Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:53 pm
what i find 'funny' is that the a person who is asked the question is telling the questioner what it means.
IT WASN'T A GENETIC QUESTION!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT WASN'T A GENETIC QUESTION!!!!!!!!!!!!
"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
archaeologist wrote:what i find 'funny' is that the a person who is asked the question is telling the questioner what it means.
IT WASN'T A GENETIC QUESTION!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO IT DOESN"T. i am the questioner, i know what it requires, you obviously do not.The answer requires addressing genetics
NO it doesn't. i gave an example and you denied it right away.Again. ANYTIME you ask about ANYTHING to do with populations responding to an environmental change, it will have to do with genetics
Do we have any scriptural accounts of the laws of Gravity? Or how the heart beats? Or any number of other misc. items the bible does not cover? The Bible is not a catch all. many things (all unimportant to our salvation) are not covered. Just because the bible doesnt' brings it up doesn't mean the bible says it isn't true.micr0-evolution does not exist, neither does evolution. do we have any scriptural account that describes God creating the process of evolution?
I don't completely understand genetics. Arch, would you mind EXPLAINING to me why the question doesn't involve it? I think zoe has done a well enough job of explaining why it does, and just to continually shouting that it doesn't isn't going to change my mind.Quote:
The answer requires addressing genetics
NO IT DOESN"T. i am the questioner, i know what it requires, you obviously do not.
If you're referring to the Tsunami example, i think i might cry.NO it doesn't. i gave an example and you denied it right away.
I am a bit confused, you original question was as follows.archaeologist wrote:micr0-evolution does not exist, neither does evolution. do we have any scriptural account that describes God creating the process of evolution?
the theory of evolution is a human construct designed to detour people from what God has done. 2 peter 3:3ff you might want to thro in 2 Thess. 2 as well.
NO IT DOESN"T. i am the questioner, i know what it requires, you obviously do not.The answer requires addressing genetics
NO it doesn't. i gave an example and you denied it right away.Again. ANYTIME you ask about ANYTHING to do with populations responding to an environmental change, it will have to do with genetics
this is a prime example of people who look to prove their studies in everything even when they do not apply.
archaeologist wrote:so i am waiting for an answer to my question. it is not a hard one to answer nor does it need long clarifications. it is a simple question asking what you attribute their plight.
archaeologist wrote:don't give me [poop], just an answer.
Which leads to the confusion I mentioned earlier...archaeologist wrote:you didn't answer the question.
True there are many things the Bible does not specifically address. The difference I see here, is evolution is being used to replace God is some ways and this is what makes it significant. The implication that evolution, micro or macro supports life and survivability somehow seems to diminish God.Enigma7457 wrote:Do we have any scriptural accounts of the laws of Gravity? Or how the heart beats? Or any number of other misc. items the bible does not cover?
Yep, I'm rather goodEnigma7457 wrote:Ummm....
Does anyone know how to play freecell?
because there is a point to be made which has been lost because someone kept avoiding answering the question.But you state above that one of the options does not exist. Namely microevolution.
Why ask a question in which there is only one(In your worldview) possible answer
sorry i missed it. the reason it has nothing to do with genetics is that the question was calling for a personal opinion on a situation that is not genetically related. i wanted to see what the person's position was and how they would label the polar bear's troubles.I don't completely understand genetics. Arch, would you mind EXPLAINING to me why the question doesn't involve it? I think zoe has done a well enough job of explaining why it does, and just to continually shouting that it doesn't isn't going to change my mind
maybe not in those words but there are indicators, i believe Job 38 would touch on it in its style of writing. i will have to check. but in any case even if it doesn't, we have numerous scriptures which specifically cite creation not any evolutionary method or process, then we have Jesus words:Do we have any scriptural accounts of the laws of Gravity?
she said any change at any time so it was a good example along with mt. st. helens, the new orleans hurricanes and so on. also the reason one cannot solely depend on genectics is because it does not take into account the spiritual factor, both good and evil. genetics like any other science is very limited.If you're referring to the Tsunami example, i think i might cry.