Re: Does 666 Spell Rockefeller?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:18 am
Very good post FL,
Please continue the Revelaton/Church comments, excelent!
-
-
-
Please continue the Revelaton/Church comments, excelent!
-
-
-
"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
Well said.Summary
There are honest people who genuinely love the God of the Bible, even in heretical churches. God knows who they are and promises them a future with Him. God also sternly warns them not to pay attention to false teachings of self-styled prophets whose end will be in hell. There are a lot of such churches today. Can you name any of them? If you can't, what does that say about your knowledge of the Bible?
PaulSacramento wrote:Well said.
Well...thanks! Thank God, rather, because I'm not smart enough.B. W. wrote:Please continue the Revelaton/Church comments, excelent!
The problem with a commentary such as Aune's is that it is not adapted to the average Christian, and so the books will most probably sit on a shelf gathering dust. If you can distill what you've learned from Aune then your comments would be most appreciated here.PaulSacramento wrote:If you like the book of Revelation then you may love this commentary on it by David Aune.
It is 3 volumes and it covers EVERYTHING and I mean EVERYTHING !
Thanks! I've found my notes and am in the process of making sense out of them.B. W. wrote:I enjoy your coments on the churches - the state of the church is well summed up!!!
Then you've missed the point! ''Revelation'' means ''a revealing'' and it is meant to be an easily-understandable book. And it is! I have deliberately tried for a succinct verse-by-verse study so far, leaving behind a lot of information that would just clutter up the page and bore people but if you feel that I'm leaving behind something important - or, worse, mistaken - you should speak up. If you say ''we part ways'' from Rev 1:4 then we've got a serious problem. I stated early on that the reason for this study was for us to all be ''on the same page,'' that is all agreeing. Otherwise, we just let foolishness continue and call Obama the Antichrist...or Amadinejab...or the internet...or flying saucers. Take your pick.Grizz_1 wrote:FL, I was following it. But after Rev 1:4 we part ways. lol Instead of it becoming dis-jointed I figured I'd let you finish then I'd chime in. I appreciate your efforts, it is quite an undertaking and although I'm sure we will disagree on a lot of it, its always nice to see another point of view. Thanks!
Fair enough, it is a long and sometimes painful read, LOL !The problem with a commentary such as Aune's is that it is not adapted to the average Christian, and so the books will most probably sit on a shelf gathering dust. If you can distill what you've learned from Aune then your comments would be most appreciated here.
Painful?! I would force prisonners condemned of first degree murder to read Aune over and over again until they commit suicide.*PaulSacramento wrote:Fair enough, [Aune] is a long and sometimes painful read, LOL !
OK...my study on Revelation 3:1-6 (Sardis) is complete. It is quite long, considering I'm a two-finger typist. I'll post it by tomorrow - Monday - the latest.Grizz_1 wrote:Yes, I agree Revelation is an easily understandable book. I will try and tell you what I know. I'll make a more in depth post on Friday... work and such will keep me till then. I also agree that "we have a serious problem" as you stated. But we will discuss the problem.
Let's move on then...Furstentum Liechtenstein wrote: Anyone can participate in this exposition. Even if you think the Seven Spirits of God (Rev 1:4) are Confucius, Buddha, Moses, Krishna, Jesus, Mohammed and the Ba'hai-guy, I'll let it stand without challenge. If the seven stars are seven planets in the Pleiades, I'll let that stand as well. So let this be a rule: if someone posts an exposition on some part of Revelation, the other participants will let it stand as is and move on to the next verses.