"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
I really didn't expect you to publicly call out the alt right for lying even when they are caught red handed...abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 8:42 pm Even if those in the alt-right media who believe she is dead are wrong,there is still no reason I can see to believe ANYTHING the MSM claims.It has got to the point to where even if they are actually telling the truth we still cannot believe it and we must look into it and question what they are claiming
February 15, 2019The 85-year-old justice attended a production of “Notorious RBG in Song” at the National Museum of Women in the Arts in Washington. The program about Ginsburg’s life in the law was created and performed by Ginsburg’s daughter-in-law, the soprano Patrice Michaels, and presented for high school students by the National Constitution Center.
February 18, 2019The court's eldest justice, who turns 86 next month, attended the private conference at which the justices review cases to be granted or denied, according to the public information office. Her presence makes it likely she'll be on the bench next Tuesday when oral arguments resume.
February 19, 2019We got RBG Monday in D.C. at Reagan National Airport and she answered the question on the minds of millions of worried Americans -- how's she doin'?
February 19, 2019Ginsburg, 85, climbed three steps to the court's bench with no apparent difficulty as the hour-long session began. She waited barely a minute before asking the first of five questions she posed in the patent case.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg took the bench at the Supreme Court Tuesday morning to hear oral arguments for the first time since she announced she'd undergone surgery in December for cancer.
She smiled slightly to the audience and was wearing one of her decorative neck collars -- a pearl jabot.
This is the same Q who gained notoriety with the infamous Pizzagate lies.“Q,” the anonymous person or group of people behind the “clues” that QAnon supporters decipher, was one of the first to suggest that Ginsburg’s absences were part of a cover-up about her health. On January 5, Q claimed that Ginsburg was only being kept alive with illicit drugs.
“What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?” Q wrote. “What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]? Who is managing her care?
Absolutely!DB: Those who rely on liars for information will inevitably begin to believe lies, and then continue to propagate those same lies.
Thanks for taking the time to respond however you are guilty of believing what the biased liberal media reports about RBG just like I said. The video from TMZ of RBG is a year old video you can see here.DBowling wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 4:23 amI really didn't expect you to publicly call out the alt right for lying even when they are caught red handed...abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2019 8:42 pm Even if those in the alt-right media who believe she is dead are wrong,there is still no reason I can see to believe ANYTHING the MSM claims.It has got to the point to where even if they are actually telling the truth we still cannot believe it and we must look into it and question what they are claiming
But here is a sampling of reports of RBG appearances, from multiple sources, at multiple times... and one with video.
February 4, 2019
Fox News
Ruth Bader Ginsburg makes public appearance, first since surgery
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ruth-b ... ce-surgery
February 5, 2019
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg makes first public appearance since cancer surgery
https://watertowndailytimes.com/nationa ... y-20190205February 15, 2019The 85-year-old justice attended a production of “Notorious RBG in Song” at the National Museum of Women in the Arts in Washington. The program about Ginsburg’s life in the law was created and performed by Ginsburg’s daughter-in-law, the soprano Patrice Michaels, and presented for high school students by the National Constitution Center.
She's back: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg returns to Supreme Court following cancer surgery
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 859678002/February 18, 2019The court's eldest justice, who turns 86 next month, attended the private conference at which the justices review cases to be granted or denied, according to the public information office. Her presence makes it likely she'll be on the bench next Tuesday when oral arguments resume.
TMZ video of RBG at Reagan International Airport
https://www.tmz.com/2019/02/18/ruth-bad ... ry-cancer/February 19, 2019We got RBG Monday in D.C. at Reagan National Airport and she answered the question on the minds of millions of worried Americans -- how's she doin'?
Ginsburg Is Active Questioner in First Argument Since Surgery
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ce-surgeryFebruary 19, 2019Ginsburg, 85, climbed three steps to the court's bench with no apparent difficulty as the hour-long session began. She waited barely a minute before asking the first of five questions she posed in the patent case.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg returns to Supreme Court for oral arguments
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/19/politics ... index.htmlJustice Ruth Bader Ginsburg took the bench at the Supreme Court Tuesday morning to hear oral arguments for the first time since she announced she'd undergone surgery in December for cancer.
She smiled slightly to the audience and was wearing one of her decorative neck collars -- a pearl jabot.
Since multiple sources, at multiple times, across the ideological spectrum have verified that RBG is alive...
Where did the lies about RBG begin?
