Page 6 of 7
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:30 am
by 1over137
Kurieuo wrote:I'll let you cast the first stone swordfish since I'm not without sin myself. Furthermore, I'm now legally married to the woman I fornicated with for 8 years and we have four children who God blessed us with. She also became a Christian during our fornicating together, which I'm thankful to God for. God is truly great!
K, may I ask?
So first your wife was a Christian, right?
Has she struggled a lot being a Christian and being with you not married?
What abour the church?
edit: if it was you who was first Christian then what about your feelings and struggles?
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:59 pm
by Kurieuo
No, my wife when we came together wasnt Christian. I wasn't going to marry her until she became one, as it's one thing to subject myself to a non-Christian and another level of irresponsibility to subject your own kids and their souls, but I was quite assured she would. Had it on what I believed to be good word.
It'd be quite a different situation if we were married at the time one of us became Christian, difficult, make me feel sicky even at the thought of my loved one being lost especially if kids were there. I'm not sure, with everything else and taking my beliefs so strongly, I don't believe I could remain living together in such a situation. Separation didn't necessarily mean divorce , but it would set down firm boundaries that if she wanted me, then she'd need to really start seriously considering what I believe and come around. In fact, I told her flatly I wouldn't marry her until she became Christian.
She considered me quite naive, we'd have the occasional heated exchange about Adam and Eve, Evolution, Noah, and the like. About 4 years in, went to an Alpha with her, started up going to church and she tact along with me, and then she eventually became moved and answered an alter call
Yours is an extra difficult situation, given the more complicated health circumstances, I don't envy you and admire your resolve and character..
It doesn't always turn out well and I was "lucky" (if it be called luck rather than providence). I've heard other stories of couples, commitment just doesn't cut it. Sometimes not even legal marriage cuts it given the high divorce rates, Scripture alikens taking on someone new rather than being reconciled to fornicating also. Thankfully we can depend upon God's righteousness offered via Christ, because God and I both know I lack plenty of it.
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:25 am
by 1over137
But my husband was healthy when I married him. (after 10 years)
I was not that firm as you and married a non-Christian.
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:18 am
by Kurieuo
But, you only became Christian a couple years ago?
Nonetheless, consider that not even the Apostle Paul gives a precise right and wrong way of what to do in such situations.
If he wished to remain with you, and you guys were "married" in God's eyes, then it is fine to honour such a commitment.
Who's to say he won't be saved on your account.
In my instance, my thoughts were that I wouldn't have legally married if she/until she became Christian.
But, I never expected she wouldn't come to Christ, and thankfully she did and it worked out.
Details are always different, I may have done exactly the same thing as you in your situation. I don't know how God was guiding you. I don't have all the details of your own situation. BUT, I do trust you made the best decisions according to your knowledge and what you felt God desired.
In all of it, don't lose sight of the fact you're not alone, in your decisions. Don't discount God putting bumper bars around you, He can still guide you regardless of your decisions, blowing strongly to steer you one way rather than letting you go another.
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:55 am
by 1over137
I became Christian on 3rd June 2011.
I was confused a lot before we married and surrendered to my feelings too.
Now I learn how hard it is when your spouse and his family are not Christians.
Kind of alone.
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:40 pm
by Kurieuo
1over137 wrote:I became Christian on 3rd June 2011.
I was confused a lot before we married and surrendered to my feelings too.
Now I learn how hard it is when your spouse and his family are not Christians.
Kind of alone.
Gosh, time flies... 5 years this month! Congrats. Wish I had a set day to remember my true birth.
I can only picture all the snide remarks, insinutations and looks. In addition to day-to-day stuff that you have to go through, would make things extremely more difficult.
Remember, you have the Shepherd guiding you with His rod and staff. Often it only becomes clear years later once you reach a destination He was taking you to and then you reflect upon your life. Also,
- A Thorn in the Flesh
7 Because of the surpassing greatness of the revelations, for this reason, to keep me from exalting myself, there was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to torment me—to keep me from exalting myself! 8 Concerning this I implored the Lord three times that it might leave me. 9 And He has said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness.” Most gladly, therefore, I will rather boast about my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may dwell in me. 10 Therefore I am well content with weaknesses, with insults, with distresses, with persecutions, with difficulties, for Christ’s sake; for when I am weak, then I am strong. (2 Corinthians 12:7-10)
It doesn't make it much easier to bare, err bear, but consider what
Desiring God's article says of verse 10:
- I think the safest way to answer is to let the four other words in verse 10 fill out what he has in mind. What he summarizes as weaknesses in verse 9 he spells out in four other words in verse 10: insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities.
