lol Oops. I'm not one for delving into exegesis without looking at the context, (because that's stupid, of course,) but you caught me!
I apologize for contributing to this discussion in basically willful ignorance.
I am glad that it brought about B.W.'s study, however, (thank you for that, B.W.,) and I'm also glad that my ignorant analysis led to my seeing this very old "vision" I had for what I'm sure it must have been. I always wondered, not only what the heck that vision was for, but why in the world would, if the vision were accurate, my old dog want to leave heaven so desperately to come back to me??? She had this intensely sad and full of desperation yearning in her eyes, but it just doesn't make sense. I mean, she, (a gentle pitbull named Ribeye,) may have loved me as I loved her, but no love could be strong enough to cause you to want to leave heaven and God's presence for earth and the presence of a loved human!
lol But I suppose no one here is even taking my account seriously. Oh well. *shrugs shoulders*
I do find it ironic, however, that B.W. would, after going into a detailed analysis of those verses, just tack on a, to my eyes, simplistic view of the verse in which Jesus is stated to ride a horse. "Since the bible mentions the Lord riding a horse we can assume that there are animals in heaven." Didn't you just prove that the Bible can't be taken at such face-value from reading one verse? Or is it simply that you view Revelations as entirely literal? I take it symbolically for the most part.
And here's some things to wonder about if animals really did go to heaven:
~Do all animals that ever existed, even for just their births, get to go?
~If the above is not true, then which ones are qualified?
~What are the qualifications based on? Human love for the animal?
~How is the love to be judged? If I see a roaming cat and feel fondness for it and a desire to take it in if it happened to be un-owned, does that count the same as taking it in and caring for it the rest of my life with an ever growing fondness?
~If all animals a human ever felt fondness for are the qualified ones, then what about those people who love all animals, period, even if they never happened to see the animal?
~And if any human fondness is the qualification, because of the people stated just above, wouldn't all animals or critters ever born be qualified? What if someone highly respects the mosquito?? Aren't mosquitos, and for that matter the leg-less snake, the result of a world cursed by sin?? Did Eden have mosquitos, who live off the blood of others, when all animals and critters before the Fall were lived entirely off vegetation? Did the mosquitos suck on fruit???
~And if all animals ever birthed go to heaven...
No, I won't continue. Frankly, it's absolutely absurd. God never said that animals go to heaven- simply that Christ rode on a symbolic white horse, (and don't forget the forse horsemen of the apocalypse, which one would be absurd to think aren't be figurative in my mind). And anyway, let's get back to the purpose of God creating animals. In heaven, as I stated in my previous post, we won't have the same need for them as Adam did in Eden. We'll be in God's presence among all believers throughout history. And really, I don't
want mosquitos in heaven! If they were meant to suck on fruit, then fine, let them be in the millennial kingdom, where God keeps the earth as it was meant to be, where we're all vegetarians and man has use for animal companions and marriage. But no, I don't want lizards and snakes and spiders in heaven, with me forever. There's a purpose and a place for everything as God makes clear, and animals and critters were meant for the current earth, not the new heavens and earth.
Incidentally, I know a woman who loves and highly respects spiders. She might want them to be in heaven with her, (if she were to make it there, that is.) Look, just because you love your dog doesn't give you reason to say that God wants him in heaven with you. We won't need marriage, and we won't need beasts.