RickD wrote:Kurieuo wrote:I came across this in my online reading:
The will of the Blessed Virgin is completely conformed to that of Her Son, in other word – God. She is the most humble and chaste spouse of the Holy Ghost and will never do anything contrary to the will of God. Thus, we ought to trust the Blessed Mother just as God has, because She ultimately brings us to God. Mary is our Salvation, and Christ is the source of our Salvation. Mary is the Gate and Christ is the Key. It is only through Her that we are saved. God has so graced Her from the moment of conception to do His most perfect will and because of this He has entrusted Her to be the Mediatrix of ALL grace. In other words; all earthly blessings pass through the very hands of the Virgin Queen.
I don't want any "Protests" people. But, sincerely to my Catholic brethren, I'd be interested in a "please explain"?
K, it seems to me, that writer has gone outside of Catholic doctrine with some of those statements.
I could be wrong, but I don't think catholic doctrine teaches:
1) mary is the spouse of the HS
2) mary ultimately brings us to God
3) Mary is our salvation
4) all earthly blessings pass through the very hands of Mary
I'd like to hear a response from someone catholic about this too. But I'm afraid it won't happen here. There have been too many "catholic bashing" threads. I can't blame them if they don't want to get into it again.
No doubt, they went extreme in their veneration of Mary, saying it is "only through Her that we are saved."
Looking at the
about page on that website I quoted from, these are just a group of Catholics.
However, one has a masters in Theology and BA in philosophy. Others there just appear very passionate about their Roman Catholic faith.
My wife's mother would easily accept such beliefs and I dare say many casually reading would not really pick up on the details of what was wrong.
Storyteller picked it up straight-away, and I was hoping she would. But, I did extract it out and point out an issue.
It can be more difficult if people are just reading casually to pick up on sweet sounding words that are in fact awry.
Mary is no doubt blessed above all women, because she gave birth to and mothered Jesus who was God come to us in the full form of man.
One can love that, and even associate with and be drawn to Mary because of such and the more feminine motherly side.
Mary as
theotokos (mother of God) emphasises Christ's human and divine natures. That Christ, while fully God, was truly one of us.
One of my favourite lecturers when I studied was Catholic (in fact I had two favourite lecturers and both were Catholic). Anyway, during class breaks I had many casual discussions over coffees.
He once joked over a Catholic magazine article to do with Mary: 'We don't
really pray to Mary. We just "pray" to Mary but we never call it praying.'
Catholics will often protest against "Protestants" or "Christian Fundamentalists" as though this is an argument they bring.
However, I say this is a very real issue within the Catholic Church itself and what Catholics do in fact believe.
Shouldn't something be more proactively done within the Church to correct such misunderstandings?
The veneration of Mary unto the point she is actually receiving worship that only God should receive, and even taking Christ's place as we saw in these very passionate Catholics -- who are no doubt unashamed to proclaim their beliefs (however misguided some beliefs are in that they even usurp glory that belongs to Christ alone). I have also seen it in the Philippines, not just the veneration of Mary, but veneration of RCC-declared saints. For me, I felt the presence of evil, what people were doing was veneration unto worship only intended for God.
It can be apologetically coloured and responded to, said that such misunderstanding of the true Church position.
There are more theologically-astute Catholics who really understand Christianity and the misunderstandings many fellow Catholics may hold.
These may
and I say may draw a line with themselves to pick and choose what is right while
IGNORING THOSE ELEMENTS that they don't like, even when they see it displayed in fellow Catholics.
But, by just ignoring those elements they don't like, aren't they just being their own little "Protestant" now within the RCC amongst their brothers and sisters?
Indeed, it's not just these more theologically astute Catholics who turn a blind eye, but the RCC does. Correction and education is needed.
BUT, I'm often left with the feeling that it really doesn't matter what one believes, as long as they identify with or belong to the Catholic Church.
You know, Martin Luther and many Catholics at the time (because "Protestants" did not exist) saw much wrong with Pope Leo X.
What he was doing with indulgences, his lifestyle and the like where it is believed that he even reveled in homosexual relationships.
Luther only wanted to bring reform to within the Church. From my understanding, it was not his desire to cause schism and be excommunicated.
The Pope at the time refused to change and excommunicated Luther. Interestingly, thanks to good Catholics like Luther, a Counter-Reformation was happening and happened.
The saving grace to the RCC at the time, is that they had such people stand up, even if the Pope of the time ex-communicated such and made them an enemy to the RCC.
Luther's own 95 theses were primarily aimed at the Church's and indeed Pope's abuse on indulgences, wherein it was claimed one could be saved through such.
I'd encourage any Christian to look at both sides
at the time. Which side do you fall down on? Pope Leo X or Luther?
Theologically, Luther was correct and the Church at large during this time was wrong, greatly erring from the Apostles' teachings and insulting Christ.
In my opinion, Luther better led Christians during a time when the ordained Pope clearly wasn't following Christ and leading the whole church astray.
I do not say this to incite or attack Catholicism. I really admire and respect Catholics here like Byblos, Bippy and more recently EssentialSacrifice.
But, there are the historical truths of the matter which are often buried beneath prejudices and quibbles simply because one identified as Catholic or something other.