Evidence for God from Science

Audie wrote:Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

*Kurieuo refrains from competing*

Kurieuo wrote:

Audie wrote:Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

*Kurieuo refrains from competing*

Its not much of a spectator sport. Nor fun to compete. You have the right idea.

Audie wrote:Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

And I'm not sunburned anyway. I was out in the sun too long, then I got red.

RickD wrote:

Audie wrote:Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

And I'm not sunburned anyway. I was out in the sun too long, then I got red.

I wont compete in that. I stay out of the sun.

Audie wrote:

RickD wrote:

Audie wrote:Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

And I'm not sunburned anyway. I was out in the sun too long, then I got red.

I wont compete in that. I stay out of the sun.

Apparently, you stay out of rational thinking too.

Come now RD, thats not up to even your standards. here, I didnt quote you, you can delete so nobody else sees it.

Audie wrote:Come now RD, thats not up to even your standards. here, I didnt quote you, you can delete so nobody else sees it.

Audie,

I was referring only, and specifically to what you wrote here:

Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

Doesn't that describe being bipolar?

RickD wrote:

Audie wrote:Come now RD, thats not up to even your standards. here, I didnt quote you, you can delete so nobody else sees it.

Audie,

I was referring only, and specifically to what you wrote here:

Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

Doesn't that describe being bipolar?

I dont want to give a serious answer nor a flip one either, so, I guess this is my non response.

Audie wrote:

RickD wrote:

Audie wrote:Come now RD, thats not up to even your standards. here, I didnt quote you, you can delete so nobody else sees it.

Audie,

I was referring only, and specifically to what you wrote here:

Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

Doesn't that describe being bipolar?

I dont want to give a serious answer nor a flip one either, so, I guess this is my non response.

Oh, one of your usual non-answers. Ok. Then I rest my case.

RickD wrote:

Audie wrote:

RickD wrote:

Audie wrote:Come now RD, thats not up to even your standards. here, I didnt quote you, you can delete so nobody else sees it.

Audie,

I was referring only, and specifically to what you wrote here:

Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

Doesn't that describe being bipolar?

I dont want to give a serious answer nor a flip one either, so, I guess this is my non response.

Oh, one of your usual non-answers. Ok. Then I rest my case.

Whats with you today?

Audie wrote:

RickD wrote:

Audie wrote:

RickD wrote:

Audie wrote:Come now RD, thats not up to even your standards. here, I didnt quote you, you can delete so nobody else sees it.

Audie,

I was referring only, and specifically to what you wrote here:

Im not bipolar anyway. I just am kinda excitable, then get depressed.

Doesn't that describe being bipolar?

I dont want to give a serious answer nor a flip one either, so, I guess this is my non response.

Oh, one of your usual non-answers. Ok. Then I rest my case.

Whats with you today?

My dog is with me today. Oh...and my son is on spring break. Why?

As your grammar nazi, I must point out that your son is not a "what" so much as a "who".

Audie wrote:As your grammar nazi, I must point out that your son is not a "what" so much as a "who".

I would disagree. Isn't he just a buncha atoms?

Furstentum Liechtenstein wrote:

Audie wrote:We're listing people whose economic advice is worth following.So like, get with the program already.

I think Caesar Millan could give excellent advice on how to succeed in the world but he's a big Zero in the spiritual arena, what with his temple to Buddha at his kennel.

Anyway, what does this have to do with the biblical injunction against Christians having yachts? I really wish we'd stay on topic.)

FL

FL,

I know you were talking about a biblical injunction against Christians having yachts. But what about if pastors try to fleece the flock to the tune of $65 millon, for a private jet? This folks, is the prosperity gospel in full bloom. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.2150876

RickD wrote:FL, I know you were talking about a biblical injunction against Christians having yachts. But what about if pastors try to fleece the flock to the tune of $65 millon, for a private jet? This folks, is the prosperity gospel in full bloom. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.2150876

I must admit that when I read the piece on Prophit Dollar's new-to-him Gulfstream IV, I was shocked! Why would God's servant fly around in a used jet? A jet which had undoubtedly seen the basest of secular human activities! Prophit Dollar has shown exemplary restraint in purchasing a used Gulfstream which will only have an hourly operating cost of $20,000! Just think: to prop up his ego, a lesser servant may have bought a new jet, perhaps a 3-engined Dassault Falcon, with operating costs of $30,000 per hour! I thank God for servants who administer the fleeced's flock's money with parsimony.

Now to the matter of your lack of understanding of the Bible...yachts, as I have shown, are verboten to the Christian but jets are OK. Actually, any flying machine is blessed by God! Have you not read Isa 40:31? How can a man soar if not in an airplane? It's in your Bible! Plain as day for you to see!

Be at peace with this matter, Ricardo. The Lord has blessed all of us according to His Will. Do not condemn another Bother in Christ who has a Gulfstream IV. Do I condemn you because you have a 550HP Mustang? No! now go, and be content with your station in life.

FL