Re: Hells Dominion by B.W. Melvin
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:18 pm
I won't argue about what we DON'T know about the surgeon's story. But what we DO know is that this man, by his own admission, was NOT a believer before saying he visited heaven. So you think that is possible - that a non Christian can go to heaven, if even briefly? On what basis would one believe this? Not only that, but he comes back with a description of heaven that is right out of the movies, and yet has NOTHING to say about seeing or God/Jesus or being aware of His presence? He comes back spewing scripturally contradicting nonsense about the living being able to converse with the dead - which, by the way, we are strictly warned to not attempt this (Deuteronomy 18:11; Isaiah 8:19). And we have not one positive example of this in scripture, and we're strongly warned that such a practice opens the door to demonic deception.
Can those who don't believe in Jesus before their death be saved AFTER they are dead. The Bible says absolutely not. And ignorance of Scripture is no excuse. Romans 2:12 tells us: "For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law." However, ARE THERE people whom might respond positively to the Gospel message if they were to hear it - sure, possibly, some. Does, at perhaps the cusp of (but BEFORE) death, Jesus reveal Himself to SOME who have never heard His message, or that this happens and no one sees this happen before some die? Possibly. But we have no way of knowing. But one thing IS certain, "ALL people everywhere" (Acts 17:30) must repent and believe in Jesus in order to be saved - BEFORE death. So if such miraculous, saving communications/appearances by Jesus happen to some (that we do not/cannot know about), all we can honestly say is, "we just don't know!"
And we have no indications that there are second chances after death: "And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment ..."
Paul, you would seem to be making an argument that we shouldn't believe God would allow those of another faith to go to hell because they don't know the truth about Jesus or the Gospel message. But Romans clearly says they ALREADY know enough to believe in God or to reject Him (and remember, Jesus is part of God, so to reject God as He has revealed Himself - even if Jesus has not been revealed to them yet - is to also reject God as He truly is).
Romans 1: "18The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse."
Notice in the above Scripture that not one word about rejecting Jesus is even mentioned. Why? This Romans passage is saying rejecting God as He has ALREADY revealed Himself - even if that hasn't included direct knowledge of Jesus and the Gospel - is enough to seal one's doom. God is saying He has ALREADY revealed enough, and it also implies that for those who would reject even the knowledge He has already given them, that further knowledge of Jesus would not profit them, as they would only reject that knowledge as well. Is this certain? We have no way of knowing or any Scriptural reason to believe otherwise.
And note the other New Age like assertions the doctor says about his experience: He describes "the Gateway or the Core" in which a being tells him, "THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO WRONG." And he comes back stating that there is no ONE religion that offers the way to God. These are all things that directly contradict the teachings found in Scripture. And so to believe the assertions of this surgeon is a very dangerous thing to buy into.
Can those who don't believe in Jesus before their death be saved AFTER they are dead. The Bible says absolutely not. And ignorance of Scripture is no excuse. Romans 2:12 tells us: "For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law." However, ARE THERE people whom might respond positively to the Gospel message if they were to hear it - sure, possibly, some. Does, at perhaps the cusp of (but BEFORE) death, Jesus reveal Himself to SOME who have never heard His message, or that this happens and no one sees this happen before some die? Possibly. But we have no way of knowing. But one thing IS certain, "ALL people everywhere" (Acts 17:30) must repent and believe in Jesus in order to be saved - BEFORE death. So if such miraculous, saving communications/appearances by Jesus happen to some (that we do not/cannot know about), all we can honestly say is, "we just don't know!"
But God's word is TRUTH! And it says "ALL PEOPLE EVERYWHERE" must repent BEFORE death.Paul stated: "God is NOT a religion, Christ is NOT a religion. We make religions to express our faith for them BUT they supersede religions."
And we have no indications that there are second chances after death: "And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment ..."
Paul, you would seem to be making an argument that we shouldn't believe God would allow those of another faith to go to hell because they don't know the truth about Jesus or the Gospel message. But Romans clearly says they ALREADY know enough to believe in God or to reject Him (and remember, Jesus is part of God, so to reject God as He has revealed Himself - even if Jesus has not been revealed to them yet - is to also reject God as He truly is).
Romans 1: "18The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse."
Notice in the above Scripture that not one word about rejecting Jesus is even mentioned. Why? This Romans passage is saying rejecting God as He has ALREADY revealed Himself - even if that hasn't included direct knowledge of Jesus and the Gospel - is enough to seal one's doom. God is saying He has ALREADY revealed enough, and it also implies that for those who would reject even the knowledge He has already given them, that further knowledge of Jesus would not profit them, as they would only reject that knowledge as well. Is this certain? We have no way of knowing or any Scriptural reason to believe otherwise.
And note the other New Age like assertions the doctor says about his experience: He describes "the Gateway or the Core" in which a being tells him, "THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO WRONG." And he comes back stating that there is no ONE religion that offers the way to God. These are all things that directly contradict the teachings found in Scripture. And so to believe the assertions of this surgeon is a very dangerous thing to buy into.