Re Nr.3: No matter how hard we try it's impossible to prove that robots have consciousness, feelings or free will, true preferences, etc. because we programmed them to act a certain way, therefore:
1) All their actions will be fully deterministic, which makes it hard to believe they could really dislike or like anything.
2) We made them act a certain way and express themselves a certain way, therefore, even if they do not actually feel anything they will properly respond to inputs we might give them (see also: John Searles' Chinese room experiment).
We can also demonstrate the futility of discovering what they actually think or feel by bringing up another problem: Knowing whether or not people see different colors the same way. Think about it: Can you possibly disprove that what you see as orange, someone else sees as purple, but since we learn colors by seeing them, they also recognize that thing as being orange? No, you can't, because you only have one way of identifying colors and no possibility of testing it.
As for developing intelligent robots, the most powerful supercomputers in the world today have in reality about as much processing power as a bumblebee
. People often think of computers as being smart, when in fact computers are simply machines - they take inputs and react to them. That is all they can ever do. Computers such as we have, or for that matter any computer, no matter how powerful, as long as it is based on such things as Boolean logic and mathematical algorithms is not capable of creativity, emotion or sentient thought.
I think, in fact, that this is evidence for a soul, because essentially, the brain is also an organic machine and materialistic accounts of thought fail to account for the aforementioned things in the same way.
Btw, 1over, "Please summarize the evidence for God" is not a valid statement. There are those sort of "summaries", but they take up whole websites, not single posts in a forum.
The first step to learning is to admit that you don't know.