Page 1 of 1
The Gaia Hypothesis
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:34 pm
by SUGAAAAA
my Biology teacher was talking about alternative theories for life on Earth, and she mentioned the "Gaia Hypothesis", which is a theory that states the Earth and all living creatures on it are 1 organism, the living creatures are to help maintain a suitable environment for earth.
Is this an accurate view of life? It was pretty interesting but she didnt say much else, so I wanted to read more on it.
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:19 am
by IRQ Conflict
I don't know much about that belief, I think it is eastern mysticism not sure though.
In light of that belief, on a physical level you could say it is partially true considering God made us from the dust of the earth (Carbon). However we are also imparted with spirit so that way of thinking can only get you so far.
It's like trying to go visit God with the space shuttle, the way I see it.
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:00 pm
by bizzt
Sounds like the Bahaii Faith...
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:53 pm
by ryo dokomi
that kind of thinking is an eastern philosophy.
This is a good site that talks about much of that stuff. alot of the New Ager's think of that kind of thought too. come
Here to find that
it sound like this...
Monism--the belief that all things are of one essential substance, giving rise to statements like, "I am the universe. I am one with all things." There is no room for a dualistic view of God transcending creation, and being apart from creation, in this mindset. All is One.
-----
Mike Shreve #5
this is a site by a man named Mike Shreve. he was a guest speaker at my church this last sunday too, and he was awesome.
http://www.thetruelight.net is the full site. have a look at it, its very imformative.
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:52 pm
by BGoodForGoodSake
The Gaia Hypothesis is the idea that Earth and its biosphere work together to reach equilibriums in systems. Just as our bodies do internally.
In this way it is possible to study the Earth as a single organism whose cyclical systems are interwined in complex ways to reach equilibriums such as oxygen content in the atmosphere and ambient temperatures.
It's another paradigm with which to study the earth. From this perspective it's more top down, with ecosystems and organisms being seen as components of a living Earth.
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 9:48 pm
by Cougar
I actually think that the Gaia Hypothesis is a fairly healthy way to look at the Earth and our lives here. If we viewed ourselves as one with the Earth, then when we hurt the Earth (which we do all the time) we hurt ourselves. I believe this thought would improve our ideas and distortions regarding our natural resources and envoke a sense of respect for everyone and every living thing on the planet.
I have actually had an environmental ethics class where we discussed how Christianity has been bad for natural resources because of the viewpoint that "we have domain over the land and all living things"... meaning that many see this statement as an excuse to exploit the land. Now, I have read this in the Bible and I don't see it this way, but we argued in class that many have interpretted this notion as though we can just do whatever we want to the Earth because "we have domain". I feel that this statement was more intended to be interpretted as though we should take care of the Earth because we can. I would like to know what you all think? Can you see how this could be misconstrued?
By the way, I could be wrong, but I believe that the Gaia Hypothesis is very similar to how Native Americans view the Earth... they traditionally have great respect for everything and take nothing for granted.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:14 am
by IRQ Conflict
If people would obey God, that would be healthy all around.
Rev 11:18 And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 5:33 pm
by Cougar
Yes, I suppose that if everyone believed in God and no one argued over what or who this God is, that would be all right. However, we all know that is not the case, so to argue that "if we all obeyed God, we would be healthy all around" just isn't a good argument.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 5:40 pm
by IRQ Conflict
Heh, it might not be, in your opinion 'a good argument' but it is going to be the only solution. Man will continue to screw things up until Christ returns. It's in his nature.
Re: The Gaia Hypothesis
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:14 pm
by N4SC
The Gaia Hypothesis is a greek myth that states the titan "Gaia" which means earth mother or something is the entire planet and has trees on her back.
So, no.