by DannyM on Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:02 pm
Silvertusk wrote:
Not at all. If you did not have the gift of salvation given to you in the first place then you would not be able to choose it would you. But it is still your choice whether to accept that gift - therein lies your freewill. If you have been ordained from the beginning that you would never choose salvation and were built for hell then this view is no better than the materialists who state that we are no better than the sum of our parts and our whole life is determined by our genetic makeup. If we are made in Gods image then we have that unique gift of total freewill, anything less then we are just puppets made for God's sadistic pleasure considering the amount of people he created just to go to hell.
Silver, is the gift of salvation something God just puts out there, not knowing who will accept and who will scoff?
Although this is between silver and Danny, i'd like to say
Yes brother Danny, this is what I believe really happens. God puts it out there, its all on us now, either we accept or we do not. I personally think that middle knowledge is just a cop out to the main problem. God does not make guesses, he either knows or he doesn't. To God there would be no probability. Probability goes in the face of omniscience (no offence to anyone, just my opinion)
Danny worte
Ephesians 2:1-5
1 As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins,
2 in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient.
3 All of us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our sinful nature and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature objects of wrath.
4 But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy,
5 made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions— it is by grace you have been saved.
What happened when we were dead in our sins? "
the Holy spirit convicted us in our hearts, and thus we had the choice to turn to God or remain in our life, the holy spirit did not automatically made that choice for us rather he gave us the opportunity to see ourselves through the eyes of God.
Regeneration must precede faith-
Yes but only when regeneration is accepted through wilful submission to the call of repentance. The prodigal son remembered his father and decided to go back. His father never took him back himself. Going back was his choice. What his father did, was to wait for him, and through grace accept him back. So even when God had already
enabled (I used this word cuz you mentioned it in your post, which I would quote down later, and then perhaps you can join the context , bro ) his son to come back without his knowledge, God did not automatically made his choice for him. He was to be well received whenever he choose to come. What God did was to enable him to enter once he comes back, which I think precisely is the work of Christ on the cross.
John 6:63-65
63 The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life.
64 Yet there are some of you who do not believe. For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray him.
65 He went on to say, This is why I told you that no-one can come to me unless the Father has enabled him.
First brother Danny, the words
"For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray him." are placed in brackets by some bible translations, which tells me that the text is not a literal part of the writing but a "theological reflection" to a certain view which the translator or the editor put in to clarify a certain meaning. I would not be surprised if this was added by someone who thought likewise and just supported the idea.
Second, "
This is why I told you that no-one can come to me unless the Father has enabled him."
when Jesus said this, had he died on the cross? No. Then how does the father enable someone? I think by grace, love and mercy. through Holy spirit. nonetheless the choice remains there. Also this particular instance may be credited to the call of being a disciple of Jesus, specifically. in the day and age.
Third, after Jesus died on the cross, his atonement and his blood is all that is needed to enable someone to come to Christ, and this is the work of the Father, is it not? It is that atonement now, which enables us to receive grace without any given works or criteria. In this way, God enables everyone who hears the gospel. Some are brave enough to venture on the narrow path, those who refuse, go on the easy path. Yet, the act the father enabling them, means not that they are automatically chosen on some unknown criteria and hence can not be lost or saved, one way or the other. I think the father enables us by the work of the holy spirit who convicts us of our guilt and shows us the love of Christ, even when we are dead in our sins. But we must accept that or reject that. When God enables us, the enabling part is just the part where we see how we have been wrong. Through the blood of Christ and his atonement we are now eligible carry out what we couldn't, by our own actions. So God's enabling is really what he has already done on the cross through his son.
About that choice which we talked, is also in John 6: 66-68
"66 From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.
67 “You do not want to leave too, do you?” Jesus asked the Twelve.
68 Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 We believe and know that you are the Holy One of God.”
70 Then Jesus replied, “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!” 71 (He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the Twelve, was later to betray him.)"
Jesus asks them to make up their minds, the choice is there and if it is, then it must be open and not predestined in God's knowledge.
I think God puts it out for everyone. So John 3:16 remains in effect all the time. It is really for all the world and if so, then surely it would be most unfair of God to just choose some people and enable them. If the father has only enabled some people to believe then this would be a direct opposition to John 3:16. If you say that the gospel is for everyone as John 3:16 says, then I really can't see how the above verse affects it. This is the heart of the matter, God's knowledge must have nothing to do to with our choice or else it is not our choice and by implication we don't have any. At least this is what I think brother Danny.