The mind of Moses - Midianite cruelty?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 3:18 pm
Hello all! I made a post asking about something Moses did in what's known as a "hard passage". The mods wanted to to reference it, so here it is--from the Revised Standard Version:
Numbers 17 Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. 18 But all the young girls who have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
Atheists use these passages a lot! Is there any kind of answer as to why these brutal methods of warfare were necessary? I've tried to justify it myself, saying that it was a different time, it was war--but it's been a personal struggle for me.
I saw an interview with Oliver Stone who was talking about Alexander the Great(EXCELLENT MOVIE). Stone was told that there were reports that Alexander gave women and children to his soldiers, and Stone said, "Absolutely not. He executed any man who raped a civilian." (if that needs a reference, it was from the Charlie Rose Show)
I have no way of knowing if Mr. Stone's information is accurate, but let me get this straight: The warrior Alexander was more humane than Moses?! Didn't God know that passages like this would make people think war crimes were justifiable in God's eyes? Am I missing something? I would like a page dedicated to this specific incident. There is a page on the moral implications of the flood and stuff, saying that those that died in the flood and Sodom deserved what they got. This is quite true, but there were other "hard passages" that were not mentioned. If the Bible is inerrant, then they can't be ignored.
I hope none of you think I'm some Christian basher (for more on me you can read my intro). I'm just concerned. I know that you sometimes have a few atheist bums on this board that try to stir up trouble, so I'd understand if you had a "hisss! He's a rebel spy!!" kind of feeling about me.
Numbers 17 Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. 18 But all the young girls who have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
Atheists use these passages a lot! Is there any kind of answer as to why these brutal methods of warfare were necessary? I've tried to justify it myself, saying that it was a different time, it was war--but it's been a personal struggle for me.
I saw an interview with Oliver Stone who was talking about Alexander the Great(EXCELLENT MOVIE). Stone was told that there were reports that Alexander gave women and children to his soldiers, and Stone said, "Absolutely not. He executed any man who raped a civilian." (if that needs a reference, it was from the Charlie Rose Show)
I have no way of knowing if Mr. Stone's information is accurate, but let me get this straight: The warrior Alexander was more humane than Moses?! Didn't God know that passages like this would make people think war crimes were justifiable in God's eyes? Am I missing something? I would like a page dedicated to this specific incident. There is a page on the moral implications of the flood and stuff, saying that those that died in the flood and Sodom deserved what they got. This is quite true, but there were other "hard passages" that were not mentioned. If the Bible is inerrant, then they can't be ignored.
I hope none of you think I'm some Christian basher (for more on me you can read my intro). I'm just concerned. I know that you sometimes have a few atheist bums on this board that try to stir up trouble, so I'd understand if you had a "hisss! He's a rebel spy!!" kind of feeling about me.