Trump Allies Think Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Hiding or Dead. It Started on QAnon.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-all ... d-on-qanonThis is the same Q who gained notoriety with the infamous Pizzagate lies.“Q,” the anonymous person or group of people behind the “clues” that QAnon supporters decipher, was one of the first to suggest that Ginsburg’s absences were part of a cover-up about her health. On January 5, Q claimed that Ginsburg was only being kept alive with illicit drugs.
“What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?” Q wrote. “What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]? Who is managing her care?
Those who rely on liars for information will inevitably begin to believe lies, and then continue to propagate those same lies.
That is simply not true.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 6:29 pm Thanks for taking the time to respond however you are guilty of believing what the biased liberal media reports about RBG just like I said. The video from TMZ of RBG is a year old video you can see here.
https://youtu.be/mckBuqdH6xI
I have never said or defended the notion RBG is dead I am simply saying that we cannot know either way at this point. How can you know that about the RBG video? She is wearing the exact same clothes as in both videos.You are just claiming they are two different videos but she is wearing the exact same clothes.It is good for the alt-right to question the video and look into it to make sure it is not more propaganda being put out.You believe the biased liberal media eventhough there is absolutely no reason for you to do it because their credibility is so bad. You are steriotyping the alt-right media and obviously don't know enough about it to make an informed decision about the alt-right. Like I said even if those on the alt-right are wrong about RBG being dead they are still much,much more right and have much more credibility than the biased propaganda liberal media you trust so much.DBowling wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 7:17 pmThat is simply not true.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 6:29 pm Thanks for taking the time to respond however you are guilty of believing what the biased liberal media reports about RBG just like I said. The video from TMZ of RBG is a year old video you can see here.
https://youtu.be/mckBuqdH6xI
The two videos are from different times and involve different people around RBG.
The question from the TMZ cameraman about the RBG movie and her health in the Feb 2019 video shows that the TMZ video that I posted is current.
The people around RBG in the two videos are totally different.
In your video RBG's escort is a man.
In my video from last month RBG's escort is a female.
This is yet another attempt (and a lame one at that) to ignore facts and perpetuate a known lie.
Now I have presented multiple reports by multiple people of multiple appearances of RGB on multiple days.
You have yet to present a single report by a single person who was at the Supreme Court claiming that RBG wasn't there.
As I have said many times... a number of your sources of information deliberately lie on a regular basis.
The overwhelming evidence demonstrates that they continue to lie about RBG... despite the evidence... despite the facts... despite reality.
If you continue to depend on liars for your information, then you will continue to believe and perpetuate lies.
I do not believe you are deliberately spreading lies.
I believe that you are a victim of liars and you are being deceived, which is causing you to believe and propagate the lies of others.
Here's what you saidabelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:20 pm I have never said or defended the notion RBG is dead I am simply saying that we cannot know either way at this point.
I mentioned the reasons earlier...How can you know that about the RBG video? She is wearing the exact same clothes as in both videos
This is another untrue statement.You believe the biased liberal media eve though there is absolutely no reason for you to do it because their credibility is so bad.
Alex Jones is a serial liar.Like I said even if those on the alt-right are wrong about RBG being dead they are still much,much more right and have much more credibility than the biased propaganda liberal media you trust so much.
Collusion has already been shown. Or as Sideshow Don would say it, YES COLLUSION! Remember back before the first hacked emails were released, when Rudy Giuliani went on FOX and said that something big was about to drop? He knew that was coming because members of Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians who hacked the DNC and Leon Panetta. That's but one of many, many examples. Collusion is old news. Besides, collusion isn't even illegal, presumably because the Founders never dreamed that anything like this could possibly happen (or that half our government would put party over country if it did).abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmFor two years the media has been telling us the Trump administration is guilty of colluding with Russia
It seems like you don't know the guidelines that Mueller is following. Here's a link. It says:abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmand Robert Mueller has been investigating not only Russia collusion but digging into areas concerning Trump that have absolutely nothing to do with Russia collusion at all,looking for anything to remove President Trump.
Nope, they had a warrant. The raid was completely legal. Attorney-client privilege doesn't hold if it's being used to hide a criminal conspiracy.
Nothing?abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmThe Mueller Report was supposed to prove Russia collusion and crminal activiety of Trump so that they can impeach President Trump and yet nothing.
That's not quite how I remember it...abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmBoth the House and Senate bipartisan reports have been released and they both show no Russia colliusion
That's not even similar to reality. You are being lied to. Perhaps you should watch a bit of MSM reporting and see for yourself.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmand the media is now backtracking on what they have been spewing for two years about the Mueller investigation admitting that it is going to show no Russsia collusion.
