are comfortable shaking your fist at Him and telling Him to go jump because you are going to do things your way. Sorry to be harsh but I have to be honest. You can decide what you want to do.
....Sure we make mistakes, but habitual sin of some sort is a sign that we really don't know God....
http://www.chucksnyder.org/askchuck/0054.htm
Kbcid wrote: Anyone can believe that Christ is the only way to heaven but without an internal desire to love God for his ways and be like him you will recieve nothing but an end of existence.
Rickd wrote:And where does this "internal desire to love God" come from? Not the old sinful nature.
It comes from the spirit residing in the sinfull body... You, me, joe, mary, etc. It is the free choice we have to make. If it is not our free choice then we are just a robot. Gods word comes to sinners who are in the state of sinfulness and they at that time have the ability to choose a different state, Gods state, to become holy, but it begins with a free choice and you will be able to attain that free choice with Gods help as long as you continue to follow his ways by your free choice. When you turn again to to do the same sins from which you came then your choice has changed from loving God with all your heart to loving sin more than the creator.
Kbcid wrote:Do you get my position now? Do you understand that I am not promoting salvation by works? Do you also now understand that I am asserting that you can lose the possibility of salvation by willfully choosing to sin?
Rickd wrote:Yes, it sounds more like sanctification by works. Or losing salvation by bad works, or lack of works. How is this not salvation or sanctification by works if you're saying a believer can lose salvation by willfully choosing to sin?

Because willfull sinning takes away sanctification.

Sanctification
the state of growing in divine grace as a result of Christian commitment after baptism or conversion
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictiona ... tification

Beliefs about sanctification vary amongst the Christian denominations and movement, influenced by various Christian movements. These beliefs differ from each other on: whether sanctification is a definitive experience or process, when the process/experience takes place, and if entire sanctification is possible in this life.
Influenced by the Holiness movement some Pentecostal churches, such as the Church of God in Christ and the Apostolic Faith Church, believe that sanctification is a definitive act of God’s grace and spiritual experience whereby we are made holy subsequent to salvation and prior to the baptism of the Holy Spirit.[11][12][13] Reformed Churches are amongst denominations that teach about definitive sanctification at the time of conversion, and believers are required to "do good works" which are "… all sanctified by (God’s) grace."[14] Similarly, non-Wesleysan Pentecostals such as Assemblies of God teach about definitive sanctification at the time of conversion and progressive sanctification after conversion. Converted believers are expected to "make every effort to live a holy life…

As I stated quite a while ago there are many sects with specific beliefs and not all of them can be correct. You are delivering your message according to your sects specific beliefs. How do I know that your message is the only correct one out there? Can you garrantee me that all I have to do is believe in Christ and I can keep on willfully sinning and still be saved?

Re: The Law

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:51 pm
by RickD
KBC, I'm sorry that I can't properly explain what I mean. God's grace is not a license to sin.
KBC wrote:
As I stated quite a while ago there are many sects with specific beliefs and not all of them can be correct. You are delivering your message according to your sects specific beliefs. How do I know that your message is the only correct one out there? Can you garrantee me that all I have to do is believe in Christ and I can keep on willfully sinning and still be saved?
KBC, I don't belong to a sect. Whatever that is. Scripture is clear to me that

1) once one puts his faith in Christ for salvation, one is assured of salvation because of God's promises.

2) if one is saved by trusting in Christ, then one won't continue in willful sin. There may well be times in a believers life that he struggles with sin. God will chastise a believer and through the HS, convict a believed of his sin. A believer can resist the HS, and give in to the flesh as you have said. That believer will probably be miserable in the mean time. God will continue to convict, and draw back the believer to Him. The believer will not lose his salvation however. God begins the work of salvation, and He continues the work of sanctification throughout a believer's life. You can believe this or not. I've tried and failed to get you to understand this. Perhaps someone else will be able to get through to you.

Re: The Law

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:17 pm
by KBCid
RickD wrote:KBC, I'm sorry that I can't properly explain what I mean. God's grace is not a license to sin.
I am not trying to make you sorry nor am I trying to say your wrong. It is not my position to judge others. In order for us to have a conversation of value then we need both understand each others position correctly. I am testing my understanding which came and comes from a direct reading of scripture untainted by the plethora of exisiting faiths who all assert a belief in both God and Christ.
So if you don't mean that we have a license to sin then we should as I assert turn from sinning. This is an either or thing here. Either we can willingly keep sinning or we willingly turn away from sinning. You have to definitively choose what your intended meaning is. I am patient and you seem very persistent in trying to convey some meaning to me so I will always do my best to give you all the leeway you need to be clarified and not misrepresented.
This is my weak and sinfull attempt to be holy like my maker which is my current understanding of how I should love my bretherin. Is God guiding my actions without my knowing it because I believe in Christ... that may be so but I don't feel as though I have let go of the wheel on this chunk of flesh I exist within.
KBCid wrote:As I stated quite a while ago there are many sects with specific beliefs and not all of them can be correct. You are delivering your message according to your sects specific beliefs. How do I know that your message is the only correct one out there? Can you garrantee me that all I have to do is believe in Christ and I can keep on willfully sinning and still be saved?
RickD wrote:KBC, I don't belong to a sect. Whatever that is.


