Page 4 of 5

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:15 pm
by zoegirl
Or any "group" such as three women, two women and one man, 10 women, 5 men and 5 women. POlygamy and of course the opposite, should be allowed.

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:32 pm
by waynepii
zoegirl wrote:Or any "group" such as three women, two women and one man, 10 women, 5 men and 5 women. POlygamy and of course the opposite, should be allowed.
Just out of curiosity, what is the "opposite" of polygamy?

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:25 pm
by B. W.
waynepii wrote:
zoegirl wrote:Or any "group" such as three women, two women and one man, 10 women, 5 men and 5 women. POlygamy and of course the opposite, should be allowed.
Just out of curiosity, what is the "opposite" of polygamy?
Animals..... y:O2

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:46 pm
by waynepii
B. W. wrote:
waynepii wrote:
zoegirl wrote:Or any "group" such as three women, two women and one man, 10 women, 5 men and 5 women. POlygamy and of course the opposite, should be allowed.
Just out of curiosity, what is the "opposite" of polygamy?
Animals..... y:O2
Few animals are competent to enter into contracts - hence they can't "marry".

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:30 pm
by zoegirl
waynepii wrote:
zoegirl wrote:Or any "group" such as three women, two women and one man, 10 women, 5 men and 5 women. POlygamy and of course the opposite, should be allowed.
Just out of curiosity, what is the "opposite" of polygamy?

COuldn't remember the word...looked it up polyandry....multiple men, one woman.

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:02 pm
by waynepii
zoegirl wrote:
waynepii wrote:
zoegirl wrote:Or any "group" such as three women, two women and one man, 10 women, 5 men and 5 women. POlygamy and of course the opposite, should be allowed.
Just out of curiosity, what is the "opposite" of polygamy?

COuldn't remember the word...looked it up polyandry....multiple men, one woman.
Ahah! Thanks

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:08 pm
by zoegirl
Yeah...I was typing my OP and for the life of me I couldn't remember that word...Certianly not really practiced today but can't certainly rule it out. ...I'm sure it's been n the Jerry Springer show already :esurprised:

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:59 am
by Harry12345
zoegirl wrote:Yeah...I was typing my OP and for the life of me I couldn't remember that word...Certianly not really practiced today but can't certainly rule it out. ...I'm sure it's been n the Jerry Springer show already :esurprised:
What hasn't been on the Jerry Springer show? :?

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:57 am
by Byblos
Harry12345 wrote: What hasn't been on the Jerry Springer show? :?
Reality?

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:07 am
by Harry12345
Byblos wrote:
Harry12345 wrote: What hasn't been on the Jerry Springer show? :?
Reality?
Some of the stuff seen on Jerry Springer is reality! y:O2

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:36 am
by For_Narniaaa
Byblos wrote:
Harry12345 wrote: What hasn't been on the Jerry Springer show? :?
Reality?
:lol:

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:43 am
by For_Narniaaa
zoegirl wrote:Or any "group" such as three women, two women and one man, 10 women, 5 men and 5 women. POlygamy and of course the opposite, should be allowed.
Yeah...if we cut the homosexuals slack, pretty soon other groups and practices will want to be accepted as "okay." Polygamy is a good example. Another is incest. Should these become "rights" as well? Of course, even if gay marriage (and things that could possibly follow) is eventually allowed, Paul's words still will ring true:

"Everything is permissible for me"—but not everything is beneficial. "Everything is permissible for me"—but I will not be mastered by anything. (I Cor. 6:12, NIV)

Legal does not equal moral.

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:31 pm
by ageofknowledge
For_Narniaaa wrote:
zoegirl wrote:Or any "group" such as three women, two women and one man, 10 women, 5 men and 5 women. POlygamy and of course the opposite, should be allowed.
Yeah...if we cut the homosexuals slack, pretty soon other groups and practices will want to be accepted as "okay." Polygamy is a good example. Another is incest. Should these become "rights" as well? Of course, even if gay marriage (and things that could possibly follow) is eventually allowed, Paul's words still will ring true:

"Everything is permissible for me"—but not everything is beneficial. "Everything is permissible for me"—but I will not be mastered by anything. (I Cor. 6:12, NIV)

Legal does not equal moral.
The bottom could go far lower than that. The only limitation to depravity are the physical limitations depraved individuals can perform in a mortal physical body.

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:20 am
by Imperial
It is an abomination for individuals who engage in homosexual practices to enter into a Scriptural marriage covenant relationship which God ordained for a man and a woman.

it's an abomination that *some* people would object to people being happy the way they are. :shakehead:

Re: Carrie Prejean's Gay Marriage Controversy

Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:16 pm
by ageofknowledge
Harry12345 wrote:
zoegirl wrote:Yeah...I was typing my OP and for the life of me I couldn't remember that word...Certianly not really practiced today but can't certainly rule it out. ...I'm sure it's been n the Jerry Springer show already :esurprised:
What hasn't been on the Jerry Springer show? :?
Me. I have an entire episode planned but they won't let me on. They said something about it being all too inflammatory.

:pound: