Re: Did you "receive Jesus" the Jesus way, or man's way?
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:13 pm
Wha?TallMan wrote:Ah, the pagan eternal soul doctrine.Jac3510 wrote: . . . Your eternal soul may well hang in the balance.
"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
Wha?TallMan wrote:Ah, the pagan eternal soul doctrine.Jac3510 wrote: . . . Your eternal soul may well hang in the balance.
Good idea.Jac3510 wrote:Byblos,
Might I suggest moving this thread to the "Aberrant Christianity" section? If you do a bit of googling, you'll find the group has many of the characteristics of common cults (i.e., no fellowship with ex-members, discouragement of reading non RCI material, excessive control of personal life by the pastoral staff, compulsory meetings, etc.)?
I think the title of the thread enough should warrant the move. It's typical of the "my church is the only true church" mentality, which is directly derived from the "restored movement" mentality common to all cults.
Just my $.02.
If you knew what true fellowship is you would applaud this stand.Jac3510 wrote: no fellowship with ex-members
Are members of your church encouraged to read material of groups that you disagree with?Jac3510 wrote:discouragement of reading non RCI material,
People that rejected the message of Jesus & Paul were quick to receive accusations against them as true. Nothing new here folks!Jac3510 wrote:excessive control of personal life by the pastoral staff, compulsory meetings, etc.)?
Can you please name the true churches?Jac3510 wrote:I think the title of the thread enough should warrant the move. It's typical of the "my church is the only true church" mentality, which is directly derived from the "restored movement" mentality common to all cults.
I agree with that part.Jac3510 wrote:Just my $.02.
True Scottsman fallacy.If you knew what true fellowship is you would applaud this stand.
As a matter of fact, yes, I encourage them heavily to read material with which I disagree. As far as you not being RCI, no, you are RFI, which formed from a schism with RCI over the reenstatement of sexually impure members.Are members of your church encouraged to read material of groups that you disagree with?
Is that appropriate shepherding of people?
(btw, I/we are not RCI)
Yes, because Jesus forced Himself on people. One of the truest marks of a cult is their authoritarian control of people's personal lives.People that rejected the message of Jesus & Paul were quick to receive accusations against them as true. Nothing new here folks!
Ac:24:14: But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:
Sure. Everyone who believes the Gospel, which you, in this thread, have denied (John 1:12).Can you please name the true churches?
You havn't named any!Jac3510 wrote:Sure. Everyone who believes the Gospel, which you, in this thread, have denied (John 1:12).Can you please name the true churches?
TallMan wrote:You havn't named any!Jac3510 wrote:Sure. Everyone who believes the Gospel, which you, in this thread, have denied (John 1:12).Can you please name the true churches?
Can you name 2 or 3 in your area?
These people run true churches?B. W. wrote: John Simpson, Mary Banks, George Hederson, Susan McHugh, Jonathan Square, Melvin Johnson, John Stocker, Joyce Meyer, and the list goes on and on... and that is more than three...
I do not mean the Joyce Meyer's who is famous but another woman of the same name - unknown. These are people who attended many churches in my location in Colorado!TallMan wrote:These people run true churches?B. W. wrote: John Simpson, Mary Banks, George Hederson, Susan McHugh, Jonathan Square, Melvin Johnson, John Stocker, Joyce Meyer, and the list goes on and on... and that is more than three...
I'm from England so I only know Joyce Mayer . . how does one become a member of her church?
I've watched her meetings on TV, many of the elements God says he wants in 1 Cor. 11 - 14 were not there.
I noe you havn't listed any of what people would call "main-stream denominations".
jlay wrote:B.W.
Thanks for clarifying the Joyce Meyer thing. You had me scared there for a minute.
But back on topic.
Where are the tares?
Where are the wolves in sheeps clothing?
The tares are among the wheat. The wolves are among the sheep. The "church," if we call it, is not identified with a "creed" or what sign in on the post outside. Jesus teaches that the REAL church will have imposters in it. Now, I would be absolutely crazy if I said the only way you could tell if your church was the "real" church was if you had charlatans in your congregation. Ridiculous. I would be misappropiating the scripture.
And sadly Tallman's church has chosen tongues as a point to determine salvation. I can only imagine the pressure children in this congregation must feel to "speak" tongues. And how many grow up faking it. And this is exactly what Paul was writing about in Corinthians. The letter is clearly a rebuke and correction for something that was wrong within the church.
Indeed, rather than visit and see, you prefer to air your imaginations . . . which just so happen to justify what you want to believe.jlay wrote: . ..And sadly Tallman's church has chosen tongues as a point to determine salvation. I can only imagine the pressure children in this congregation must feel to "speak" tongues. And how many grow up faking it.
Was it??jlay wrote: And this is exactly what Paul was writing about in Corinthians.
Anyone who speaks english could discern that from the letter . . . but can you see from the detail what exactly was wrong?jlay wrote:The letter is clearly a rebuke and correction for something that was wrong within the church.
I visited the link you provided and have read your posts. If the information is bad then whose fault is that?Indeed, rather than visit and see, you prefer to air your imaginations