- Insults—when people think of clever ways of making your faith or your lifestyle or your words look stupid or weird or inconsistent. When we were giving out "Finding Your Field of Dreams" at the dome, I heard one man say mockingly, "And the Lord said, Play ball." And all his friends laughed.
- Hardships—circumstances forced upon you, reversals of fortune against your will. This could refer to any situation where you feel trapped. You didn't plan it or think it would be this way. But there you are, and it's hard.
- Persecutions—wounds or abuses or painful circumstances or acts of prejudice or exploitation from people because of your Christian faith or your Christian moral commitments. It's when you are not treated fairly. You get a raw deal.
- Calamities (or distresses or difficulties or troubles)—the idea is one of pressure or crushing or being weighed down; circumstances that tend to overcome you with stress and tension.
You're being made strong Hana.
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 4:32 am
by 1over137
snide remarks, insinuations.... No, there are no
it is sufficient to deal with this hard situation and not having Christian soul here
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 4:50 am
by Storyteller
Hana, my love.
You don't
see God but you know He is with you. Same thing with us, you don't see us but we are here for you, and with you.
Yes, it's hard sometimes, to be the only believer in a family but you have to trust that it's all part of it.
K, I wish there were words to describe how your post affected me. As I read it, that verse, it was like reading my inner thoughts. I found the answer to why.
All my life I have felt like an underdog. Ridiculed, bullied, or ignored. I felt insignificant, and alone. Through Christ I am finding my significance, my purpose. To love and honour God.
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 4:56 am
by 1over137
K, your post had fruits
Annete, once I can, I wish to visit you one day, there at the ocean where you are ...
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 5:06 am
by Storyteller
Absolutely for sure Hana.
And you are so right about the post K made. I am going to copy out that verse and put it on my bathroom mirror. Learn it by heart. When I read that verse, it was like the world paused for a minute so i could recognise the significance of it.
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 5:59 am
by 1over137
"My grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness"
seeing that verse again
good to see it
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:14 pm
by B. W.
Here is something to consider...
King David...
A man after God's own heart as the bible reveals...
Did God shun King David?
As I stated, there is a context and God's ways are not our ways...
-
-
-
swordfish7 wrote:B. W. wrote:
No I am not but there is a context one needs that only the Lord can give. Jesus came to save whom and he sat in the house of whom? From this, I hope you will see the context.
What does the passage say? We are not to shun unbelievers and the passage says we should associate with immoral sinners (of course with spiritual reason). It says we are to shun a person who claims to be a believer (and the implication here he is attending church) yet is living immorally (1 Cor. 5:11). So this does not conflict with Jesus sitting in the house of sinners or saving sinners.
B. W. wrote:
The Native American First Nation couple with the 15 year old son never darkened the door of a church. The man, for years stopped going to church. They came back to a meeting and the Holy Spirit alone saved and convicted them.
I will never post - if you are sinner we must shun you from attending a revival meeting on the door - there is a context.
Again, what does the passage say? We are not to shun unbelievers! So you are attributing to me something I am not saying.
1 Cor. 5:12 wrote:But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one.
B.W. wrote:I have counselled many immoral Christian believers who were wishing and praying to be free from their sexual sins and immoral sins booze, drugs, etc. They cannot share in a church because they would be shunned and never find the freedom Christ brings. So I pray and talk with them. Sooner of later they get it and find Isaiah 61:1-4 true and they repent and build a new way away from what ruined their lives.
You are correct that we need to keep the scripture in context or we can fall into error. The I Cor. 5 passage was addressing a difficult situation in the church where a young man was sleeping and openly living with his father's wife - likely his second wife not his mother. This was openly happening in the church and nobody was addressing it. So we need wisdom in applying this passage, specifically, how we should shun believers who are openly sinning without a heart to change. Certainly there are young men and older men who struggle with sexual immorality, but it does depend how long they have been a Christian and if they are concerned about the sin from the heart. If a guy is attempting to seduce women of the church then the issue should be addressed and the women protected: he should be shunned until there is real sorrow from the heart and a change. If he is sleeping with underage girls, then the police will be required. The goal in all this is restoration, but sometimes this is impossible. If a teenage kid is struggling with masterbation, then I don't think the kid should be shunned. A wife or husband who is hiding their drinking problem, at the same time claiming to be a Christian should possibly be shunned if there is no acknowledgement of the sin. A person who claims to be a homosexual openly living the lifestyle in defiance to the word should be shunned. A young couple who have been married under tribal traditions, who will shortly be married under state law should not be shunned. But I would advise them to get married under the state law first and then by the tribal tradition, though with the Christian context without any idolatry. The principle is that open defiant sin practiced by those claiming to be Christian should be addressed using shunning if they don't respond to the reproof.
