Re: Purpose of prayer
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:07 pm
Control?Zoe is right, Kristoffer. Honestly, what do you have to loose?
I don't know that anyone could pray to God,(the true one) unless they were in a position that they could humbly confess that maybe their own worldview (atheistic, agnostic, Hindu, whatever) is incorrect, and they are sincerely ready to submit to His existence. Is there any evidence to suggest that God will hear the prayer of an unbeleiver? Praying to God would be evidence of belief. Telling someone to 'experiment' and pretend they believe is not the same as belief, and is highly off base, IMO. Truth seeking by its nature is humility. I wouldn't dare you to pray. I'd dare you to humble yourself, and sincerely consider the evidence.
How is that biblical? The bible says that God resist the proud. If Kris is only pretending to believe to see if he gets a repsonse, then he will likely hear nothing, and then be another who says, "I prayed, and nothing happened." Thus, only further hardening his heart.What do you have to lose? If God isn't real then nothing will happen.
The Creator is not obligated to the creature.
Zoe, Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you borrowing from Arminianism here? I thought TD from a calvanist was just that. NO Goodness at all.The doctrine of total depravity doesn't necessitate people having no goodness in them, but that no goodness is perfectly good. Most "goodness" is still polluted with selfish desires or selfish motivations
Kris,If it is similar to a "Ethical Formulation of Moral Correction", then I have done that over and over again. Everyone has faults and everyone should be capable of reforming.
Trying to correct moral faults sounds like a noble endevour. However, it overlooks the main gist. You don't need correcting unless you are morally faulty. So, at best you can be a reformed sinner. A reformed sinner is still a sinner. If I murder someone, and then reform, I am still a murderer. A reformed murderer, but a murderer none-the-less. But hey, if there is no God, then there is no objective moral standard to even aspire to. Morality is just an illusion. And why should we aspire to a standard that doesn't exist?