Wrong again. The House investigations run by Gowdy, Nunes, and the rest were pure partisan hackery, aimed at protecting the President from criticism, not to mention impeachment and/or indictment. Then there was a Blue Wave - Q called saw that one coming, right? - and the Democrats took back the House. Now they're doing what the Congressional opposition always does - following their Constitutional mandate to check the authority of the Executive Branch. That's what we sent them there to do, Abe.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmWhich is why Adam Shifty Shiff is trying to move the investigatioons to the House to continue them.
Crush it in the midterms and retake the House? Because, honestly, it kind of seemed like that took you by surprise.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmWe knew months ago from Q what the Democrats were going to do before they did it.
What does that even mean? If Trump wants to declassify the FISA warrants he can do so at any time. Mueller and the House have nothing to do with it. Your words are gibberish.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmWe learned from Q that Mueller was their firewall to prevent Trump from declassifyoing FISA,
Again, what the hell are you talking about? What firewall? If Trump wants to declassify the FISA warrants he can do so, and nobody can stop him. Furthermore, the Mueller investigation has not been "moved to the House." The House is conducting its own independent investigations. I'm certain that anything they uncover will be swiftly forwarded to Mueller, assuming he hasn't wrapped things up, but there's no connection between the two entities. You're being lied to. Again.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmwe learned they are moving these investigations to the House to try to keep the firewall but it is not going to work.
They're doing exactly what everybody with any sense knew they'd do the minute they took the House. Q predicting House committee investigations is like me predicting tomorrow's sunrise.* Duh.
Believe him about what?abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmI don't even think Democrats believe Adam Shiff anymore but if they do they are in for a massive let down again.
I'm not mad. I just think you're being manipulated by alt-right conmen.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmAnd yet people get mad at us for ignoring what the MSM reports including Fox News.
I think we'll let people read through and look back over the video and see what they think. Again,you just choose to believe the MSM and I don't for many reasons.Based on the lack of credibility of the MSM and the fact I have not seen any evidence she is still alive.I still cannot believe the MSM about what they say about RBG being back at work on the Supreme Court. I'm going to go with the belief whether or not she is alive or dead,she is not back at work on the Supreme Court.She could still be alive after surgery but not in good enough health to be back at work,she could be being kept alive by machines,etc. But I do not believe the MSM when they claim she is back at work on the Supreme Court. I'll let you know if I find any evidence of the truth though. You do the same but do not try to get me to trust and believe the MSM like you do.DBowling wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:31 amHere's what you saidabelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:20 pm I have never said or defended the notion RBG is dead I am simply saying that we cannot know either way at this point.
"I'm saying that we do not know if she is alive or dead but I believe she is dead and the media is keeping her alive."
That tells me that someone has convinced you that RBG is dead.
I mentioned the reasons earlier...How can you know that about the RBG video? She is wearing the exact same clothes as in both videos
1. The questions the cameraman asks in the recent video references current events, such as the RBG movie and her health.
2. Her escorts in the two videos are different.
3. And there are even differences in her appearance between the two videos.
This is another untrue statement.You believe the biased liberal media eve though there is absolutely no reason for you to do it because their credibility is so bad.
I purposely referenced media from across the ideological spectrum on purpose.
My first reference from February 4 was from Fox News (The Trump News Network).
So the claim that I am relying solely on the liberal MSM is just nonsense.
I provided multiple reports... from multiple sources... from multiple times... from multiple locations... from multiple ideological perspectives.
You have yet to provide a single source who was actually at the Supreme Court on Tuesday to support your stated personal belief...
"I believe she is dead and the media is keeping her alive."
Alex Jones is a serial liar.Like I said even if those on the alt-right are wrong about RBG being dead they are still much,much more right and have much more credibility than the biased propaganda liberal media you trust so much.
QAnon repeatedly propagates misinformation and 'fake news'.
So those two alt-right sources have zero credibility.
I would also use "RBG is dead" as an accurate litmus test for the credibility of any source.
Any source of information that asserts that RGB is dead is either ignorant or being deliberately deceitful.
Either way, any source of information that propagates the lie that RBG is dead is non-credible and cannot be trusted.
And then there is the often repeated knee-jerk false assertion that I trust the liberal media.
My approach is simple...
I do not depend on a single source or single ideology for information.
I gather my information from multiple sources with multiple ideologies.
And you continue to repeat false statements about me, which speaks directly to your credibility.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 6:04 pm
Again,you just choose to believe the MSM and I don't for many reasons.
I have presented multiple reports... from multiple sources... on multiple days... in multiple locations.I have not seen any evidence she is still alive.
The evidence of the truth is there for all to see... for those who are actually interested in the truth.I'll let you know if I find any evidence of the truth though.
