Re: Obama - what does this mean?
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:04 am
By logic, both are killers. However there is no comparison between Hitler and Obama on the abortion issue. Hitler ordered and headed genocide to purify the human race. Obama simply is a political head that supports what apparently most of the country and world agrees with.Kurieuo wrote:Actually by your same logic which wouldn't the soldiers be the killers and not Hitler?
If you're going to make this claim about a sinner (me) unable to stop humanities sins, how much more do you judge God on his allowing of such acts of which His is fully able to stop ALL sin!? Thank you for that though.Kurieuo wrote:Your comments here just support what I said, only rather than being inconsistent, you are more positively showing you are for allowing the killing of unborn human life.
Kurieuo, you seem to be missing my whole question...which regardless of my stance on Obama (whom I don't support) and abortion is this: What right does Jac3510 have in proclaiming dogmatically that ANYONE that voted for Obama has the blood of all abortion deaths past and future on their hands and the mere vote is a sin? While my stance on abortion has been given and my distaste for Obama has been stated many times on this forum, these are not the issue here.
I did read it. It plays no relevance to my question above...which is my whole reason for questioning Jac3510 on his dogmatic statement. I will, remind you that I place all human life at equal importance and not one over another. I will, however throw you my stance on slavery...slavery is wrong. While I lean towards the pro-choice, I realize that abortion is wrong. There's no doubt of that in my mind.Kurieuo wrote:You didn't read my post (third one back from this) about 'pro-choice' did you Bavarian? Seems like you only see one of two options which just backs up my thoughts that you don't really consider the unborn as valuable human lives. What does it mean to be pro-choice? I wonder if you would be pro-choice on infanticide, or slavery, or how about pro-choice drink driving?
It sure does...because if you partake of alcohol and support the legal intake of it...then any death as a result of abusing alcohol is, by Jac3510's statement on a vote for Obama, also placing that blood on your hands...and I'm sure you would disagree. Conveniently, you don't equate the two. Interesting because I'm sure you'd agree with:Kurieuo wrote:Read over Bavarian's posts again and you should notice what he writes is a lot more than responding to the issue of voting the wrong person in being a sin.
Matthew 5:21, 22 NIV wrote:You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, `Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment. But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, `Raca,' is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, `You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell.
But "supporting" legal consumption of alcohol isn't the same thing as a vote for Obama...in Jac3510's dogmatic statement? Seriously.Matthew 5:27, 28 NIV wrote:You have heard that it was said, `Do not commit adultery. But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
This isn't even the point of the question I raised about Jac3510's dogmatic statment. As distasteful as you promote me as being for a leaning on the pro-choice side, it has no bearing on the question. It matter not whether the person calling Jac3510 is pro-life or pro-choice, does it? All I know is God is pro-choice on ALL issues (in context of allowing and not dictating His will on us) since he's given us the ability to choose freely. His gift of choice/freewill does not make a choice of an act murder/killing right nor does it make a "wrong vote" a sin.Kurieuo wrote:Bavarian on the other hand has proclaimed himself as pro-choice so is a whole different kettle of fish.
It seems while we both may not agree on the pro-life and pro-choice aspect, I can say I agree with your reasons.Canuckster1127 wrote:As I've stated before too, I am pro-life and I've never voted for a pro-choice candidate at the national level.
I don't however accept that a pro-life position is a litmus test for any and every vote for the following reasons:
.
.