Evidence for God from Science

Byblos wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 6:52 am

RickD wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:02 am

edwardmurphy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:22 pm Yep, that's me. The wild eyed lunatic who finds people who study the climate more credible than people who don't, at least when we're talking about the climate.

What about the people who study the climate, and come to the conclusion that they don't know what role, if any, mankind has in climate change? And, what about those who study the climate, and realize that the earth's climate has always been changing?

What about the con men like Al Gore, who make millions off of their chicken little scenarios?

They're all blinded by trumpism.

I think Trump Derangement Syndrome, is actually a symptom of a much greater issue.

PaulSacramento wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:27 amSo, you are saying that there aren't ANY climatologist that disagree with the "consensus" ?

Obviously I'm not saying that. Of course there are a few who disagree. But at the end of the day you have to look at the evidence in support, look at the evidence against, factor in things like corporate interests, short term profits, and who's paying the dissenting voices, and decide who to believe. I made my choice. I find the people claiming that anthropogenic climate change is a legitimate crisis to be much, much more credible than the people saying that it's not.

RickD wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:09 amI think Trump Derangement Syndrome, is actually a symptom of a much greater issue.

I think that the evidence is piling up that the President is a corrupt scumbag and anyone still talking about TDS has a bad case of their own...

You leftist snowflakes melt, simply at the mention of Trump's name!

Trump, Trump, Trump!!!!!

Now, go to your safe space!

Listen to that spontaneous adulation...

edwardmurphy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 5:37 pm

Listen to that spontaneous adulation...

Is that a Canadian Football League game, in November? Because, I sure see a lot of snowflakes!

Obviously I'm not saying that. Of course there are a few who disagree. But at the end of the day you have to look at the evidence in support, look at the evidence against, factor in things like corporate interests, short term profits, and who's paying the dissenting voices, and decide who to believe. I made my choice. I find the people claiming that anthropogenic climate change is a legitimate crisis to be much, much more credible than the people saying that it's not.

Now, all that needs to be addressed is the issues (perceived) with the data then all will be good.
That and actually coming up with viable solution's.