Then let me clarify. A sect has minimally one of two possible distinctions;

Sect
1a : a dissenting or schismatic religious body; especially : one regarded as extreme or heretical b : a religious denomination
3a : a group adhering to a distinctive doctrine or to a leader
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sect

In the first definition a dissenting religious body would be any of the 'protest-ant' faiths who dissented from an original faith or a religious denomination. In the second or more generally used definition you would be part of a group with a distinctive doctrine. My use of sect actually includes both of these definitions. Since you obviously have a distinctive doctrine then you would likely be part of a group or denomination that also holds this same distinctive doctrine. With this being clarified you can inform me whether this correctly represents you or not.
RickD wrote:Scripture is clear to me that; 1) once one puts his faith in Christ for salvation, one is assured of salvation because of God's promises.
So here you are saying that if I perform a specific action then I am assured of salvation. Correct?
RickD wrote:2) if one is saved by trusting in Christ, then one won't continue in willful sin.
Here you are absolutely agreeing with everything I have previously stated and yet are still arguing against. If you believe in Christ then you will turn from sin. you can either continue to sin willfully or you can choose by your free will to turn from sinning. You cannot have it both ways so please choose and stick with a specific doctrine that you wish to convey so that I can understand what you mean.
RickD wrote:There may well be times in a believers life that he struggles with sin.

A believer cannot struggle with sin if God is doing the driving. A believer can only struggle with sin if he is actively resisting sin which is the sanctification by actions which you have already stated emphatically is wrong.
RickD wrote:God will chastise a believer and through the HS, convict a believer of his sin. A believer can resist the HS, and give in to the flesh as you have said. That believer will probably be miserable in the mean time. God will continue to convict, and draw back the believer to Him. The believer will not lose his salvation however. God begins the work of salvation, and He continues the work of sanctification throughout a believer's life. You can believe this or not. I've tried and failed to get you to understand this. Perhaps someone else will be able to get through to you.
Why would God chastise the believer? What would the believer be chastised about? haven't you already made the case that no amount of effort on our part will have any effect on salvation? Effectively you assert that God will chastise a believer during the process and whether the believer willfully follows or willfully refuses to follow he will be saved regardless of outcome. Thus, your doctrine is that God will spank us for being bad along the way knowing already that we were / are incapable of not being good to begin with and regardless of whether we willfully agree with his correction or willfully disagree with it we will be saved. Does this sound like a proper representation of your position?

I would at this point like to restate my purpose in this thread so that you can see exactly what I am after as this may have some effect on how you reply to me. I have been given an understanding of scripture entirely from my own personal reading of scripture and I have accepted that Christ is the only way to eternal life. With this understanding I am testing foundational specifics of it against other Christian faiths / sects to see if I have somehow made an error in understanding because I am after all just a man. In order to test my understandings I must of course present them and then my hope is that using scripture as a foundation you can correct what you feel is an error on my part. Simply saying I am wrong holds no power of conviction for me. Specifically showing a scriptural reference along with the defining of the rationale used for your interpretation is what I seek.
I have no desire to prove to anyone that you are wrong even if in the greater scheme of things you may be. I don't possess the Godly understanding to judge your position. I can merely choose to agree with you and adapt my way to more closely resemble your own or I can assert that your understanding doesn't fit with mine in which case we would be done with profitable interactions on the subject at hand.

Re: The Law

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:42 pm
by Gman
RickD wrote: G, your belief that gentile believers are grafted into the nation of Israel is what is leading you to interpret these verses as you do. For example in your quote of Ephesians 2, you left out an important verse. Verse 15. Look at in context:
No.. The barrier or enmity is not the Torah or laws.. According to scripture G-d's laws are holy Romans 7:12.. What Paul seems to be saying is abolishing of the barrier between Jew and Gentile. The fleshy law of legalistic rabbinical rules and regulations (the Law of commandments contained in ordinances - Like the Oral laws or Talmud).. Not the Mosaic law itself.
RickD wrote:Ephesians 2:11-19
11 Therefore remember that aformerly byou, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called “cUncircumcision” by the so-called “cCircumcision,” which is performed in the flesh by human hands—

12 remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, 1aexcluded from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to bthe covenants of promise, having cno hope and dwithout God in the world.

13 But now in aChrist Jesus you who bformerly were cfar off 1have cbeen brought near 2dby the blood of Christ.

14 For He Himself is aour peace, bwho made both groups into one and broke down the 1barrier of the dividing wall,

15 1by aabolishing in His flesh the enmity, which is bthe Law of commandments contained in ordinances, so that in Himself He might 2cmake the two into done new man, thus establishing epeace,

16 and might areconcile them both in bone body to God through the cross, 1by it having cput to death the enmity.