You are so easily propagandized by the MSM.I could take the time to refute much of what you posted.But I'm just going to tell you that the Democrats and media have had their fun bashing President Trump accusing him of colluding with Russia along with alot of other lies for two years.They have used up their ammo and it is depleted.Trump is a fighter you forgot all about and when he hits back The Democrats and media are going to be destroyed.And unlike all of the lies with no evidence thrown at President Trump there will have evidence to convict them for REAL crimes,not made up conspiracy theories like colluding with Russia.I see President Trump even deputizing US citezens and letting them do the arresting for the crimes they have committed. Once Mueller releases his report that is going to show no Russia collusion then the real fun of exposing the real criminals starts with REAL EVIDENCE,unlike with the media and Democrats for two years.edwardmurphy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:21 pm I have some procrastinating to do, so here goes...
Collusion has already been shown. Or as Sideshow Don would say it, YES COLLUSION! Remember back before the first hacked emails were released, when Rudy Giuliani went on FOX and said that something big was about to drop? He knew that was coming because members of Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians who hacked the DNC and Leon Panetta. That's but one of many, many examples. Collusion is old news. Besides, collusion isn't even illegal, presumably because the Founders never dreamed that anything like this could possibly happen (or that half our government would put party over country if it did).abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmFor two years the media has been telling us the Trump administration is guilty of colluding with Russia
It seems like you don't know the guidelines that Mueller is following. Here's a link. It says:abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmand Robert Mueller has been investigating not only Russia collusion but digging into areas concerning Trump that have absolutely nothing to do with Russia collusion at all,looking for anything to remove President Trump.
(a) Robert S. Mueller III is appointed to serve as Special Counsel for the United States
Department of Justice.
(b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI
Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals
associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is
authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.
In short, you're misinformed. It's not about "collusion." That's Trump's spin.
Nope, they had a warrant. The raid was completely legal. Attorney-client privilege doesn't hold if it's being used to hide a criminal conspiracy.
Nothing?abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmThe Mueller Report was supposed to prove Russia collusion and crminal activiety of Trump so that they can impeach President Trump and yet nothing.
Seriously?
Nothing???
That's not quite how I remember it...abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmBoth the House and Senate bipartisan reports have been released and they both show no Russia colliusion
That's not even similar to reality. You are being lied to. Perhaps you should watch a bit of MSM reporting and see for yourself.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmand the media is now backtracking on what they have been spewing for two years about the Mueller investigation admitting that it is going to show no Russsia collusion.
Wrong again. The House investigations run by Gowdy, Nunes, and the rest were pure partisan hackery, aimed at protecting the President from criticism, not to mention impeachment and/or indictment. Then there was a Blue Wave - Q called saw that one coming, right? - and the Democrats took back the House. Now they're doing what the Congressional opposition always does - following their Constitutional mandate to check the authority of the Executive Branch. That's what we sent them there to do, Abe.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmWhich is why Adam Shifty Shiff is trying to move the investigatioons to the House to continue them.
By the way, if you're wondering what the next year will look like here's a hint:
I know she can be a bit idealistic and reckless with her words, but I'd rather have her on my team than that idiot with the "Liar, liar, pants on fire" sign. That clip was 4 minutes of pure brilliance. I think the kid has a future.
Crush it in the midterms and retake the House? Because, honestly, it kind of seemed like that took you by surprise.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmWe knew months ago from Q what the Democrats were going to do before they did it.
What does that even mean? If Trump wants to declassify the FISA warrants he can do so at any time. Mueller and the House have nothing to do with it. Your words are gibberish.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmWe learned from Q that Mueller was their firewall to prevent Trump from declassifyoing FISA,
Again, what the hell are you talking about? What firewall? If Trump wants to declassify the FISA warrants he can do so, and nobody can stop him. Furthermore, the Mueller investigation has not been "moved to the House." The House is conducting its own independent investigations. I'm certain that anything they uncover will be swiftly forwarded to Mueller, assuming he hasn't wrapped things up, but there's no connection between the two entities. You're being lied to. Again.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmwe learned they are moving these investigations to the House to try to keep the firewall but it is not going to work.
They're doing exactly what everybody with any sense knew they'd do the minute they took the House. Q predicting House committee investigations is like me predicting tomorrow's sunrise.* Duh.
* I predict that the sun will rise.
Believe him about what?abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmI don't even think Democrats believe Adam Shiff anymore but if they do they are in for a massive let down again.
I'm not mad. I just think you're being manipulated by alt-right conmen.abelcainsbrother wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:47 pmAnd yet people get mad at us for ignoring what the MSM reports including Fox News.