Actually, there is no real evidence for macroevolution. The more that scientists learn, the more impossible evolution gets. And we haven't even gotten into DNA or cell structure.
http://www.icr.org/article/260/
Oh my, oh my, oh my...So you give us a link from the Institute for Creation Research? To back up a point using "science"? You do realize you are, in essence, using an organization that does no scientific research, has never published any scientific research, and has no interest in doing real scientific research? That is rather ironic. The article itself is not a scientific article in the least, either.
He quotes no scientific journals, first of all.
He quotes no research, second of all, so none of the statements he makes are actually being backed up by anyone but him.
Third, his quotes of evolutionary biologists and other real scientists are out-of context one-liners and incomplete quotes (that is, he ends the quote early or or skips over parts of what is being said in the middle of the quote). Case in point: ". . . the theory of recapitulation . . . should be defunct today." 17 You see those groups of periods. Yeah, that means he just skipped big chunks of the quote and, in this case, made the quote say something completely different than what was actually said.
Fourth, even if this was a scientific article (which it is not), the article and everything it quotes is around 30 years old. Yikes. That is a long time for any scientific article to remain completely valid.
Fifth, while he is great at repeatedly saying "there is no evidence for evolution!", he completely fails to account for the evidence that scientists say they have. In essence, even as scientists show off their evidence, he is just pretending not to hear any of it and saying there is none in turn.
Sixth, even if there was no evidence for evolution, his final assertion is absurd. He says that, because there is no evidence for evolution, that creationism is proven? Hello? Talk about logical fallacies. He shows no evidence himself, so his assertion is just a bald-faced lie.
And I say this knowing that Henry Morris was a bright guy. I shudder to think that he actually graduated from the school I go to now, since he sorta wasted all that education to instead do no science for the rest of his life, but hey, at least he was happy about it. Still, try reading some real science sometime. Not 30-year-old junk from an organization that hasn't done any scientific study into evolution. Or creationism, for that matter.