Since when did I start attacking you?
There is empirical evidence-Bible. Yes, it is a good source, it was written through the Holy Spirit by man.
For the Ark, do you know how large that thing is/was (depending on if that is the Ark stuck in a mountain in eastern Turkey...several eyewitnesses have seen it, and haven't contradicted themselves).
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebo ... #wp1031468
The Ark is frequently depicted as a small boat by those who have not bothered to check its dimensions. It was 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits tall. While there were several ancient cubits (generally the distance from a man's elbow to the extended fingers), a cubit was typically 1.5 feet or slightly longer. The 450-foot-long Ark would snugly fit in a football stadium and would be taller than a four-story building.
This sketch of the Ark is based on George Hagopian's credible account (page 40). The Ark did not look like a boat. It had a flat bottom, was not streamlined, and had windows in its top. The flat bottom would have made loading on dry land possible. Streamlined shapes are important only for ships designed for speed and fuel efficiency—neither of which applied to the Ark. Windows in the side might be nice for the passengers (or for the proverbial giraffes to stick their necks out), but side windows limit the depth of submergence and the maximum load. Riding low in the water gives a boat great stability. Actually, the Hebrew word for Ark does not mean boat; it means box, coffin, or chest—an apt description unknown to Hagopian.
You are believing too many things obviously. Fishes weren't on the boat, neither were insects and the likes, and God most likely summoned YOUNG animals, since they take up very little space (big elephant compared to small one). Also, you believe in species, as opposed to kinds. There are several species of dogs, lizards, bears, etc, etc....but there are no species, there are kind. Dogs, wolves, foxes, coyotes are from the original dog like animals. They can all interbreed (I've heard all can, except nobody has mentioned the fox, but I'm thinking he's doglike too)(could be wrong on the fox if he's not dog like).
I'm not personally attacking you, I'm disputing your beliefs. Analogy is not liking someone's art-doesn't mean you don't like the artist.