Page 4 of 4

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:55 am
by PaulSacramento
RickD wrote:
PaulSacramento wrote:The only time I got really sick from the flu is when I took a flu vaccine !
Never took one again, never had the flu since then.
That cannot be Paul. How many times do I have to tell you, "YOU CANNOT GET THE FLU FROM THE FLU VACCINE!!!!"


Apparently, you need to just learn to drink the Kool-Aid too. :shock:
I don't do kool-aid, I am old school, bring me the Tang !

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 7:53 am
by RickD
PaulSacramento wrote:
RickD wrote:
PaulSacramento wrote:The only time I got really sick from the flu is when I took a flu vaccine !
Never took one again, never had the flu since then.
That cannot be Paul. How many times do I have to tell you, "YOU CANNOT GET THE FLU FROM THE FLU VACCINE!!!!"


Apparently, you need to just learn to drink the Kool-Aid too. :shock:
I don't do kool-aid, I am old school, bring me the Tang !
I used to love Tang!

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:20 am
by PaulSacramento
Better than Kool-Aid IMO.

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:31 am
by RickD
PaulSacramento wrote:Better than Kool-Aid IMO.
And much better than cyanide laced Jim Jones Kool-Aid. y8-X

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 12:44 pm
by PaulSacramento
RickD wrote:
PaulSacramento wrote:Better than Kool-Aid IMO.
And much better than cyanide laced Jim Jones Kool-Aid. y8-X
y:O2

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:05 pm
by Furstentum Liechtenstein
PaulSacramento wrote:I don't do kool-aid, I am old school, bring me the Tang !
RickD wrote:I used to love Tang!
Anyone who knows what Tang is, is very olde.

FL :wheelchair:

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 6:44 pm
by Audie
Danieltwotwenty wrote:Ok people's lets ave' it.

Vaccination's in my opinion are worth the .001 % (not sure of accuracy, but you get the point) risk, if we didn't vaccinate we would still have polio and a whole host of other diseases which would have killed and maimed millions.

Yes vaccinations contain "harmful" chemicals, but the dosages we are talking are minuscule and are within safe limits.

I don't know what other countries are like but in Australia, these vaccinations are rigorously tested before the government gives it the stamp of approval, we actually have one of the most stringent guidelines in the world for pharmaceuticals products.

To read more about immunisation shots in Australia:

http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv ... tions?open

https://www.science.org.au/immunisation

http://www.immunise.health.gov.au/

http://www.immunise.health.gov.au/inter ... -guideprov
Thought you meant wax. That's for girls who need to, not me.

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 3:28 pm
by Nessa
We did some vaccines with our kids but stopped at ones that had their origins in aborted fetal cells. There's alot of controversy surrounding this. Alot saying it's not true. Though our doctor herself admitted it. Here in NZ its the MMR rubella vaccine.

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:09 pm
by Audie
y>:D<

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:17 pm
by Nessa
Audie wrote:
Thought you meant wax. That's for girls who need to, not me.
You don't have hair? y:-?

Re: TO VAX OR NOT TO VAX, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 6:21 pm
by Audie
Not there