B.W. wrote:
I also encounter some who simply love their immoral behavior more than the Lord and reject all prayers and help by either direct rejection or being a spiritual leech so for such persons they should be shunned but if they do come back, repentant, we are required to take them back in. If not, they are toast...
These are the ones we should shun, but not that alcoholic who is waging the war trying to overcome his addiction, where he falls down but again gets up to fight the battle.
B.W. wrote: The original statement on this thread dealt with a couple shacking up together and the gal being on the praise team with the Pastors approval. I cannot speak for the pastor other than he knows something we do not. If I understood the TV show comments rightly, it sounded like they were in process to be married soon. Maybe they split up for a time till they are married but I do not know for certain. They could married by now too. Eccl chapter three speaks of times and seasons to toss stones and not to toss stones...
If they were approached by the elders and they agreed to be married by a certain date, I would not shun them, but I would ensure they were not serving in the church until after some time after they were married.
B.W. wrote:
I actually do not have an issue with the woman being on the praise team due to the Pastor's decision (its on Him).
I don't think it is appropriate for the couple to serve in the church when they are engaging in fornication!
I agree with your Mega Church comments. Most of these churches are harmful to the body of Christ. By the way, I lived on Indian Reservations when I was a kid. My mom even carried me in a papoose board for a short while. Thank you for your heavenly service working with the Native American Indians. It can be challenging work I am sure!
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:39 pm
by Nessa
B. W. wrote:Here is something to consider...
King David...
A man after God's own heart as the bible reveals...
Did God shun King David?
I think both Jac and Kurieuo, in particular, have brung up some valid points reflecting different sides of the same coin.
As for King David, you are right. God didn't shun him because King David was repentant.
But lets not forget the pretty harsh words of Nathan that made King David realise exactly what he had done. Or the heart breaking concequences.
At least some non Christians seem to get confused about God. Is He like the 'mean, cruel, angry' God from the OT or like the 'gentle lamb' Jesus in the NT?
I think the real issue here is of eyes being open to the seriousness of sin, the grace of God, and the fallen state of humanity.
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:03 am
by Nicki
Kurieuo wrote:No, my wife when we came together wasnt Christian. I wasn't going to marry her until she became one, as it's one thing to subject myself to a non-Christian and another level of irresponsibility to subject your own kids and their souls, but I was quite assured she would. Had it on what I believed to be good word.
It'd be quite a different situation if we were married at the time one of us became Christian, difficult, make me feel sicky even at the thought of my loved one being lost especially if kids were there. I'm not sure, with everything else and taking my beliefs so strongly, I don't believe I could remain living together in such a situation. Separation didn't necessarily mean divorce , but it would set down firm boundaries that if she wanted me, then she'd need to really start seriously considering what I believe and come around. In fact, I told her flatly I wouldn't marry her until she became Christian.
She considered me quite naive, we'd have the occasional heated exchange about Adam and Eve, Evolution, Noah, and the like. About 4 years in, went to an Alpha with her, started up going to church and she tact along with me, and then she eventually became moved and answered an alter call
Yours is an extra difficult situation, given the more complicated health circumstances, I don't envy you and admire your resolve and character..
It doesn't always turn out well and I was "lucky" (if it be called luck rather than providence). I've heard other stories of couples, commitment just doesn't cut it. Sometimes not even legal marriage cuts it given the high divorce rates, Scripture alikens taking on someone new rather than being reconciled to fornicating also. Thankfully we can depend upon God's righteousness offered via Christ, because God and I both know I lack plenty of it.
That sounds like me. With us it was kind of fast-tracked though - we got married after more like 8 months than 8 years, and
almost didn't sleep together before. He never answered an altar call or anything - it was more a case of my explaining it and giving him a tract. I'm not sure if he's ever felt moved in response to God or not. I've told myself a few times (more often in the early years) that it was pretty stupid of me to think he'd really become a Christian just because I said he'd have to - but things are ok. On the whole.
Re: Heard this discussion about a shacked together couple
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 10:14 am
by 1over137
Before we married I had condition that I can freely teach kids Christian faith.