Evidence for God from Science

No one would heal for money.

Byblos wrote:

Kenny wrote:

1over137 wrote:

Kenny wrote: He spoke of things happening outside the laws of nature, I mentioned a person who had a million dollare challenge for anyone who could demonstrate acts outside the laws of nature and it hasn't been collected on

K

Does it prove something that nobody showed up in 30 years for that challenge?

Well actually lots of people have showed up; they were just shown to be a fraud.

Ken

Of course they will all be frauds.The only one who can prove beyond any doubt that miracles could happen is God. And I don't think He's up to taking bets.

So are you suggesting all those Christians who claim miracles happen, are unable to prove it?

Ken

1over137 wrote:No one would heal for money.

Would someone heal to silence a skeptic who goes around claiming faith healers are frauds? And is convincing others that they are frauds?

Ken

Kenny wrote:

1over137 wrote:No one would heal for money.

Would someone heal to silence a skeptic who goes around claiming faith healers are frauds? And is convincing others that they are frauds?

Ken

maybe

1over137 wrote:

Kenny wrote:

1over137 wrote:No one would heal for money.

Would someone heal to silence a skeptic who goes around claiming faith healers are frauds? And is convincing others that they are frauds?

Ken

maybe

Yet nobody has sucessfully silenced him which brings credibilityto his claims

Ken

Kenny wrote:

1over137 wrote:

Kenny wrote:

1over137 wrote:No one would heal for money.

Would someone heal to silence a skeptic who goes around claiming faith healers are frauds? And is convincing others that they are frauds?

Ken

maybe

Yet nobody has sucessfully silenced him which brings credibilityto his claims

Ken

Why? Does that man want to be healed? Does that man desire God? Can that man be humble enough? I do not know him. Do you know him? Should God silence all such people walking on this planet?

Didn't you say; maybe he would silence him? A voice from the sky confirmed by today's technology proclaiming himself to be God would silence him; don't cha think?

Ken

Kenny wrote:Didn't you say; maybe he would silence him? A voice from the sky confirmed by today's technology proclaiming himself to be God would silence him; don't cha think?

Ken

So, because nobody has silenced him, and because there is no voice from the sky, the man's claims are credible?

1over137 wrote:

Kenny wrote:Didn't you say; maybe he would silence him? A voice from the sky confirmed by today's technology proclaiming himself to be God would silence him; don't cha think?

Ken

So, because nobody has silenced him, and because there is no voice from the sky, the man's claims are credible?

His credibility is determined on a case by case basis. But the thread is about God addressing the world; not James Randi.

Ken

Kenny wrote:

1over137 wrote:

Kenny wrote:Didn't you say; maybe he would silence him? A voice from the sky confirmed by today's technology proclaiming himself to be God would silence him; don't cha think?

Ken

So, because nobody has silenced him, and because there is no voice from the sky, the man's claims are credible?

His credibility is determined on a case by case basis. But the thread is about God addressing the world; not James Randi.

Ken

Read Matthew 11.

1over137 wrote:

Kenny wrote:

1over137 wrote:

Kenny wrote:Didn't you say; maybe he would silence him? A voice from the sky confirmed by today's technology proclaiming himself to be God would silence him; don't cha think?

Ken

So, because nobody has silenced him, and because there is no voice from the sky, the man's claims are credible?

His credibility is determined on a case by case basis. But the thread is about God addressing the world; not James Randi.

Ken

Read Matthew 11.

Hana,

Kenny is going to tell YOU to read Matthew 11, and tell him what it means. Starting to think Kenny doesn't like to read and comprehend.

RickD wrote:

1over137 wrote:

Kenny wrote:

1over137 wrote:

Kenny wrote:Didn't you say; maybe he would silence him? A voice from the sky confirmed by today's technology proclaiming himself to be God would silence him; don't cha think?

Ken

So, because nobody has silenced him, and because there is no voice from the sky, the man's claims are credible?

His credibility is determined on a case by case basis. But the thread is about God addressing the world; not James Randi.

Ken

Read Matthew 11.

Hana,

Kenny is going to tell YOU to read Matthew 11, and tell him what it means. Starting to think Kenny doesn't like to read and comprehend.

It's not that I don't like to read and comprehend; it's just that in my experience when I ask a person a question, when they direct me to a book, website, link, or some other source to answer my question rather than giving a straight answer in their own words; 99% of the times this other source does not even address my question let alone answer it; thus it winds up being a complete waste of time. Usually when a person has an answer, weather they got it from a book, link, website or what-ever; they will give the answer in their own words rather than direct me to the source they got their information from

Ken

And Matthew 11? Seen no answer?

Hmm, 99%. Sounds too much.

1over137 wrote:And Matthew 11? Seen no answer?

Hmm, 99%. Sounds too much.

Naah! 99% is about right!

K

And Matthew 11?