Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:10 pm
by M0le
Since the fall of the Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century, many Muslims have lamented the loss of a unified Muslim polity and longed for the reestablishment of a world empire. Some have organized movements with the imposition of a Muslim world order as their end goal. In recent years, there have been numerous such movements, some but not all adopting a strategy of armed struggle.
Christian2 quoting aicongree.org: So have several Christian fundamentalist groups.
By the way, if you're going to debate the legitimacy of the 2003 Invasion of Iraq, looking at the WMD/Iraq
topic in Wikipedia would be a good start.
Re: TO Judah and all
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:48 am
by puritan lad
Christian2 wrote:So what is the "moderate and true voice of Islam"?
I guess that would be someone who cuts off half of your head.
Islam is a terrorist religion. It's founder was a terrorist. It's champions and practitioners have been terrorists. Their "holy book" inspires, encourages and commands "jihad" (terrorism).
Blaming Bush for Muslim terrorism is the height of ridiculousness. America has been dealing with Muslim terrorists since Thomas Jefferson dealt with the Barbary Coast Pirates. I guess Bush caused that too, just like he caused Hurricane Katrina.
The truth is that these people want to kill you, Bush and Blair or no Bush and Blair. (Notice: In order to propogate the myth that Al Qaeda doesn't operate in Iraq, liberals will no longer call them terrorists, but "insurgents".)
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:06 am
by August
By the way, if you're going to debate the legitimacy of the 2003 Invasion of Iraq, looking at the WMD/Iraq topic in Wikipedia would be a good start
No, a good start would be to review the UN resolutions from 1990 to 2003 regarding Iraq, as well as the war resolution in the US congress.
Wikipedia is pretty much a joke, anyone can write something in there.