Re: The scientific proof for Genesis
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:06 pm
I believe it is rooted in Jewish tradition not to spell the entire word out of respect.touchingcloth wrote:How comes you keep putting a - instead of an o in god?
"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
I believe it is rooted in Jewish tradition not to spell the entire word out of respect.touchingcloth wrote:How comes you keep putting a - instead of an o in god?
Well yes but I've never seen it done with english words before...with yahweh we put the missing letters back in!Byblos wrote:I believe it is rooted in Jewish tradition not to spell the entire word out of respect.touchingcloth wrote:How comes you keep putting a - instead of an o in god?
It's in 2 Corinthians 4:4...CAT wrote:Gman, you have me stumped, what two gods are you talking about?
Ah, no.. We have to look at scripture in the Hebrew for a better analysis.CAT wrote:Yes, I realize that you were referring to the link between science and the Bible, which you proved nicely, thank you. I was merely just pointing the fact out to you that "NOW" (after you have proved this fact) you cannot simply go on believing that these 7 days took place over million or billions of years, that it why I said you cannot serve both G-d and man, its either one or the other. If you change G-d's literal word into something that it is not, you are than serving man.
Sounds like it will be fun anyway. Something I was wanting to get to. Then again I would be on Gman's side, I am an OEC.Gman wrote:CAT. Can you do me a favor? I would love to debate this, but not in this post. This is more how the creation story aligns with science not the day age stuff. If you start another post on this we can debate it there.