17 And aHe came and preached bpeace to you who were cfar away, and peace to those who were cnear;

18 for through Him we both have aour access in bone Spirit to cthe Father.

19 So then you are no longer astrangers and aliens, but you are bfellow citizens with the 1saints, and are of cGod’s household,
Those verses don't say that gentile believers were grafted into Israel.
No... I can assure you that gentiles graft into the commonwealth Israel... Not into some pig poo eating stinky church. ;)

Look at Ephesians 2:12-13, 19 again...

Ephesians 2:12-13 remember that at that time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world. 13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ.

Ephesians 2:19 Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people and also members of his household,

Look at Strong's G2474 for Israēl

http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lex ... ongs=G2474
RickD wrote:They simply say that Jewish and Gentile believers are reconciled to God through the cross. Notice in verse 15, that Christ abolished in his flesh, the Law of commandments so that in Christ Himself, Jews and Gentiles are one body. The Law of commandments is called an enmity here.
No it DOES NOT.... G-d's laws are NOT enmity. G-d's laws are not evil.... They are not stumbling blocks...

If G-d's laws are stumbling blocks or enmity, He is going to write those things into the Jews and Gentiles hearts and minds.... You don't see how dumb that sounds?

Hebrews 10:16 “This is the covenant I will make with them after that time, says the Lord. I will put my laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds.”
RickD wrote:Ephesians 3:6
6 to be specific, that the Gentiles are afellow heirs and bfellow members of the body, and cfellow partakers of the promise in dChrist Jesus through the gospel,
This also doesn't say that gentile believers are now part of the nation of Israel. It simply says that Gentiles are one with Jews through the promise in Christ Jesus.
No... Read it in the NIV. It means joint heirs to the nation of Israel or commonwealth.

Ephesians 3:6 This mystery is that through the gospel the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus.
RickD wrote:Natural olive branches are Israel. Wild olive branches are Gentiles. The branches are of the "rich root of the olive tree", which is Christ. Through faith, Jews and Gentiles are in the same tree which is Jesus Christ. The tree is not Israel here. Gentiles are not grafted into Israel. Both Israel and Gentiles are branches of the same tree.
No the olive tree refers to the spiritual Commonwealth of Israel..It is similar to the British Commonwealth. And Israel is part of Christ. Don't forget that Christ will set His feet upon the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem as the Kingly Messiah - Zechariah 14:4, Acts 1:11-12. He is not coming to redeem Las Vegas.. He is coming to redeem the nations THROUGH Israel His earthly throne for the millennium.

Also in Jer 11:16-17 and Psalms 128:3, The people of Israel is called a “green olive tree”
RickD wrote:G, this argument is not relevant. I never said don't take a day off from work. Toxic anything is bad. Pork cooked to the proper temperature is as healthy as other meats. How many cases of Trichinosis by toxic pork happen in the U. S. when the pork is cooked properly? Chicken and turkey that's not cooked properly causes problems too.
Pigs are omnivores and will eat anything, including other pigs. ... It's good that G-d told us not to eat them.
RickD wrote:Again, that's fine if you want to follow them. But saying it's a sin if a believer doesn't follow them, or saying it's a sin if a believer eats pork, when a gentile believer is NEVER prohibited in eating pork, is just flat out legalism, however you try to disguise it.
Again.. I'm not saying that you will loose your salvation for eating pig... But your life may be shortened.. Regardless, we follow G-d laws because we WANT to willingly submit to Him. Not to earn points... Not for salvation... Out of respect for His ways.
RickD wrote:Which commandments of Christ are you talking about. Christ certainly never commanded you as a gentile to obey the Jewish Sabbath. Where did Christ command you to not eat certain foods? Show me where in the New Testament did Jesus Christ command Gentile believers not to eat certain foods. Some of these commands weren't meant for you to follow.
Christ told us to keep the commandments as in John 14:15, or Paul in Romans 3:31, they were referring back to the OT laws or teachings since we didn't even have the complete Biblical canon until some three hundred years later. And since we do have the NT now, there is really nothing in there that tells us that the OT ways are now void. That is my point..
RickD wrote:G, there is sense to discuss this. We have forum members here that believe in a different Christ, and a different gospel. They look up to you and follow what you say. They don't understand the gospel, but they understand the religion of works and following laws.
We don't need to follow G-d's laws anymore?

Do you teach against homosexuality? Then you are teaching and fulfilling the Mosaic law of Lev 18:22..
Do you help the poor? Then you are teaching and fulfilling the Mosaic law of Deuteronomy 15:7.
Do you Tithe? Then you are teaching and fulfilling the Mosaic law of Deuteronomy 14:22
Do you not rob others? Then you are teaching and fulfilling the Mosaic law of Lev 19:13