Astronomical Evidences for the God of the Bible
Astronomical Evidences for the God of the Bible
gone
Last edited by Jbuza on Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Recognized Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm
excellent post.
I agree fully. How does hugh ross have anything to do with this post though?
I will call apon the earth moon system again, as I feel it is a very important piece of a puzzle used to calculate the age of the earth.
Physics show that the moon is traveling further and further away from the earth at a slower and slower speed.
The numbers invovled show that the earth would have been touching the moon at one point in order for the earth to have been as old as scientists would have us believe.
So far, no strong evidence has been provided to disprove the earth moon system.
I agree fully. How does hugh ross have anything to do with this post though?
I will call apon the earth moon system again, as I feel it is a very important piece of a puzzle used to calculate the age of the earth.
Physics show that the moon is traveling further and further away from the earth at a slower and slower speed.
The numbers invovled show that the earth would have been touching the moon at one point in order for the earth to have been as old as scientists would have us believe.
So far, no strong evidence has been provided to disprove the earth moon system.
- BGoodForGoodSake
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
- Christian: No
- Location: Washington D.C.
How exactly does physics show this?tyler_demerhcant wrote:excellent post.
I agree fully. How does hugh ross have anything to do with this post though?
I will call apon the earth moon system again, as I feel it is a very important piece of a puzzle used to calculate the age of the earth.
Physics show that the moon is traveling further and further away from the earth at a slower and slower speed.
The numbers invovled show that the earth would have been touching the moon at one point in order for the earth to have been as old as scientists would have us believe.
So far, no strong evidence has been provided to disprove the earth moon system.
Perhaps you can show us the specific figures?
Perhaps you need to investigate this matter further, there are plenty of explanations which counter this proposition.
It is not length of life, but depth of life. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
-
- Recognized Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm
I posted it before begood, purhaps you show me some counter arguments because I have not seen any stand up to debate.
I have resources to. I dont want to go into detail again, but I will if this post sparks some more interest on it.
Perhaps we should also discuss comet life, I have yet to research it, but it seems interesting.
I have resources to. I dont want to go into detail again, but I will if this post sparks some more interest on it.
Perhaps we should also discuss comet life, I have yet to research it, but it seems interesting.
- Canuckster1127
- Old School
- Posts: 5310
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:31 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Comet life is interesting. Just make sure you include recent information and developments with the Kuyper Belt.tyler_demerhcant wrote:I posted it before begood, purhaps you show me some counter arguments because I have not seen any stand up to debate.
I have resources to. I dont want to go into detail again, but I will if this post sparks some more interest on it.
Perhaps we should also discuss comet life, I have yet to research it, but it seems interesting.
Dogmatism is the comfortable intellectual framework of self-righteousness. Self-righteousness is more decadent than the worst sexual sin. ~ Dan Allender
- BGoodForGoodSake
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
- Christian: No
- Location: Washington D.C.
You mentioned that the moon is falling away from the earth at a slower and slower speed.tyler_demerhcant wrote:I posted it before begood, purhaps you show me some counter arguments because I have not seen any stand up to debate.
I have resources to. I dont want to go into detail again, but I will if this post sparks some more interest on it.
Perhaps we should also discuss comet life, I have yet to research it, but it seems interesting.
What is the reasoning behind this?
It is not length of life, but depth of life. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
-
- Recognized Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm
- BGoodForGoodSake
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
- Christian: No
- Location: Washington D.C.
-
- Recognized Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm
How so? Because I am willing to reasearch the facts, or because i will realize the flaws.
I have read that the physics involved are outdated. i will have to reaearch it to include it, but I am far to busy right now and I am reasearching Radiometrics and processes involved.
Have you heard about the RATE project.
I would like to find some material that goes against the project if possible.
I have read that the physics involved are outdated. i will have to reaearch it to include it, but I am far to busy right now and I am reasearching Radiometrics and processes involved.
Have you heard about the RATE project.
I would like to find some material that goes against the project if possible.
- BGoodForGoodSake
- Ultimate Member
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:44 am
- Christian: No
- Location: Washington D.C.